Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 01 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Open_Wing_Nectaring_of_Acraea_terpsicore_(Linnaeus,_1758)_-_Tawny_Coster_WLB_DSC_4193a.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Open Wing Nectaring of Acraea terpsicore (Linnaeus, 1758) - Tawny Coster --TAPAN1412 02:59, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose IMO too noisy, lack of detail. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:15, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Robert --Plozessor 05:38, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree -- Alvesgaspar 15:10, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Robert has a point, but I think this is still just tolerable for a QI --Sandro Halank 20:56, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Sandro Halank 20:56, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Jointless bridge, Maker Faire, Berlin (BL7C0225).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Jointless wooden bridge after Leonardo Da Vinci at Maker Faire Berlin 2018 --MB-one 17:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Weak oppose Picture and description ok, please give it a better name. Indeed the composition leaves a lot to be desired. (Would be great without the chair.) --Plozessor 06:22, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Distracting background with the chair. --Kallerna 06:34, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unfavorable composition with too much distraction. --Milseburg (talk) 14:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose. I don't understand the composition. -- Spurzem 19:29, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose sorry, but per Kallerna --Sandro Halank 18:59, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --C messier 13:09, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Toronto,_November_13,_2023_-_060.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Toronto Inukshuk Park, Ontario --Another Believer 13:45, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality --Llez 15:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Tilted in ccw direction and needs a pespective correction --Poco a poco 20:38, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Of boderline overall quality, but would need at least perspective/angle correction. --Plozessor 05:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality, I see no tilting buildings. -- Spurzem 16:45, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
 Comment And I see no straight building. Check alone the TV tower. --Plozessor 18:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Needs PC. --Tagooty 03:12, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Poco --Sandro Halank 18:57, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --C messier 13:08, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Toronto,_November_13,_2023_-_061.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Toronto Inukshuk Park, Ontario --Another Believer 13:45, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Túllio F 15:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose There is no detail here, lacks perspective correction --Poco a poco 20:38, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Poco a poco --Plozessor 05:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Poco a poco --Jakubhal 05:42, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support I see a good image. -- Spurzem 16:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
  • If this image is a QI, let's give the QI stamp to all noms here. Come on Poco a poco 21:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Poco --Tagooty 03:09, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Poco. This should not be nominated in the first place, let alone supported. --Kallerna 07:22, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Poco --Sandro Halank 18:56, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Poco. Zero detail.--Peulle 14:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 7 oppose → Declined   --C messier 13:08, 30 November 2023 (UTC)