Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 12 2013
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
-
- Nomination Coral bells (Heuchera x cultivar), leaves, in a garden, France. --JLPC 18:30, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 21:17, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Sun Trust building in Tampa, Florida -- Alvesgaspar 17:00, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose nice light but unsharp + posterization --A.Savin 17:12, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Maracaibo Lake view in night --The Photographer 11:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion QI for me. --JLPC 18:28, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Circus Motion blur --The Photographer 11:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 12:30, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination East Side Hotel. Mühlenstraße, Berlin-Friedrichshain --ArildV 11:08, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion
Comment Good quality, but please cut the right side for about 10 px to avoid the branches of the tree. I made an annotation. --Cccefalon 13:40, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 
Done Thank you!--ArildV 17:14, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
It's perfect now :) --Cccefalon 17:54, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Khai Nok Island, Thailand --Poco a poco 10:42, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 12:33, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Port of Phuket, Thailand --Poco a poco 10:42, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 18:23, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Naka Island, Phuket, Thailand --Poco a poco 10:42, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion see note --A.Savin 17:04, 9 December 2013 (UTC) Done Poco a poco 18:25, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Support OK --A.Savin 19:31, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tapu Island, Phuket, Thailand --Poco a poco 10:42, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Cccefalon 10:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fionn Carr, winger at Connacht Rugby. Warm-up session of Heineken Cup match between Stade toulousain and Connacht Rugby, on December 8th, 2013. --PierreSelim 08:12, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 21:19, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 221133 at Stafford. Mattbuck 08:03, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:03, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Thézan-lès-Béziers, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 07:49, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Opuntia stricta --Christian Ferrer 07:49, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support OK --A.Savin 17:01, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A confessional with baroque sculptures at Klosterkirche Fürstenfeld (Maria Himmelfahrt). --Mummelgrummel 05:27, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose CA. Too tight crop at the bottom. --Cccefalon 08:48, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A confessional with baroque sculptures at Klosterkirche Fürstenfeld (Maria Himmelfahrt). --Mummelgrummel 05:27, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Forsbacher Hof after renovation in Rösrath-Forsbach, Germany --Cccefalon 05:04, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok --Poco a poco 11:03, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old townshall of Rösrath in Rösrath-Hoffnungsthal, listed as cultural heritage monument --Cccefalon 05:04, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Helvoirt, church, NL --Michielverbeek 23:04, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Tower tilted. This cannot fixed IMO, as there is not enough space left. Hence no QI --Cccefalon 05:47, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Geertruidenberg, church in the street, NL --Michielverbeek 22:59, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Tilted. In general, this photo is lacking fine details on the main subject as well as in the foreground. Concerning the crop: There is too much sky and darker foliage. . --Cccefalon 06:05, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Ford Model A 1930-1931 at Koglhof, Styria --Herzi Pinki 20:25, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Kadellar 00:43, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination At Komyoji in Nagaokakyo --663highland 14:05, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Bad crop (hand on the right side). Nice atmosphere but the crowd of people make it look like a common snapshot. I also miss sharpness in the foliage. Sorry, no QI for me. --Cccefalon 06:11, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kenrokuen garden --663highland 14:05, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Too blurry, CAs, loosing a lot of contrast at the branches but a nice motive.
-
- Nomination Statue of Joseph and child at Kranzgasse and Herklotzgasse, Vienna --Herzi Pinki 00:04, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment several dust spots. --P e z i 00:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC) Comment thx, dust spots removed. --Herzi Pinki 20:23, 8 December 2013 (UTC) Support OK now. Good quality --P e z i 10:18, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trier with the river Mosel --Berthold Werner 18:26, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Needs perspective correction on the right --A.Savin 11:31, 8 December 2013 (UTC) Done I took the church tower as a reference --Berthold Werner 11:48, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
OK for QI. --A.Savin 19:28, 9 December 2013 (UTC) - Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Trier with the river Mosel --Berthold Werner 18:26, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Betula in Wikelslân.--
Famberhorst 05:44, 7 December 2013 (UTC) - Decline Insufficient quality. Very nice composition and colours but photographic quality imo is not enough for QI --Moroder 22:22, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination Betula in Wikelslân.--
-
- Nomination Bast Cancer, a cell proliferation in the bark of a willow (Salix).--
Famberhorst 16:16, 6 December 2013 (UTC) - Decline Blurry, esp on right. --Mattbuck 20:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination Bast Cancer, a cell proliferation in the bark of a willow (Salix).--
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Interior of the Hong Kong Airport --Poco a poco 09:21, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 20:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of the Hong Kong Airport --Poco a poco 09:21, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 20:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nina Church (by Amadvr) Kruusamägi 00:26, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Overexposed IMO. --Mattbuck 20:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kroonuaia bridge in Tartu (by Amadvr) Kruusamägi 00:26, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Comment The overall quality is fine for me, but please remove the bird spots in the sky. So far, I counted four of them --Cccefalon 08:40, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
This is already QI apparently. Mattbuck 20:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Großer Blaupfeil - Orthetrum cancellatum, Weibchen (female). --Hockei 22:04, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Too bad, the DOF is too shallow here. Considerable parts are out of focus and there are highlights with magenta CA in the wings. Also the gras is too dominant and too close to the dragonflies head. So sorry, but no QI for me. --Cccefalon 05:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Weisweiler --EveryPicture 21:28, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Perspective problems. Too much blurry objects in the sky. CA. Overprocessed. Missing sharpness. Sorry, not a QI. --Cccefalon 05:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Deputado Federal Paulo Maluf (o ex-prefeito de São Paulo)--Jose Reynaldo da Fonseca 18:06, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline High ISO noise, bad composition. --Mattbuck 20:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Laranjal, plantação em Avaré Brasil--Jose Reynaldo da Fonseca 17:59, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Lacks fine detail. --Mattbuck 20:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Laranja no pé (Avaré- SP) --Jose Reynaldo da Fonseca 17:49, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Fruit is not in focus. --Mattbuck 20:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Guimaraes, Portugal: Sculpture in front of Paço dos Duques de Bragança --Cccefalon 16:42, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Too dark, the face. I'm not convinced with the crop --Moroder
Done brigtened face and applied 1:1 crop. Thanks for the advise. --Cccefalon 11:50, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Fine by me. Mattbuck 20:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lighthouse of Cabo da Roca, Portugal --Cccefalon 16:42, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Withdrawn In spite of the rule of thirds, I think there is too much empty sky.--Jebulon 16:47, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Comment It's of course also a question of personal taste but I understand your hesitation. I will upload another version of the photo but it will appear as an own version as I consider the present version still valuable for Wikipedia. --Cccefalon 17:19, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Info I withdraw the photo - not because I am no more convinced of it but "his twin" was promoted and I don't need two QI for one photo with different crop. --Cccefalon 17:59, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Ratsada St, Phuket, Thailand --Poco a poco 10:06, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Lacks definition on left. Not exactly unsharp, but oddly blurred. --Mattbuck 20:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Senff' stairs in Tartu (by Amadvr) Kruusamägi 00:21, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Unsharp. --Mattbuck 20:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maria Kirchbüchl in Unterhöflein --Brackenheim 10:52, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Good but need tilt/perspective correction.--ArildV 11:30, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Not done and too tight a crop at the bottom. Mattbuck 20:00, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Isla Khai Nok, Thailand --Poco a poco 09:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC) Comment People distortion on the left + one person cut (it's irrelevant but why not crop it) --Moroder 14:39, 7 December 2013 (UTC) Crop improved Poco a poco 22:09, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Not sharp IMO. Mattbuck 20:00, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination Isla Khai Nok, Thailand --Poco a poco 09:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Taborkirche (Tabor Church) in Berlin-Rahnsdorf. --Marcus Cyron 16:18, 4 December 2013 (UTC) Comment Needs perspective correction
- Decline Not done --Cccefalon 05:11, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination Taborkirche (Tabor Church) in Berlin-Rahnsdorf. --Marcus Cyron 16:18, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church in Marxdorf. --Marcus Cyron 16:18, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Small dustspot. Needs perspective correction. --Cccefalon 22:27, 4 December 2013 (UTC) Not done --Cccefalon 05:11, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Viru bog (by Urmas83) Kruusamägi 00:31, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Notable
chromatic aberration --Iifar 08:16, 1 December 2013 (UTC) Not done --Cccefalon 05:11, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Viru bog (by Urmas83) Kruusamägi 00:31, 1 December 2013 (UTC) CommentHighly atmospheric high key shot, but I'd suggest some minor changes: Trees are leaning, so a perspectivic correction is necessary. And exposure should be somewhat darker, at the left there is some clipping. The somewhat high colour saturation is acceptable. -- Smial 10:57, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Pretty, but a bit unsharp and several dust spots. Mattbuck 19:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination Viru bog (by Urmas83) Kruusamägi 00:31, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Front side of St.Elisabeth, catholic church in Eschwege --EpsilonEridani 20:40, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Needs perspective correction. --Cccefalon 21:51, 26 November 2013 (UTC) Done --EpsilonEridani 14:54, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
That is a lot of sky. Mattbuck 21:01, 2 December 2013 (UTC) Done Took away some part of the sky --EpsilonEridani 22:18, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Comment Sorry, it still does not convince me. Might be, it's because of oversaturation of the blue channel. The blue is even dominant in the wall of the building. Perhaps resolvable by adjusting WB and reducing blue. --Cccefalon 10:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Uploaded a different version. Better ? --EpsilonEridani 22:06, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Support Considerably better! Thank you for your patience and sending so many new versions on the way to QI. --Cccefalon 22:36, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Emalätte cave after collapse (by Vaido Otsar) Kruusamägi 19:35, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Decline I don't feel this is QI, though I can't really put a finger on why. Mattbuck 21:01, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Oppose White balance not properly done (white warning sign is blue). Blown out highlights. CA in the branches. --Cccefalon 10:31, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
,_Sign_--_2012_--_4937.jpg)
,_November_2013.jpg)
_(Haldern_Pop_Festival_2013)_IMGP6016_smial_wp.jpg)
_1.jpg)
_1.jpg)
_1.jpg)
_REFON_2.JPG)
,_Sonnenuntergang_--_2011_--_8.jpg)
.jpg)
_--_2005_--_2.jpg){kind=link}
.Wasserspeier.4.ajb.jpg){kind=link}
Consensual review
[edit]File:Harz,_Brockenbahn_(am_Brocken)_--_2005_--_2.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Brockenbahn at the Brocken, Harz, Germany --XRay 05:23, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Nice but overexposed (blown sky and yellow thingy in the foreground) --Kreuzschnabel 08:45, 7 December 2013 (UTC) Comment Sorry, but the sky isn't overexposed. It was very, very foggy and so it looks like overexposed. Even parts of the train are still in the fog. I improved the image with more contrast. May there are more problems with this image, I will repect your decision. Thanks for your review!--XRay 11:10, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Move it to CR then to have more opinions. --Kreuzschnabel 12:40, 7 December 2013 (UTC) - Oppose - the test of overexposure is "are large areas #FFFFFF". In this case the answer is yes - the reason is irrelevant, especially when you've lost detail to it (flagpole). Mattbuck 19:38, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose There is no #ffffff (it's mostly #F7F7F7 in the original version ;-)), but the over all quality is not sufficiant. Many JPG artifacts, and noise. The reworked version is a downgrade, as the artifacts show up stronger than before. -- Smial 23:43, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support. Gegenstand der Aufnahme ist die Lokomotive, nicht der neblige Himmel. Ich habe schon Hunderte QIs mit nicht nur hellem, sondern miserablem Hinter- und Vordergrund gesehen, die niemand beanstandete. Und außerdem: Hätte der Fotograf etwa einen Eimer über das gelbe Teil der Elektroinstallation stülpen sollen? Ich habe an dem hier vorgestellten Bild nichts auszusetzen; deshalb „Pro“. -- Spurzem 10:02, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Erstens wird hier nun mal jedes Bild für sich beurteilt, das Argument „aber das-und-das Bild ist auch durchgekommen“ zieht nie. An dem gelben Teil stört mich nicht seine Anwesenheit, sondern seine Überbelichtung bis ins Weiß (in der 1. Version). Und an dem Gesamtbild stören mich außerdem noch die heftigen Schärfungsartefakte (sieh dir mal das Geblubber an den Kanten des Waggons an), das Bild ist overprocessed. Massiv nachgeschärft bei gerade mal 4 Megapixel? Sorry, aber die technische Qualität ist für mich nie und nimmer QI, obwohl das Bild an sich einklich schön ist (ich hätte es unten so weit beschnitten, daß das gelbe Teil nicht mehr drauf ist). --Kreuzschnabel 07:16, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination It's just an image. I see the trouble at the edges. Sorry. We should focus on all the other images. --XRay 07:37, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
_--_2005_--_2.jpg){kind=link}
_--_2005_--_2.jpg){kind=link}
_--_2005_--_2.jpg){kind=link}
_--_2005_--_2.jpg){kind=link}
_--_2005_--_2.jpg){kind=link}
_--_2005_--_2.jpg){kind=link}
_--_2005_--_2.jpg){kind=link}
_--_2005_--_2.jpg){kind=link}
File:Albrecht_Mayer_with_the_Wikipedia_Einmaleins.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Oboist en:Albrecht Mayer with File:Einmaleins-screen.pdf --Jean11 13:29, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose overexposed --Christian Ferrer 08:11, 5 December 2013 (UTC) lightroom says: brightness ok --Jean11 17:58, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
The background looks to me ffffff to me, and even if not it's distracting. Oppose. Mattbuck 22:51, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Oppose as per Christian. too noisy. also perspective not properly handled. --Cccefalon 10:46, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → 
Declined --Cccefalon 22:25, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Declined --Cccefalon 22:25, 11 December 2013 (UTC)File:Fort_Jefferson_FL13.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Fort Jefferson, FL --Acroterion 22:15, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:40, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Oversharpened to try and get over the fact that the focus is on the near distance, not the fort. --Mattbuck 21:21, 2 December 2013 (UTC) - Oppose Oversharpened. -- Smial 09:14, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- On looking at the original, I see what you mean about the focus point and don't see an easy solution. Given that and the demanding lighting conditions as noted on the other Fort Jefferson shot (high noon is never a good time to shoot), I'm inclined to withdraw. Acroterion 13:39, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Monument_in_Qasr_Prison.JPG
[edit]
- Nomination monument in Qasr Prison --مانفی 09:26, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Comment qualiy is ok, please fix ccw tilt. --Iifar 13:10, 25 November 2013 (UTC) Done--مانفی 04:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
IMO it's a bit soft. Could you sharpen please, and maybe decrease low level brightness? Mattbuck 00:42, 30 November 2013 (UTC) Doneمانفی 08:58, 30 November 2013 (UTC) - Sorry, I didn't notice I'd commented previously. The new version is still unsharp, and I also noticed some red/green chromatic aberration. This image is not QI. Mattbuck 21:45, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Mono_Lake_South_Tufa_August_2013_018.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination South Tufa, Mono Lake. --King of Hearts 17:54, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Lack of sharpness. --Iifar 18:45, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
If this were downsampled to 3 MP, it wouldn't be noticeable; and the full-res version contains strictly more detail than a 3 MP version. --King of Hearts 05:27, 1 December 2013 (UTC) Oppose Downsampling will hide the problem, but we evaluate full-res version here, and that's imo not a QI. --Iifar 08:12, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
The point is, if it's perfectly sharp at the minimum required resolution, then why shouldn't it pass? --King of Hearts 11:00, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined --Cccefalon 17:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Declined --Cccefalon 17:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)File:London MMB «60 Canary Wharf.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Canary Wharf, London. Mattbuck 10:05, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose I see come CA on the building at the right, especially towards the top. It's really not a lot of CA but I personnaly find it quite visible because of the spahe of the building (lot of high contrats edges) and its white color. --D4m1en 16:11, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, I'm not seeing it. Mattbuck 00:35, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined --Cccefalon 17:48, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Declined --Cccefalon 17:48, 9 December 2013 (UTC)File:AGH Berlin 10-2013 img10 Andreas Otto.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Andreas Otto, deputy of Abgeordnetenhaus Berlin --A.Savin 15:25, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:53, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. Image is flipped. --Smial 10:28, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- How do you know that?! did I miss something? Poco a poco 13:36, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- The pocket is on the wrong side.--ArildV 13:40, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- wow, thanks for the reply, Poco a poco 18:36, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- The pocket is on the wrong side.--ArildV 13:40, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- How do you know that?! did I miss something? Poco a poco 13:36, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Flipped, which is fake for me. --Stepro (talk) 10:47, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support It deprives nothing of the quality and is not contradictory with the guidelines...I think --Christian Ferrer 15:14, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
*
Support It deprives nothing of the quality and is not contradictory with the guidelines --Christian Ferrer 15:15, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose No "retouched" template : it deceives the reviewer, and is unreal. What I see is a reflection of a portrait, not a portrait.--Jebulon 18:02, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Cccefalon 17:46, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Declined --Cccefalon 17:46, 9 December 2013 (UTC)File:AGH Berlin 10-2013 img45 Karlheinz Nolte.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Karlheinz Nolte, deputy of Abgeordnetenhaus Berlin --A.Savin 15:25, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Decline SupportGood quality. --Jean11 22:11, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Oppose I disagree Image is possiblyflipped --Smial 10:28, 30 November 2013 (UTC) Oppose Flipped, which is fake for me. --Stepro 10:48, 3 December 2013 (UTC) - Support It deprives nothing of the quality and is not contradictory with the guidelines --Christian Ferrer 15:16, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose No "retouched" template : it deceives the reviewer, and is unreal. What I see is a reflection of a portrait, not a portrait.--Jebulon 18:03, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Cccefalon 17:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Declined --Cccefalon 17:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC)File:Norderstrasse_8_Seeth_IMGP6113_wp.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination: Denkmalgeschütztes Haus in Seeth, Kreis Nordfriesland. --Smial 13:24, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Review Oppose Overexposed. --Mattbuck 17:16, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Where? --Smial 10:43, 28 November 2013 (UTC) Support It's good.--XRay 10:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → 
Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Cccefalon 17:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Cccefalon 17:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)File:Hof_Eisenstecken_in_Villanders_05.JPG
[edit]
- Nomination Gothic entrance door armhouse "Eisenstecken" in Villanders --Moroder 17:26, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Bad lighting, over-exposion in the bush at the right. Please discuss. --
- weak Support minor blown highlights, overall pretty ok --Vamps 16:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose - Lack of contrast, overexposed highlights. Mattbuck 23:14, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Cccefalon 17:29, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Declined --Cccefalon 17:29, 9 December 2013 (UTC)File:Dom (Magdeburg-Altstadt).Wasserspeier.4.ajb.jpg
[edit].Wasserspeier.4.ajb.jpg)
- Nomination Gargoyle at Magdeburg cathedral, Germany. --Ajepbah 20:11, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Oppose CA around the whole figure on the right side, not really sharp --Poco a poco 20:28, 13 November 2013 (UTC) New version CAs removed, sharpened --Ajepbah 22:37, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support QI -- Spurzem 20:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Comment The picture is too denoised, all details are gone and some CA is still there Poco a poco 22:05, 15 November 2013 (UTC) – I feare you see ghosts or it is a problem of my glasses for I see no CA but I see the figure sharp. -- Spurzem 22:54, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Too much NR --Christian Ferrer 13:15, 16 November 2013 (UTC) – What do you mean with NR please? -- Spurzem 22:54, 16 November 2013 (UTC) Noise Reduction --Christian Ferrer 08:35, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- weak Support imo it meets QI criteria --Vamps 16:11, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support After CA reduction and sharpening. --Cayambe 08:41, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose - lacking colour depth. See for instance around the mouth. Mattbuck 20:17, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose overprocessed. as per Christian and Matt. --Cccefalon 19:38, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Interesting object --Moroder 15:29, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:41, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support I see no CA, a sharp object and normal color depth. --Stepro 01:01, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others--Lmbuga 22:39, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → 
Promoted --Cccefalon 17:31, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Promoted --Cccefalon 17:31, 9 December 2013 (UTC)File:Martina_Maaßen_LT_NRW_by_Stepro_IMG_1062_LR50.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Landtagsabgeordnete NRW Martina Maaßen --Stepro 10:18, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:29, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Oppose clearly oversharpened, every little wrinkle or skin artifact is visible, not acceptable for a woman's portrait --A.Savin 15:23, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Info This picture is completely unedited, it has not been sharpened. Even bad that a portrait is either too blurry or too sharp. ;-) Stepro 16:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Anyway, you may compare to this one, significant difference for me, --A.Savin 16:28, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Support Excellent technical quality imo.--ArildV 20:34, 3 December 2013 (UTC) And I dont think we should have different criteria for portraits of men and women, your own portrait (with much higher resolution) shows the skin in much more detail. Regards --ArildV 20:42, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Support It's perfect and I don't think there should be different criteria for portraits of men and women. D4m1en 10:38, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Support Not the highest resolution but definitely QI --P e z i 20:41, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Cccefalon 22:07, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Promoted --Cccefalon 22:07, 11 December 2013 (UTC)File:Ciablung_a_Picolin_detail_western_wall.JPG
[edit]
- Nomination Detail of the western wall of the abandoned farmhouse "Ciablung" in San Martin de Tor --Moroder 14:07, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Overexposure on right, generally dull. --Mattbuck 21:01, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
I disagree It is not overexposed, dullness is not a QI parameter --Moroder 07:16, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
To clarify, by dull I meant lacking vibrance, not any aspect of interest/value. Mattbuck 21:38, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined --Cccefalon 17:34, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Declined --Cccefalon 17:34, 9 December 2013 (UTC)File:AGH Berlin 10-2013 img42 Sven Heinemann.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Sven Heinemann, deputy of Abgeordnetenhaus Berlin --A.Savin 13:41, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment May be another crop is recommended, with the head in the horicontal center. --XRay 15:26, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- Maybe you're right, I just looked after the raw data, but sorry, the original file has the same crop at the right (for me not critical though) --A.Savin 19:34, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment We should ask for another opion.--XRay 11:12, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I can second that. In my opinion the face should be more prominent in this good portrait shot and it could be easily achived by another crop. --Cccefalon 11:44, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Possible crop suggested : see note, please. --JLPC 19:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support I still had made the crop tighter, but it is already good enough for QI. --Cccefalon 19:44, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support Better now. -- Smial 15:56, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support Per Cccefalon and Smial. --JLPC 18:03, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Cccefalon 22:05, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Promoted --Cccefalon 22:05, 11 December 2013 (UTC)