Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 01 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Featured-movie.svg

[edit]

  • Nomination Featured videos proposed logo. --Piotr Bart 14:04, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Too simple. --SH6188 09:13, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment How is this too simple? I'm sure the film is advanced enough, and also the star itself is not that simple. --Piotr Bart 16:29, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support This is a valid barnstar adaptation that fits perfectly into the referred category [[Category:Commons projects logos]]. Why not a SVG theme as a quality image? --Franz van Duns (talk) 22:07, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support A nice adaptation with a skeuomorph. --PantheraLeo1359531 18:13, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted Piotr Bart (talk) 17:28, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Bootshütte_Fischunkelalm_Nationalpark_Berchtesgaden.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Das Bild zeigt eine Bootshütte am Obersee nahe der Fischunkelalm im Nationalpark Berchtesgaden. --Sebastian Schütte 11:01, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality for me. --Manfred Kuzel 11:53, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment I would have liked to see it through a polarization filter killing the highlights in the reflection. --Dktue 12:54, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Yes, using a polarizer would be an interesting idea, but we should not require this for a QI image. The image is OK as it is. --Aristeas 15:41, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 14:29, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Πάρκο_Γκιουέλ_2782.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Tower of the smaller entrance building (Parc Güell). --C messier 18:14, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Too noisy, especially at the foot of the tower. --Jacek79 22:37, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. --Vengolis 01:55, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good to me too --Podzemnik 02:09, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Das Foto könnte etwas aufgehellt werden, aber dennoch noch O.K. für mich. --Manfred Kuzel 09:29, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good focus to main object, but sea does not look beautiful for me --Michielverbeek 18:37, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 14:30, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Noctilucent-clouds-msu-6813.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Noctilucent clouds in Laboe, Germany --Matthias Süßen 09:49, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Looks oversaturated --Podzemnik 01:54, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
     CommentI uploaded a new, less saturated version. --Matthias Süßen 06:56, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose CA. --Smial 09:29, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
     Comment I uploaded a new version without CAs. --Matthias Süßen 09:56, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Thank you for the corrections! IMHO good now. (Maybe still a bit too saturated, but this is somewhat a matter of taste.) --Aristeas 15:44, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Thank to the corrections, Good quality IMO --PJDespa 16:48, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 14:31, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Luxembourg_City,_Hollerich_–_école_et_place_de_jeux_2019a.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Luxembourg City, school with playground. --Cayambe 10:22, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Hard to see the chruch with those trees in the foreground --Poco a poco 13:25, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
  • I see a high quality images of a schoolyard with a playground and some tree. The school building is partially obscured by trees, but its not a quality problem imo. Clearly QI imo.--~~~~
  •  Comment Moved to Consensual Review after one negative comment (but not an 'oppose/decline') and one (unsigned) positive review. See above. --Cayambe 15:00, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Sorry, it was my signature.  Support--ArildV 18:30, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Per ArildV, good quality for me. --Manfred Kuzel 09:33, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Tournasol7 12:22, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 14:31, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Monument_morts_Romanèche_Hautecourt_Romanèche_7.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination War memorial of Romanèche in Hautecourt-Romanèche, France. --Chabe01 20:39, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment No FOP in France,sorry --Moroder 03:46, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose --Moroder 10:23, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 21:44, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Info Possible no FOP in France. I can't found the authors of this monument... but if it is no FOP it have to delete all photos from this category. Tournasol7 14:00, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment I guess the monument was made after 1945, therefore the artist should be dead before 1949 which is very unlikly imo --Moroder 09:06, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks more like a WW1 memorial with added WW2 data.--Ermell 20:41, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support The photo is fine quality-wise. If there's a problem with the license, it can be deleted later.--Peulle 21:49, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 14:32, 30 June 2019 (UTC)