Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 08 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Lissabon Rossio Nationaltheater 2014.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Teatro Nacional D. Maria II, Lisbon. --Felix König 22:03, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support OK! --A.Savin 23:43, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Needs a perspective correction and maybe a little bit more brightness. --Code 18:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It's inclined to the right.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:36, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 14:08, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Cupola of a belfry of Saint Isaac's Cathedral.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination St. Petersburg. The cupola of a belfry of the Saint Isaac's Cathedral. --Dmitry Ivanov 08:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 09:04, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Disturbing reflexes, can be fixed --Moroder 14:14, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment I agree with Moroder – partially. The burnt out area in the bottom really spoils the photo, but, IMO, doesn’t ruin it. Reflexes on the tower look naturally and good enough. I am not ready to spend extra time for fixing of reflexes – the shot isn’t extraordinary, so let’s discuss the photo as it is. ~~~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmitry Ivanov (talk • contribs) 17:13, 1 января 2016 (UTC).
  •  Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:13, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. Small overexposed spots are o.k., they make the photo more interesting from an artistic point of view. --Hasenläufer 19:30, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Small overexposed spots are o.k., but these reflections are not small and located at essential parts of the object. -- Smial 14:18, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 14:07, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Kihnu õigeusu kirik 2015.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Kihnu island center (by Hiiumaamudeliklubi). Kruusamägi 09:48, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Fields in rear unsharp in places --Daniel Case 07:35, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support For this kind of image it's OK. Lights could be reduced. IMO still QI. Let's discuss. --XRay 08:32, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough. The fields in the background don't matter. --Palauenc05 08:00, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 08:59, 7 January 2016 (UTC)