Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Audi e-tron (Edit1).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Audi e-tron (Edit1).jpg (delist), not delisted

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2015 at 00:40:55
Red car

  •  Info There is a lot of noise [distracting/irrelevant elements] in this picture. Many lamp lights are reflected in the red surface of the car and the windows. The background is noisy in the up left corner with that big blue thing. The big blue thing is reflected in the windows in the left side of the car (and also on the floor). I think many men and boys like the photo because of the great car, but that is not a valid reason for having the photo listed as a featured picture. (Original nomination)
  •  Delist -- Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 00:40, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I have another opinion. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Take a look to the original. I think your noise are a true color or pattern at the wall. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:48, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, and you don't think these elements/noise are irrelevant to a plain photo of a car. I don't see lamp lights reflecting in the surface of the car and the blue light do anything good to the photo. --Nobelpeopleuploader
@Nobelpeopleuploader  Question Sorry, but I think you never saw a real camera RAW file and its properties? Otherwise you wouldn't talk nonsense here. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 03:42, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Alchemist-hp  Comment I don't think I understand your question and I don't see why your question is relevant to judging a photo... By the way "noise" and "irrelevant elements/reflections" are the same to me. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 16:46, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Replaceable or not replaceable is irrelevant when judging featured pictures. And regarding the noise: You didn't see the many reflecting lamp lights and the big blue thing in the left corners and in the left windows? --Nobelpeopleuploader
  • Sure, I agree with you regarding judging each FPC on its merit, but here you have nominated one for delist, which can be done if the pic doesn't satisfy the FPC standards any more. But this pic is still of high quality, has nice aesthetic feel to it and shows the subject in a way different to others in its category. As for the noise, I don't think what you said qualifies as noise IMHO. May be it could be glare, but considering that it was taken in an expo, surely there would be some reflections. Nikhil (talk) 05:39, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • You think these irrelevant elements/noise that I described in my nomination above are okay to have in featured pictures? You think the picture is "some of the finest on Commons." --Nobelpeopleuploader
First of all, I think we should remove the fp template from the original, because it was delisted, in what we nowadays would do as a delist and replace.Edit: I should learn to read Back then, the consensus was that the edited version is better, and we should respect that. Then anyone who thinks the original was better can start a delist and replace back to the original. — Julian H.✈ 09:20, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I don't see any significant noise anywhere, and the LED screen on the top left doesn't worry me. It's not a studio shot, but when it comes to car show photos, this is probably as clean as those get. — Julian H.✈ 09:20, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • You think these irrelevant elements/noise that I described in my nomination above are okay to have in featured pictures? You think the picture is "some of the finest on Commons." --Nobelpeopleuploader
  • As I said, I don't see anything that worries me. And yes, I think the picture is among the finest on Commons, otherwise I wouldn't vote "keep". Btw, I think something is wrong with your signatures. — Julian H.✈ 09:07, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • And you don't think these elements/noise are irrelevant to a plain photo of a car. I don't see lamp lights reflecting in the surface of the car and the blue light do anything good to the photo, esspecially not a featured one which should be "some of the finest on Commons." --Nobelpeopleuploader
  • Have you ever been to a car show like the IAA? Shooting conditions are not easy there and normally there is an insane number of people standing around everything. We should take into account that this is not exactly the kind of car we see driving around every day. And no, I don't mind seeing the lights too much. --DXR (talk) 08:47, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • That it is a car show is irrelevant. If it is difficult to take very good pictures at a car show, then you shouldn't take pictures at car shows. It is that simpel. (And by the way, it is very easy to go in to an Audi store and take much better pictures of cars). --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 16:49, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 delist, 6 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. KTC (talk) 12:00, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:12, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/removal/File:Audi_e-tron_(Edit1).jpg&oldid=153150921"