Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 16 2020

• 
  • Nomination Hortus Haren. ‘Girl on the swing’. Artwork by Jeroen Boersma.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Drents-Friese Wold. Location Fochteloërveen. Biotope in the upland moor area.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Outbuilding of the Nicolaaskerk (Hemelum) is a hall church built in 1668.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bunker 24 im Ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:43, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manhole cover at special ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:43, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:47, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gable figures at Prinzipalmarkt 5, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:43, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St Lambert's Church, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:43, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grave “Wilhelm von Horn”, Überwasser cemetery, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:43, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plaque at the western keep of the bishop`s castle on Schlossweg #6, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Western keep of the bishop`s castle on Schlossweg #6, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bishop’s portal in the curtain wall (1685) of the former bishop`s castle on Schlossweg #6, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coat of arms and plaque of bishop Johannes VIII. Count of Goëss on top of the second doorway in the curtain wall (1685) of the former bishop`s castle on Schlossweg #6, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arcade yard of the former bishop`s castle on Schlossweg #6, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Temple complex. The Church of St. Basil, Archbishop of Caesarea. Chernavino, Volkhovsky district, Leningrad region --Александр Байдуков 02:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mt Reeves, West Coast --Podzemnik 00:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tarns by Yeats Ridge Hut, West Coast --Podzemnik 00:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:37, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Abandoned bee honeycomb --Charlesjsharp 21:08, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:35, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Museum of Natural History, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 17:32, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 19:21, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Museum of Natural History, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 17:32, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good balanced qualitiy photo --Michielverbeek 17:48, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Museum of Natural History, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 17:32, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:19, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Street "An Der Zech" in Trogen. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:40, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:49, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arthur Serrieres, winner of Xterra triathlon Prachatice. --janbery 16:16, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose shutter speed a tick too low IMHO --Poco a poco 17:50, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Greta Thunberg protesting in front of Swedish parliament in 2018. Good image of an historically important event. By User:Anderspangpang --Discostu 12:45, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Ok --Poco a poco 17:49, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A parnassius phoebus in the Frosnitztal. --Tesla 12:25, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A lake called "Auge Gottes"-translated "God's eye". --Tesla 12:25, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. The top of the mountain has a very slight green edge (it's more noticeable where it's adjacent with the clouds; have a look to the snow edges, too). It may be a little chromatic aberration, but it's not really annoying. Maybe you can address it anyway. --Lion-hearted85 17:31, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The "Gletscherlehrpfad Innergschlöss" --Tesla 12:25, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Nice shot, good quality. --Lion-hearted85 17:31, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunrise in the Venediger group. 6 AM. --Tesla 12:25, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Photo ride with railcar M240.113 on the line Vranovice – Pohořelice - railway station Vranovice --MIGORMCZ 12:06, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Photo ride with railcar M240.113 on the line Vranovice – Pohořelice - railway station Vranovice --MIGORMCZ 12:06, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Photo ride with railcar M240.113 on the line Vranovice – Pohořelice - railway station Vranovice --MIGORMCZ 12:06, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Photo ride with railcar M240.113 on the line Vranovice – Pohořelice - railway Halt Přibice --MIGORMCZ 12:06, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Photo ride with railcar M240.113 on the line Vranovice – Pohořelice - railway Halt Přibice --MIGORMCZ 12:06, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2-man Bobsleigh at the Bobsleigh World Championships Altenberg 2020/2nd run: Lamin Deen / Ben Simons (GBR). --Stepro 11:41, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2-man Bobsleigh at the Bobsleigh World Championships Altenberg 2020/2nd run: Rostislav Gaitiukevich / Ruslan Samitov (RUS). --Stepro 11:41, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Soccer, Germany, 2. Frauen-Bundesliga Nord, FC Carl Zeiss Jena - SV Berghofen: Anna Spitthoff (SV Berghofen, 13). --Stepro 11:41, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose This one is clearly below the bar IMHO --Poco a poco 17:51, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Джарилгацький маяк. --Константинъ 12:55, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose No details, it lack quality, looks like a phone picture --Podzemnik 00:53, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Шевченка, 1 (фрагмент). --Константинъ 12:55, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Tight crop, perspective correction needed --Podzemnik 00:53, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Port à Camaret-sur-Mer (Finistère, France).En tant que détenteur du droit d’auteur, je publie cette œuvre sous la licence suivante : --Gzen92 10:03, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:53, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Port in Camaret-sur-Mer (Finistère, France). --Gzen92 10:03, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 12:12, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lobster boat wreck from 1964 (MX195448) on the port in Camaret-sur-Mer (Finistère, France). --Gzen92 10:03, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 12:12, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sheep in Telgruc-sur-Mer (Finistère, France). --Gzen92 10:03, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Grass is overexposed --MIGORMCZ 12:17, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hamburg, cemetery Ohlsdorf, unused grave --Dirtsc 08:23, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:29, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hamburg, cemetery Ohlsdorf, memorial for the civil casualties in WW2 --Dirtsc 08:23, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tesla 09:51, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hamburg, cemetery Ohlsdorf, memorial for the german military casualties in WW2 --Dirtsc 08:23, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:29, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2 Budowlana Street in Świdnica --Jacek Halicki 07:44, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support GQ --Palauenc05 08:05, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2 Rynek Square in Świdnica --Jacek Halicki 07:44, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support GQ --Palauenc05 08:05, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 3 Market Square in Świdnica --Jacek Halicki 07:44, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:27, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 4 Market Square in Świdnica --Jacek Halicki 07:44, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:27, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 5 Market Square in Świdnica --Jacek Halicki 07:44, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:27, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marble bust of Gasparo da Salò in the town Hall Salò. --Moroder 07:21, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:47, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Deutschland, Erden an der Mosel, Hauptstraße 34 --Berthold Werner 07:13, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:47, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination egg of long-tailed skua - Oeuf de Labbe à longue queue --Ercé 06:53, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:48, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aulne Abbey during the morning civil twilight --Trougnouf 06:47, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:48, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hospice Herset in the Aulne Abbey --Trougnouf 06:47, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:05, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rectory in Neudrossenfeld --Ermell 06:07, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:31, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination War memorial in Neudrossenfeld --Ermell 06:07, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:58, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:03, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The castle in Neudrossenfeld seen from the south --Ermell 06:07, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:58, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:02, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former castle brewery in Neudrossenfeld --Ermell 06:07, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:58, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:02, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fountain in Neudrossenfeld --Ermell 06:07, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:58, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support technically good, but the beer bottle weakened the composition very much --George Chernilevsky 07:06, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An EMU800 train at Tai'an Station, Taiwan. --Ganbaruby 06:03, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Very good quality. And original uncropped vesion is better IMO --George Chernilevsky 07:01, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A TEMU2000 Puyuma Express train in Taiwan. --Ganbaruby 05:58, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support It seems like your focus is about 1-3 meters behind the train's front but considering it's a fast moving subject I think it's OK for QI --Podzemnik 07:58, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Христорождественская церковь: улица Большевиков, Вятская, Гоголя, Ленина, Слободской, Слободской район, Кировская областьЭто фотография памятника культурного наследия России c номеромЯ, владелец авторских прав на это произведение, добровольно публикую его на условиях следующей лицензии:Это изображение было загружено в рамках соревнования Вики любит памятники — 2020. --Ele-chudinovsk 05:07, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Not sharp enough, and on this site, it's expected for verticals to be vertical unless you have a special reason otherwise. -- Ikan Kekek 05:22, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Собор Успенский: улица Горбачева, 4, Киров, Кировская областьЭто фотография памятника культурного наследия России c номеромЯ, владелец авторских прав на это произведение, добровольно публикую его на условиях следующей лицензии:Это изображение было загружено в рамках соревнования Вики любит памятники — 2020. --Ele-chudinovsk 05:07, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose You have a beautiful sensibility, but this is not sharp enough to be a Quality Image. -- Ikan Kekek 05:19, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Церковь Михаила Архангела: Михайловка, Нагорский район, Кировская областьЭто фотография памятника культурного наследия России c номеромЯ, владелец авторских прав на это произведение, добровольно публикую его на условиях следующей лицензии:Это изображение было загружено в рамках соревнования Вики любит памятники — 2020. --Ele-chudinovsk 05:07, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Out of focus --Podzemnik 06:51, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Церковь Спасская: Вяз, Кирово-Чепецкий район, Кировская областьЭто фотография памятника культурного наследия России c номеромЯ, владелец авторских прав на это произведение, добровольно публикую его на условиях следующей лицензии:Это изображение было загружено в рамках соревнования Вики любит памятники — 2020. --Ele-chudinovsk 05:07, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose To small, tilted --Podzemnik 06:51, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Church of Archangel Michael in the town of Vyatskie Polyany --Ele-chudinovsk 04:59, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Beautiful composition, but not sharp enough and there's magenta chromatic aberration all over the bottom of the arch. -- Ikan Kekek 05:26, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pilgrimage church Maria zu den Ketten, Zell am Harmersbach, Germany --Llez 04:55, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:04, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Walking route along sand sculptures in the Kuinderbos-Flevoland. (Radio Oranje).
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:54, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Overgrown fairly wet habitat. Location, Stuttebosch in the lime valley. Friesland province.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:54, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Walking route along sand sculptures in the Kuinderbos-Flevoland. (Wood sculptures along the route).
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:54, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arrow tower: 36 Volkhovsky Prospekt (Staraya Ladoga fortress), Staraya Ladoga, Volkhovsky district, Leningrad region --Александр Байдуков 02:25, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, but the image isn't sharp. F/6.3 is too closed, at least f/10 would be better. --XRay 06:07, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kate McCreary House, Cape May. --King of Hearts 01:32, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:05, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lyttelton Harbour (Whakaraupō) from Mt Ada, Canterbury --Podzemnik 00:41, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:04, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Silos at the port of Karlsruhe --Asmodea Oaktree 11:34, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion It needs a perspect5ive correction --Michielverbeek 13:53, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
     Done --Asmodea Oaktree 16:04, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
    Air is noisy, but quality good enough for QI --Michielverbeek 06:38, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination federal Constitutional Court of Germany --Asmodea Oaktree 10:08, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    Too dark, building on the right hand side is not straight. Fixable? --Podzemnik 00:52, 13 October 2020 (UTC) I withdraw my nomination I don't know much about image processing. Withdraw to try it on my own time. --Asmodea Oaktree 11:17, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Town hall of Salò. --Moroder 04:51, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Comment There is a stitching error I have pointed out with a note: maybe it's fixable? Thank you --Lion-hearted85 10:47, 12 October 2020 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review --Moroder 15:18, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Thank you for the work. It looks better now and the quality is good. If you like to make it perfect, there are other less noticeable stitching inaccuracies you may want to fix. Also, I have noticed two dust spots in the corner. I have pointed out them in a note. --Lion-hearted85 00:15, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bust of Jan Sobieski: Summer garden, Palace alley, Central district, Saint Petersburg --Александр Байдуков 02:15, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:09, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lake near Zietenkopf. --Tesla 00:06, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Unsharp on the left, but good quality overall and very pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 01:50, 12 October 2020 (UTC)...@IntelTesla: Suggest you nominate for FP. Seven Pandas 22:26, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Swan pond in the Vittoriale degli Italiani in Gardone Riviera. --Moroder 19:28, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 19:36, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Said Francis in the Vittoriale degli Italiani in Gardone Riviera. --Moroder 19:28, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 19:36, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Historical photographic studio from Kirchheim unter Teck, Germany, in the Freilichtmuseum Beuren, NE view. --Aristeas 14:41, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 19:26, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wiki Loves Earth 2020. By User:Cacaromani --Rodrigo.Argenton 13:54, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Looks overprocessed --Podzemnik 19:26, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Frosnitzkees glacier--Tesla 08:58, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion I noticed a stitching error, and purple CAs on the very left side --PantheraLeo1359531 13:18, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
    thanks for the comment, I checked other non-pano versions of this photo, but thats the rock structure, no stiching error. --Tesla 15:31, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
     Done removed cas --Tesla 15:50, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
    Seems to be an issue of the browser. Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 16:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fenway, Boston. --King of Hearts 04:54, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    nice motif, but could you brighten the dark regions a bit? --Tesla 17:01, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
    Fixed --King of Hearts 17:18, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --IntelTesla 12:30, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weltgrößtes Riesenrad "City Star" 70m hoch, 48 Gondeln, Festplatz Bad Dürkheim, Rheinland-Pfalz, Deutschland. --Fischer.H 16:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn  Comment Leider nicht total frontal vor dem Riesenrad --PantheraLeo1359531 13:24, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
     Question Why was this set to "Discuss"? There is no positive or negative vote yet. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:47, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
     Comment I think PantheraLeo1359531 set it acidentaly to "Discuss", intead of just commenting or opposing. I set it back to "Nomination", so it won't pop up at CR tomorrow. PantheraLeo1359531 should change his comment to oppose if that was his intention. --Augustgeyler 22:24, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose Top is much too dark. Maybe it can be reprocessed ? --Trougnouf 09:40, 13 October 2020 (UTC)  I withdraw my nomination --Fischer.H 17:34, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Information board with a bunch of linguistic errors. --PantheraLeo1359531 15:54, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline It`s very easy to take such a photo. But with your german description isn`t a good enough fpr QI. There is only your point of view. --St. Krug 22:10, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lada Vesta Military Police Edition during the "Armiya 2020" exhibition.jpg. --Kirill Borisenko 00:47, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Queen Tower of Vincennes Castle, Vincennes in Val-de-Marne department, France. --Chabe01 22:44, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs perspective correction. --King of Hearts 04:07, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A view of Morlaix in July --NeoMeesje 17:32, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    Please provide some description. Also it's quite soft and the building on the left are leaning right, can you do something about it please? --Podzemnik 21:18, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Saint Barbara and Saint Joseph church. Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 16:10, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Metallurgy pavilion (former Kazakh SSR), North-Eastern district, Moscow --AlixSaz 15:30, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Nature protection pavilion (formerly "Building materials"), North-Eastern district, Moscow --AlixSaz 11:40, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Alai Minar at Qutub Complex, Delhi. --Syed07 09:19, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Dry valley above the Leinleiterquelle --Ermell 09:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Exterior of the lodging in Oinville-sous-Auneau (Eure-et-Loir, France). --Gzen92 07:50, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Information board of volunteer firefighter department Trogen. --PantheraLeo1359531 17:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    The door is leaning in --Poco a poco 19:20, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
    {info} Almost, the information board is crooked. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
    Sorry, I didn't get it, what do you mean? --Poco a poco 20:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
    No problem, the board is not vertical to the ground --PantheraLeo1359531 15:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
    Maybe, but the door should be straight --Poco a poco 19:32, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
     Done Image adjusted --PantheraLeo1359531 16:11, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:41, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A bakery sign in Trogen. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:00, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 07:23, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Art works on the ceiling of historical market inside the Red Fort, Delhi.. --Syed07 12:47, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 07:25, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Gobardanga Zamindar House at in North 24 Parganas district in West Bengal, India. (by Amitabha Gupta) --Atudu 02:30, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    Can we make verticals actually vertical? --Podzemnik 06:07, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
    @Amitabha Gupta: have a look.--Atudu 12:23, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
     Done- Vertical Distortion corrected. Please take a look.--User:Amitabha Gupta 22:07, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A person in blue standing next to a stop sign in Anseremme, Belgium --Trougnouf 20:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Do you mean "A person in blue"? "Blue human" sounds like the skin of that person should be blue --Podzemnik 06:07, 3 October 2020 (UTC)  Done You are right, she doesn't have blue skin. I fixed the description and title. Thank you ! --Trougnouf 07:32, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
    I'm not shure why this motif is particulary interesting --Tesla 18:08, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
    According to the advice here on Commons, consent is required before publishing an image of someone in Belgium. Did you get this person's consent to publish the image on Wikimedia Commons? --Bobulous 16:17, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
    Yes. I've added the consent template. --Trougnouf 20:00, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
    Have you shown the finac pic to the person? Because it's not so beneficial for her. And additionally, she's not a public person. --IntelTesla 12:35, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
    She picked it. I don't take a lot of portraits but my pictures end up here. I think the educational value is met as long as the image is well categorized and described. We never know if someone is going to be looking for a picture of a girl around the 2020's wearing a blue dress and closing her eyes next to a stop sign but if they ever do it's now easily identifiable thanks to the metadata and categories. Somewhat more realistically it could help an AI learn about these concepts. --Trougnouf 13:41, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support It's an odd scene, but I can't argue that the technical quality is sufficient. And the composition is fine, given the image description. --Bobulous 18:11, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chessington House, Ewell --Bobulous 16:48, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    matching technical QI criteria, but Chessington house is pretty much blocked from view --Virtual-Pano 08:36, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
    The house isn't open to the public, and this view is the only one visible without permission to enter the gate. Plus, I liked the front garden and the way its trees frame the entryway. --Bobulous 16:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
    I think too much on the left is out of focus, but that's my subjective opinion and I would neither support or decline. However the image should be categorized (you categorized the where but not the what), and if you have photographed the entrance to the house (all that's accessible) you should describe it as such. --Trougnouf 14:30, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
    Category added, description adjusted. --Bobulous 16:07, 11 October 2020 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 08:57, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Skulptur_"Searching_for_Utopia",_Jan_Fabre,_Nieuwpoort_(Belgium)_new_uploaded.jpg

• Nomination Sculpture "Searching for Utopia" Nieuwpoort, Belgium. --Gordito1869 07:31, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:36, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think it's worth a discussion, sorry. It's basicly a new upload from the declined picture below. With crop changed, but also blown very prominently. If you can fix the highlights, it's fine, but maybe this light conditions are only manageable with HDR. Btw. there's already a promoted QI of this motif from you, from another perspective where the lights aren't blown so strongly. --Tesla 09:46, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Tesla. The scene should be exposed to the right, this creates noise in the shadows which either is manageable by your camera sensor and denoising software, or requires HDR processing from multiple shots. --Trougnouf 11:15, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Sorry, 1. the light conditions were ideal (autumnal afternoon light); 2. gold shimmer in the sun, that was the effect I wanted; 3. my camera chip was able to capture this very realistically and with authentic true colors; 4. In this respect, my sun photo should differ significantly from this (a little strange) quality photo : File:Searching for Utopia, Nieuwpoort (DSCF9856).jpg --Gordito1869 07:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment I'm not saying that the lighting conditions or your camera is bad, but that part of the image (gold shimmer in the sun) is overexposed (or "blown"). I don't know if you know what it means so I will describe it here: once a digital camera sensor captures the maximum amount of light it can accumulate (eg 1.000 when the range is between 0 and 1), then it is saturated and there is no information left other than the area has maximum brightness. If you look closely then you will see that the area in question has one identical color, instead of a subtle gradient, which even bright white clouds and reflective surfaces should show. You can always avoid that with different settings on your camera, faster exposure time or smaller aperture to let less light in, because the opposite doesn't clip (areas that are very dark will have a values like 0.05,0.04,0.06 which are different values that can be increased in software, albeit at the cost of noise). Capturing an image with darker settings and fixing the lighting in software is often necessary when you have large differences between the shadows and highlights. You might find your image prettier than the one I took on a rainy day, but this assessment is about technical quality, and overexposure (or lack thereof in favor of that subtle gradient) is a technical requirement, especially when it's on the subject. --Trougnouf 08:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment - @Trougnouf : I trust my eyes and don't count megapixels; other users seem to trust my eyes too. You don't have to submit every photo, that has been post-processed via software due to bad weather conditions, for the QI candidacy. --Gordito1869 08:58, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment I don't see how criticizing my QI / work on non-technical criteria is relevant here, though you are welcome to provide your input when I submit images. If you don't see a value in post-processing then I'm afraid that many of your shots will not meet the COM:Image guidelines required for QI. Development / post-processing is most of the work that's required to meet these. I find that ideal lighting (golden hour) requires much more work than a cloudy picture like the one you pointed out (where there are no harsh lights). My lengthy response was meant to be helpful; most of what you can get out of this community is learning improved skills, and I wrote it out to save you some googling because you didn't seem to understand what "overexposed"/"blown" meant after a similar picture was rejected here. --Trougnouf 10:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support I think this is fine. -- Ikan Kekek 07:10, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination --Gordito1869 19:12, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Skulptur_"Umbra"_in_Ostende_(Oostende_Belgien)_von_Herlinde_Seynaeve_09-2020.jpg

• Nomination Sculpture "Umbra", Herlinde Seynaeve, Ostend (Belgium). --Gordito1869 16:48, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Tesla 17:57, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Too low detail. Perhaps too hardly de-noised. --Augustgeyler 08:01, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Moroder 08:54, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good enough. --Smial 10:12, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 11:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Newly_made_nail_02.jpg

• Nomination A nail just forged on the anvil --Kritzolina 11:18, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Insufficient quality: out of focus. --Peulle 13:18, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I disagree. Focus and sharpness seems fine to me --MB-one 20:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not in focus --Jakubhal 04:02, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per MB-one. "Good enough". --Smial 18:48, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Interesting scene, well composed. But DOF is very small. Bit too small in my eyes. --Augustgeyler 07:15, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 09:52, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Vergine_e_San_Girolamo_Emiliani_Andrea_Celesti_Duomo_di_Salò.jpg

• Nomination Painting of the Virgin which appears to Saint Gerolamo Emiliani. --Moroder 10:32, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support according possition of the camera is ok --Ezarate 21:18, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose There is no clear decision about what to show. If it's about the painting or the room? If it is about the painting the perspective is inadequate. --Augustgeyler 07:15, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment I corrected the perspective on the left right (sorry, I'm a physician ;-). Thanks for the hint. The decision was a painting in a room ;-) --Moroder 11:33, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support High-quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:29, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: Apart from the unnatural perspective, which makes the picture appear wider at the top than below, one question: Do you have the impression that the photo reproduces the colors of the painting even reasonably correctly? -- Spurzem 08:43, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment You have a pattern of asking me to justify votes others have made before me. Challenge Ezarate, instead. Meanwhile, you haven't voted. If you have a reason to think the colors are wrong, you know what to do. I see your point about the perspective but won't oppose or abstain on that basis. But you can. -- Ikan Kekek 14:11, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: I thought you could answer my question better; that's why I asked you. I will only vote here in exceptional cases and instead only ask on a case-by-case basis. Anyone can probably easily guess the reasons for this. -- Spurzem 20:48, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Well, I haven't noticed any reason to believe the colors are wrong. Ikan Kekek 02:06, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose Sharp enough, difficult to take. But I don't like the crop on the left high side. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:53, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support The painting looks good and sharp to me. I agree with Sebring12Hrs with the crop; I would try a less tight crop on the left high frame, if possible, although it's not crucial. --Lion-hearted85 12:40, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler (talk) 20:19, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

==

• Nomination --Ввласенко 08:44, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Conditional oppose -- if he is really a member of the European Parliament, certainly there must be a way to identify him? Please. --A.Savin 14:03, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment I didn't ask his name. -- Ввласенко 19:09, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

• This doesn't mean it cannot be found out afterwards. Perhaps someone from Commons:Wikipedians in European Parliament might help you. --A.Savin 10:17, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose Categories/description. As it is, this is just a man sitting on a bench. If he's described as a member of the parliament, he should be identified.--Peulle 06:56, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Done - I changed the name of the image ("In the courtyard of the European Parliament") and the category. -- Ввласенко 08:26, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support GQ --Palauenc05 10:52, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Spurzem 11:16, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment If the guy is not identified by the end of this review, I'll have to nominate the picture for deletion. Either this is really a Parliament member, but then, as evidence, he should be identified and placed into the corresponding category. Or this is actually a non-notable staff or otherwise a non-public person; in this case, the picture is likely a Personality rights' violation, as the consent for taking and distributing the picture is not obvious and, most likely, never asked for (looks like sort of "hidden camera" capture). Thanks --A.Savin 11:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment. I did not ask for permission to shoot as the object was located in a public space, a very popular tourist destination. -- Ввласенко 13:48, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

• It's not an object, it's a human and it has Personality rights. --A.Savin 15:28, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support It's illegal to shoot a photo of someone sitting on a public bench in Europe unless you ask for their permission? Meanwhile, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:33, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment It not illegal to take that picture, but to publish it. --Augustgeyler 10:00, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Question So there's really a presumption of privacy in public places? That's weird to me. -- Ikan Kekek 11:00, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

• There is, yes. It has been established through court cases between paparazzi photographers and celebrities. Although it may vary somewhat from country to country, here is the general idea: Anybody can photograph a public place, so if you walk down the street and somebody takes a photo of the street with you in it, you cannot expect to refuse them the right to do this. However, if the person is the main subject of the photo (rather than the surroundings such as the street), the privacy clause comes into play. Famous people in connection with participation in public events are usually excempt. In this case, the person is clearly the main subject of the image, but seeing as the person is not identified, personality rights could be an issue. If, for instance, this man objects to this image's presence on Commons, it will have to be deleted.--Peulle 12:20, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

• Exactly. If he is EP member -- all is fine (public person), but please identify him. If not -- consent for public upload of such a photo required. Thanks --A.Savin 13:44, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

• I see. Thanks for the explanation, Peulle and Alexander. -- Ikan Kekek 20:25, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
• I agree with A.Savin. If we can't proof he is a public person, the image can not be promoted.--Augustgeyler 21:42, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment In my opinion, now the requirement of consent has begun to be interpreted too broadly, even in those cases when the consent of the person being photographed is obvious. For example: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Two_girls._Schwerin,_Germany.jpg#File%3ATwo_girls._Schwerin%2C_Germany.jpg -- Ввласенко 18:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment In whose option? Please sign your comments. --Aristeas 14:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• @Aristeas: Sorry, I forgot to sign. -- Ввласенко (talk) 18:17, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• @Ввласенко: Thank you ;–). — I am with you in this case, both photos are IMHO nice examples of artistic street photography which has always been done without consent; but our world is ruled by professional politicians and lawyers, therefore these are IMHO very hard times for street photography, and I see no good chance to keep such photos, sorry … Only when you become very very prominent as a street photographer even lawyers will recognize that your work is not a crime, but street photography ;–). It’s a pity, but this is the era of lawyers, not of artists. --Aristeas 09:02, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose As there is still no proof if this man is a public person I have to oppose. --Augustgeyler 06:57, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose with Augustgeyler--Tesla 09:54, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment I've reluctantly pulled my supporting vote. If the photo is illegal to publish and that could cause some kind of legal trouble, we can't promote it and it should be nominated for deletion, instead. -- Ikan Kekek 19:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others, personality rights should be clear in this case --PantheraLeo1359531 19:44, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 20:20, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Iglesia_de_San_Pedro,_Viena,_Austria,_2020-01-31,_DD_07.jpg

• Nomination St. Peter's Church, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 07:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:52, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The picture with the dust cover in front of the Napapijri facade and the crane boom may be someday historically interesting. But the main motif mentioned in the image description is too distorted. In addition, you shouldn't want to take quality pictures of architecture on a rainy day. The white sky is not a quality sky. Maybe we hear other voices about it. --Spurzem 11:33, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose It is not about the weather conditions, but I am with Spurzem in terms of distortion. Especially the right part of the church shows too much perspective distortion.--Augustgeyler 07:38, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Spurzem. --Kallerna 20:00, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Augustgeyler, Kallerna There is a  new version, no crane, no distortion. Taking picture with bad weather, which is very likely in countries like this, is a blessing because there is almost nobody around --Poco a poco 22:08, 7 October 2020 (UTC) Pinging Poco a poco 18:02, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment The distortion changed. The image improved. But I am wondering about that blue traffic sign. Did you compress this part vertically or is this natural deformation by the lens? --Augustgeyler 21:47, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

• For this kind of questions we have the file history where you can realize that that sign always looked the way it looks now. I applied an aspect ratio change. My last version. --Poco a poco 21:56, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support The sky is a bit annoying, but that's not the photographer's fault. If this were FPC, I could easily reject the photo because of the light, but I consider this good quality here, as it looks pretty good at 80% at close range. -- Ikan Kekek 11:06, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Ikan has put it very well. --Aristeas 12:56, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan. --Vincent60030 10:13, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support The composition is a lot cleaner with the crane removed, and the main subject is more focused in the frame. With the last edits, the church looks better to me. --Lion-hearted85 12:29, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment @Poco a poco: please add the "retouched picture" template to the file information page, to say that the image has been manipulated to remove a crane. --Bobulous 18:17, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support IMO OK for QI. And it is not neccessary to add the retouched picture template, because the crane is not a fixed part of the composition. --XRay 18:25, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 20:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Zingzing_Bar_Suraj_Tal_Himachal_Jul19_D72_10907.jpg

• Nomination Looking from Suraj Tal down to Zingzing Bar, Himachal. Elev. 4,050m (13,287') --Tagooty 08:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
  
•  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:25, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose I disagree. Dust spots, snow seems to be blown --Podzemnik 06:31, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  
• @Podzemnik:  Done New version with dust spots removed, exposure reduced for snow, sharpening for detail in rocks. --Tagooty 10:47, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support Lacks a little detail, but good composition an dust removed.--Tesla 10:21, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support This is IMO better technically than the other one and sharp enough. --Ikan Kekek 14:17, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice composition. The new version has improved for me, too. --Lion-hearted85 12:18, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 15:51, 15 October 2020 (UTC)