Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 07 2015
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
-
- Nomination Kg. Pinangsoo, Kudat, Sabah: Basel Christian Church Malaysia (BCCM) Pinangsoo --Cccefalon 00:39, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:24, 05 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vindictive WW1 memorial in Ostend, Belgium -- MJJR 22:12, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:19, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cliffs of Heimaey, Westman Islands, Suðurland, Iceland --Poco a poco 19:51, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 20:00, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dýrafjörður, Vestfirðir, Iceland --Poco a poco 19:51, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:17, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A subfossil shell of Pugilina morio --Llez 19:39, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:17, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chemin du Mas Rousson. Sète, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 17:32, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:15, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Surface of a footbridge, Bonn, Germany (by Hasenläufer)--Leit 15:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 19:45, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blue cheese from raw milk of Jersey cattles, aged 5 to 8 weeks Origin Toggenburg, St. Gallen - Maître fromager affineur Willi Schmid, Städtlichäsi, Lichtensteig, Toggenburg --Hubertl 15:42, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:20, 05 February 2015 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Raw milk Reblochon colombière from Stans, Aargau - Maître fromager affineur Rolf Beeler --Hubertl 15:42, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:14, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A ČSD Class 423.0 departs from Náchod station (Czech Republic). --Daniel Holý CZ 14:46, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose too much clipped areas (overexposition), for info there are purple CAs --Christian Ferrer 17:19, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Lahad Datu, Sabah: SPC Biodiesel Sdn Bhd at Lahad Datu POIC (Palm Oil Industrial Cluster) --Cccefalon 13:20, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:17, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Blue Lake. The road towards the lake Ritsa, Abkhazia. --Halavar 11:05, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:17, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Great Green Bush-Cricket.Grünes Heupferd (Tettigonia viridissima) --NoRud 10:08, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Noisy. Maybe this is fixable. But also DOF is too shallow. I would choose F13 for a picture like this. And the crop below is too tight for me. --Hockei 15:52, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination 5 Zamenhofa Street in Lądek-Zdrój 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:46, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Halavar 11:08, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 5 Zamenhofa Street in Lądek-Zdrój 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:46, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Halavar 11:08, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Administration of the "Unibazalt" mine in Lutynia --Jacek Halicki 09:46, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:48, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Russell Marsden, guitarist of Band of Skulls, at Paaspop 2014 --Achim Raschka 09:41, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good composition and QI -- Spurzem 09:54, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marcus Bischoff of Heaven Shall Burn at Vainstream Rockfest 2014 --Achim Raschka 09:41, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion QI for me--Cesco77 10:06, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alligatoah at Rock im Park 2014. By User:2eight --Achim Raschka 09:41, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice shot --Cesco77 10:06, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Close view of a cat suffering a serious desease, probably scabies. The left eye is missing, showing a terrible infection. I found this cat on a little island. --Cesco77 08:57, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Though it's an awful picture of the cat's desease: good quality. --Dn@lor_01 11:022, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Loosely translated: Frosted breathing roots (pneumatoforen) a cypress (Taxodium distichum) in the Famberhorst.
Famberhorst 05:45, 4 February 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --XRay 05:48, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Loosely translated: Frosted breathing roots (pneumatoforen) a cypress (Taxodium distichum) in the Famberhorst.
-
- Nomination Location, The Famberhorst. Black poplars (Populus nigra).
Famberhorst 05:45, 4 February 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:38, 04 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Location, The Famberhorst. Black poplars (Populus nigra).
-
-
-
- Nomination Stock image at the Halterner Straße, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:31, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:10, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Stucco relief of Saint Mark at the Saint Anthony of Padua chapel of the parish church Saint Giles at Tigring, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:51, 04 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, but why not, for example f5.6 and f11 for more depth?--Famberhorst 07:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Obsolete door handle at the cemetery, Poertschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:47, 04 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 08:45, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Railjet leaving the station, Poertschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:35, 04 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Spurzem 08:42, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination w:Shingle Run (West Branch Run). Jakec 03:30, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 09:17, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Jon Davies at the Wikimedia UK-organised editathon and training session at the British Film Institute (BFI) library at BFI Southbank on 26 January 2015. By User:Thryduulf --Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 22:52, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Though I'm still undecided if the positon of the lamp is a mischief or adds to the workshop surrounding of the motif, I think, that the overall quality is good enough for QI. --Cccefalon 15:35, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New Hall, Camden. By User:Leela0808 --Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 22:52, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose oberexposed clouds, perspective --Christian Ferrer 06:27, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Roebuck, London SE1. By User:Edwardx --Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 22:52, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Perspective not done, also jpeg artefacts as a result of overprocessing. --Cccefalon 14:28, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hamburg, former customs office Ericus 1, now cultural heritage monument --KaiBorgeest 22:45, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 10:12, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination The walls of the Samaria Gorge, Crete. --C messier 18:30, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, but why f4.5?--Famberhorst 06:03, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Program mode, it's f/9 equivalent.--C messier 14:22, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Okay, thank you.--Famberhorst 19:26, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eobania vermiculata (Chocolate-band Snail) --Christian Ferrer 18:23, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline What is the subject? There is jus a small part of the snail shell focused, the rest is completely unsharp. --Hubertl 13:05, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chemin du Mas Rousson. Sète, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 18:23, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:57, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel, Oia, Santorini, Greece. --NorbertNagel 17:53, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. the lower left wall probably in nature not vertival as the other verticals are sufficiently rectilinear. --Cccefalon 15:22, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hunting the Robot at Paaspop 2014 --Achim Raschka 15:01, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Despite the difficult light situation QI for me. --Hubertl 09:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maximilian fountain and parish church Saint Martin, Techelsberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:35, 02 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion The tower is crooked.--Famberhorst 05:57, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Done Corrected version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 03:20, 04 February 2015 (UTC)Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:06, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oia, Santorini, Greece --NorbertNagel 16:13, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 15:47, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Paul (Rome) - Facade --Livioandronico2013 14:31, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Sorry: 1. Facade is too dark. 2. Bad composition because of the trees which are quite disturbing. Both not fixable IMO. --Code 18:39, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statues of Basilic of St. Paul --Livioandronico2013 14:30, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose I am really sorry, but: 1. General lack of sharpness, especially concerning the edges (camera shake?). 2. Bad light situation, most of the subject is in the shadow. 3. Bad composition because the statues make a very little part of the picture, the rest of the facade is not quite interesting (and much too dark). --Code 18:43, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) with a variety of mistletoes (Viscum album) --Code 08:57, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion *
Comment this lens produces some perspective distortions with 24mm. Try to fix it!--Hubertl 11:21, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
* Comment Hm. I already used the lightoom distortion correction. Which problems do you still see? --Code 13:03, 1 February 2015 (UTC) Es wirkt auf mich, als ob die Perspektive nach oben zusammenbricht, es ist aber möglicherweise Zufall, dass der Baum links und rechts sich jeweils nach innen neigen.--Hubertl 20:58, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
* Done --Code 05:09, 4 February 2015 (UTC)Good quality. With the correction, it is QI for me. --Hubertl 15:52, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pori Jazz 2013. --Kallerna 18:33, 31 January 2015 (UTC)* Comment insufficient description and categorization for the subject.
- Decline Bad quality anyway - the players are sharp but the conductor is disturbing, it all feels tilted, and you got someone's head or something interfering bottom right. --Mattbuck 23:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Pori Jazz 2013. --Kallerna 18:33, 31 January 2015 (UTC)*
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Domestic goat(Capra hircus), Tierpark Hellabrunn, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 08:37, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Please correction description. --C messier 19:06, 3 February 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Comment It looks like it has motion blur and then sharpened. --C messier 19:06, 3 February 2015 (UTC) Description fixed and new version uploaded Poco a poco 21:34, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
weak Support good enough for QI. --C messier 14:26, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
QI would be better with a tighter crop at the top. Mattbuck 23:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Domestic goat(Capra hircus), Tierpark Hellabrunn, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 08:37, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Glenn Kurtz at the IFFR 2015 --1Veertje 12:22, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion The face is too dark for me. -- Spurzem 13:29, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment Hello Spurzem, I set it back to "Nomination" to make sure, that the CR-Rules are followed, e.g.: "Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you can not make a decision, add your comments, but leave the candidate on this page." Cheers, --Cccefalon 14:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
It's a bit noisy, and a bit lacking contrast, byt ok. Mattbuck 23:47, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination USO-FCG - 20140913 - Michel Martinez --Pleclown 11:39, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Too dark for me. I ask for other votes. -- Spurzem 13:28, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment Hello Spurzem, I set it back to "Nomination" to make sure, that the CR-Rules are followed, e.g.: "Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you can not make a decision, add your comments, but leave the candidate on this page." Cheers, --Cccefalon 14:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
The face is indeed too dark and perhaps also a little bit too much magenta. All fixable. Please add a little bit magenta defringing for the glasses. --Cccefalon 16:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Background's too bright, face too dark. Mattbuck 23:47, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Impression inside the Grand Bazaar, Istanbul --Martin Falbisoner 18:43, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
A few hot pixels, and the bottom left seems a bit blurry. Mattbuck 23:18, 3 February 2015 (UTC) - Withdrawn --Martin Falbisoner 06:51, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Impression inside the Grand Bazaar, Istanbul --Martin Falbisoner 18:43, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chandelier inside Süleymaniye Mosque, Istanbul. --Martin Falbisoner 18:43, 29 January 2015 (UTC) Comment Tilted CCW, lots of CAs, chroma noise and rather soft. --C messier 19:12, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn --Martin Falbisoner 06:51, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Chandelier inside Süleymaniye Mosque, Istanbul. --Martin Falbisoner 18:43, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Turkish flag inside the Grand Bazaar, Istanbul. High ISO necessary when shooting with available light. --Martin Falbisoner 18:43, 29 January 2015 (UTC) Comment Too ISO noise and the flag isn´t enough sharp IMO Ezarate 01:41, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn --Martin Falbisoner 06:51, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Turkish flag inside the Grand Bazaar, Istanbul. High ISO necessary when shooting with available light. --Martin Falbisoner 18:43, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pendulum clock Ansonia. C.1901, Ansonia Clock Co. --Ivan2010 12:36, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Why is it tilted? Ram-Man 12:46, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
It shoot perspectively to on purpose, not to present it so front, I believed it could be better --Ivan2010 13:11, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Poor crop (too much space below, too little above), clumsy cut-out (left side) --Kreuzschnabel 13:48, 2 February 2015 (UTC) - Decline Poor clipping, bad CA. Mattbuck 23:43, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Pendulum clock Ansonia. C.1901, Ansonia Clock Co. --Ivan2010 12:36, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entree to the cross-harbour-tunnel --Ralf Roletschek 14:00, 26 January 2015 (UTC Comment Titled. Pleclown 11:45, 30 January 2015 (UTC))
- Decline
Not done --Mattbuck 23:32, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Entree to the cross-harbour-tunnel --Ralf Roletschek 14:00, 26 January 2015 (UTC
-
- Nomination Hong Kong, view from iSQUARE ti the Masterspiece --Ralf Roletschek 14:00, 26 January 2015 (UTC) Comment Titled. Pleclown 11:45, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
And underexposed too. --C messier 11:55, 31 January 2015 (UTC) - Decline Not done --Mattbuck 23:33, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Hong Kong, view from iSQUARE ti the Masterspiece --Ralf Roletschek 14:00, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Basilica of Nuestra Señora de los Milagros, Ágreda, Spain --Poco a poco 12:25, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion * CommentIs there not some problems with perspective and tilting? --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:59, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
I've introduced some improvements, but if you don't mind I'd like to keep the perspective as it is Poco a poco 21:31, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
It's like you want ... I was just asking a little question--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:39, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Seems tilted clockwise to me. Some skewing may be necessary. Mattbuck 10:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC) New version Poco a poco 20:53, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Well I can't say I'm a fan of this image, but nothing to prevent QI I think. Mattbuck 23:32, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cloister of the Collegiate of the Santo Sepulcro, Calatayud, Spain --Poco a poco 10:51, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment The central arch is clearly overexposed. --C messier 13:46, 21 January 2015 (UTC) Done Poco a poco 19:27, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Is it meant to be leaning out? Mattbuck 23:51, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
That building is really a mess. I wonder that it stands... Poco a poco 18:58, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
I#m not quite sure about this - the fence seems blurry on the right.
Neutral Mattbuck 22:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC) Support QI for me, as long as the main subject is sharp. --C messier 15:02, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.JPG)
.JPG)
_03.jpg)
_-_Facade.jpg)
.jpg)
,_Tierpark_Hellabrunn,_M%C3%BAnich,_Alemania,_2012-06-17,_DD_01.JPG)
![1.1 File:2014_Droga_w_kierunku_jeziora_Rica,_"Miodowy_Dwór"_(03).jpg](#File:2014_Droga_w_kierunku_jeziora_Rica,_"Miodowy_Dwór"_(03).jpg){kind=link}
_-hu-_3871.jpg){kind=link}
Consensual review
[edit]File:2014_Droga_w_kierunku_jeziora_Rica,_"Miodowy_Dwór"_(03).jpg
[edit].jpg)
- Nomination "Honey manor". The road towards the lake Ritsa, Abkhazia. --Halavar 23:01, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--NoRud 09:07, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Noisy, overexposed sky. --Mattbuck 22:42, 5 February 2015 (UTC) Done Both things are fixed now. --Halavar 01:58, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Ok then! Mattbuck 17:18, 6 February 2015 (UTC) - Support -- Spurzem 12:00, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
File:AT-20134_Empress_Elisabeth_monument_(Volksgarten)_-hu-_3871.jpg
[edit]_-hu-_3871.jpg)
- Nomination Side fountain at the Empress Elisabeth monument (Volksgarten) --Hubertl 21:49, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 08:09, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
ok but before a promotion the tilt and the perspectices should be corrected --Christian Ferrer 09:34, 1 February 2015 (UTC) complete wrong crop. Repaired.--Hubertl 21:17, 1 February 2015 (UTC) - The ledt is always leaning out --Christian Ferrer 05:44, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Done Thank you for your kind due diligence!--Hubertl 10:40, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support ok for me --Christian Ferrer 21:18, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support, good, here I see what's it about, on 3842 some time ago I was lost. –Be..anyone 08:58, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → 
Promoted --C messier 15:09, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Promoted --C messier 15:09, 6 February 2015 (UTC)File:Poertschach Landspitz Passagierschiffe Thalia und Klagenfurt 27092014 883.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Passenger ships "Thalia" and “Klagenfurt” with the Pyramid Ballon in the background, Poertschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:05, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose nice but burned out overexposed areas on the main subject, not fixable, also dustspots (see notes) --Christian Ferrer 05:49, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support I disagree. Some problems are fixable, some are not so relevant, beeing QI --Hubertl 08:09, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Hubertl, It will be good that you don't vote in QIC page for images that you edited, and if there is no rules IMO it's needeed. --Christian Ferrer 12:27, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Please accept, that people may have a complete different approach to wikimedia projects. My approach is striktly a collaborative one. This implies, that people are working together not only for themselves, but for the project itself and not against. If you once have made almost 130k of edits, you will understand this. Maybe. --Hubertl 01:24, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- I had a (very-very) large hours editing the images of others and no one can say my approach is not collaborative (or less collaborative than yours), and most of the images I edited have been promoted here and at least a more of a dozen at FPC, but on this page where one vote means a lot when I am involved in the editing an image I try to stay back because it is my work that is potentially found and judged here. Because a bad edit, I don't say it's the case here, but a bad edit can make a potential good image not QI, so the editor must stay neutral. It is my collaborative opinion on that subject. And most of the users in this page already apply this very collaborative way to work. --Christian Ferrer 07:58, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- And the fact that you, the editor, take here the freedom to support this work without trying to correct the defects I mentioned is not at all a collaborative work. --Christian Ferrer 08:28, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- I had a (very-very) large hours editing the images of others and no one can say my approach is not collaborative (or less collaborative than yours), and most of the images I edited have been promoted here and at least a more of a dozen at FPC, but on this page where one vote means a lot when I am involved in the editing an image I try to stay back because it is my work that is potentially found and judged here. Because a bad edit, I don't say it's the case here, but a bad edit can make a potential good image not QI, so the editor must stay neutral. It is my collaborative opinion on that subject. And most of the users in this page already apply this very collaborative way to work. --Christian Ferrer 07:58, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support Natural brightness is not overexposed for me. The dust spot of course should be eliminated. -- Spurzem 23:02, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- If everyone support saying the defects should be corrected, this images will be promoted without that defects will be corrected. --Christian Ferrer 08:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- See also that --Christian Ferrer 08:41, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- Everyone has their own point of view are what image defects. Once I can judge from my own experience with Christian Ferrer, I agree with clearly Support. --Steindy 23:47, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Dustspots not fixed. The small clipping areas could on one hand have been avoided, on the other hand they are rather small and I would tolerate them, if they were the only flaw. -- Smial 13:57, 2 February 2015 (UTC) Btw.: It was always tacit agreement that editors do not promote their own work, but should abstain.
- Oppose dustspots not fixed, but I have no issue with Hubertl supporting his own edit. Ram-Man 14:31, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → 
Declined --C messier 14:45, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Declined --C messier 14:45, 6 February 2015 (UTC)File:Pennsylvania Route 254 north of Rohrsburg.JPG
[edit]
- Nomination Pennsylvania Route 254. Jakec 00:37, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment IMO a better crop is necessary.--XRay 10:24, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- Personally, I like this one the way it is. Jakec 17:15, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Personally, I like this one the way it is. Jakec 17:15, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Let's ask for another opinion.--XRay 16:44, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support I agree with XRay that another crop would be better, but I think that this version still meets QI standards. --Code 06:02, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support a crop to square may be better? --Ralf Roletschek 14:10, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support I like it as it is. QI for me --Hubertl 02:35, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Oversharpened and (very slight) overexposed. But sharpening halos everywhere... -- Smial 14:51, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support Good enough for me. Alvesgaspar 19:38, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --C messier 14:43, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Promoted --C messier 14:43, 6 February 2015 (UTC)