Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 15 2014
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination St. Michael the Archangel church in Sienna --Jacek Halicki 22:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion QI imo --Lewis Hulbert 22:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Michael the Archangel church in Sienna --Jacek Halicki 22:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 22:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of St Michael, Camberley. --Lewis Hulbert 20:29, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:48, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A 2.5" hard drive that has been opened, exposing its inner workings. This is a 500GB Western Digital Scorpio Blue hard drive with SATA connections. This 2.5" hard drive is common in laptops. By User:Evan-Amos --Lewis Hulbert 19:27, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:07, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dome fresco in the Herzogenburg Abbey Church (Lower Austria) by Bartolomeo Altomonte --Uoaei1 17:19, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:48, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The pope at the windows in St. Peter --Livioandronico2013 16:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 17:15, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vatican Obelisk --Livioandronico2013 16:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too much contrast and traces of green CA Poco a poco 21:07, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Done Better? Gracias,for review. --Livioandronico2013 21:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Better, y de nada :) --Poco a poco 23:28, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Vatican Obelisk --Livioandronico2013 16:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Borgward Isabella Cabriolet with body by Karosseriewerk Karl Deutsch, Cologne -- Spurzem 16:02, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dormer windows : detail of a 19th-century house, Sers, Charente, France. --JLPC 13:30, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination South view of the hills towards road D 143 and valley of the (small) river Velonde, Saint-Amant-de-Montmoreau, Charente, France. --JLPC 13:30, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:07, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bronze statue (copy) by Antonio Rizzi (Guide d'Italia, Venezia. Touring Club Italiano 2007, page 254) seen from the Doge's Palace courtyard "Cortile dei Senatori" in Venice --Moroder 11:14, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:07, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Inanam, Sabah: City Bus Terminal (North) - Terminal Bas Bandaraya (Utara) --Cccefalon 10:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tenom, Sabah: Shops in the town center of Tenom --Cccefalon 10:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tamparuli District Office (Pejabat Daerah Kecil Tamparuli) --Cccefalon 10:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sipitang, Sabah: Muslim with Taqiyah, pushing his bicycle through a street in Sipitang --Cccefalon 10:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saints Peter and Paul church in Raszków --Jacek Halicki 10:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:35, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saints Peter and Paul church in Raszków --Jacek Halicki 10:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 13:30, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of A Guarda, Galicia -G23 --Lmbuga 09:27, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:01, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of A Guarda, Galicia -G24 --Lmbuga 09:27, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:01, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of A Guarda, Galicia -G25 --Lmbuga 09:27, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:01, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of A Guarda, Galicia -G26 --Lmbuga 09:27, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:01, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chandelier in St. Peter --Livioandronico2013 09:10, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 12:38, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Carnival of Bagolino 2014 - Hat detail --JeanBono 08:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry, Chromatic noise,
chromatic aberrations. Bottom areas seem blurry (I'm not sure because there is too much noise)--Lmbuga 10:05, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tunnel in the fort of Feyzin. --JeanBono 08:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry but noise in the dark part. --Livioandronico2013 21:22, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Apis mellifera on a Gaillardia pulchella near Saint-Martin-Vésubie, France. --JeanBono 08:47, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Red halo around the flower and not really sharp. A tough shot, though. --Poco a poco 21:07, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eberhard Gienger, german gymnast at Olympics Games 1976 and politican of Bundestag --Ralf Roletschek 12. Sept. 2014
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 12:42, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination MS Silverpilen outside Utö in Stockholm archipelago. --ArildV 08:25, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:16, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Royal Crescent, Bath, England --Poco a poco 08:20, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:09, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination King's Bath, Bath, England --Poco a poco 08:20, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality--Lmbuga 08:35, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villajoyosa, Spain --Poco a poco 08:20, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality, in spite of the cable--Lmbuga 08:42, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pulteney Bridge, Bath, England --Poco a poco 08:20, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice.--ArildV 08:26, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grand Pump, Roman Baths, Bath, England --Poco a poco 08:20, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 12:38, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gabriele Schmidt, german politican of Bundestag File:14-09-12-Eberhard-Gienger-RalfR-041.jpg--Ralf Roletschek 12. Sept. 2014
- Promotion
Support Good quality--Lmbuga 08:25, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Volker Kauder, german politican of Bundestag --Ralf Roletschek 12. Sept. 2014
- Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 08:18, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kordula Schulz-Asche, german politican of Bundestag --Ralf Roletschek 12. Sept. 2014
- Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 08:18, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Details of Grain elevators --ArildV 06:43, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination HSTs at Paddington. Mattbuck 06:27, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Thames Quay in fog. Mattbuck 06:27, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality --Ralf Roletschek 12. Sept. 2014
-
- Nomination River Thames. Mattbuck 06:27, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kimanis, Sabah: Lighthouse of Kimanis Maritim Traffic Monitoring Station --Cccefalon 04:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Blurry, definitely not a QI --Poco a poco 08:33, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Omg, this is indeed not a QI.I withdraw my nomination --Cccefalon 11:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sipitang, Sabah: Shops in town center --Cccefalon 04:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:33, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panorama of Oria --Livioandronico2013 23:59, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Not sharp I'm afraid. -- KTC 21:38, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Door of Jews - Oria --Livioandronico2013 23:19, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality, looks overprocessed. --Uoaei1 17:39, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rouen, France: Fountain in the town hall park ("Jardin de l'hôtel de ville") --Cccefalon 18:37, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion It's a little bit lop-sided to left. -- Spurzem 18:56, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Absolutely no. I have three referencing verticals for the photo and none of them is leaning to the left. I hope you don't speak about one pixel. --Cccefalon 21:44, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
I said it would be only a little bit. All the other is very good. -- Spurzem 05:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, I appreciate your reviews even when I have to insist every now and then. --Cccefalon 07:06, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panorama of Finestrat Beach, Finestrat, Spain --Poco a poco 16:50, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:39, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Granadella Beach, Javea, Spain --Poco a poco 16:50, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 12:33, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villajoyosa, Spain --Poco a poco 16:50, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion QI -- Spurzem 06:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moyne Friary, County Mayo, Ireland --Brackenheim 11:53, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion good quality for me--Johanning 22:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Germany, Baden-Württemberg, Schwetzingen castle --Berthold Werner 08:54, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Hight quality picture IMO if you improve the roof of the right--Lmbuga 11:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Improve in which way? --Berthold Werner 08:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, I'm not sure. It may be silly: I like more left roof than right roof because dark transverse lines protrude too, are very sharp, they cause the other lines seem blurred. Sorry, it's a very good picture and I don't know if it's improvable--Lmbuga 09:50, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
I see the difference and have no idea to improve it. --Berthold Werner 13:42, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Office building in Arenastaden, Solna (Stockholm). Headquarters of the Swedish Football Association. --ArildV 07:25, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good, but please, remove the 2 dust spots (see notes) --Poco a poco 18:39, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Done Thank you.--ArildV 08:13, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palazzo Barberini fresco --Livioandronico2013 23:55, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Barrel distortion visible on the long edges. What is the size of this fresco? --Uoaei1 06:15, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Done I don't know the size, I didn't have a meter with me
--Livioandronico2013 08:06, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Ok now. And I am just curious for your estimation --Uoaei1 06:15, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
I'm joke, i don't know the misure but was very big....i think type 8x3 meters, thank you --Livioandronico2013 08:26, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Ebro river, in Miranda de Ebro, Spain.--Jebulon 20:11, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Comment Clear and strong halo (see note), too much noise IMO, the detail could be better (see people)--Lmbuga 11:34, 11 September 2014 (UTC)You are right, Lmbuga, thanks for review, this is not, and cannot be, a QI.
I withdraw my nomination.--Jebulon 13:54, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ottoman Grayling (Pseudochazara mamurra) --Zeynel Cebeci 20:34, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion QI for me-- Holleday 07:02, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination False Grayling (Arethusana arethusa). Mersin, TR. --Zeynel Cebeci 22:02, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion QI for me -- Holleday 07:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A roundabout with the Rust ball sculpture near Luleå, Sweden. By User:Tortap. --Blue Elf 19:16, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion A tiny bit of noise, but an overall QI for me. --Lewis Hulbert 22:43, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Citrus x limonia in a black background --Rodrigo.Argenton 19:16, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion QI for me-- Holleday 07:08, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ahirkapi Roman Orkestrasi playing Qanun (instrument)--Yelkrokoyade 17:53, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry,no very sharp and a bit of noise. --Livioandronico2013 20:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eglise Saint-Léger, à Guebwiller, France. --ComputerHotline 16:55, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Perspective needs a correction, e.g. the altar is not horizontal. Can you also get the lights a bit down? --Uoaei1 17:40, 6 September 2014 (UTC) Done, with ShitN and DxO. --ComputerHotline 07:53, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Info I see no new version! --Uoaei1 16:11, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Beautiful sharpness butNot done Mattbuck 00:22, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Couvent des Dominicains, Guebwiller, France. --ComputerHotline 16:53, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Perspective problems (see ceiling) --Uoaei1 18:41, 6 September 2014 (UTC) Done, with ShitN and DxO. --ComputerHotline 07:53, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Info I see no new version! --Uoaei1 16:11, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Beautiful sharpness butNot done Mattbuck 00:22, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Couvent des Dominicains, Guebwiller, France. --ComputerHotline 16:53, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Tilted cw --Uoaei1 17:40, 6 September 2014 (UTC) Done, with ShitN and DxO. --ComputerHotline 07:53, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Info I see no new version! --Uoaei1 16:11, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Beautiful sharpness butNot done Mattbuck 00:22, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Couvent des Dominicains, Guebwiller, France. --ComputerHotline 16:53, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Decline The chairs ay the lower right spoil the composition. --Mattbuck 00:22, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel in Wolany 2 --Jacek Halicki 12:58, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Decline JPEG artifaction in the trees. --Mattbuck 00:22, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gänsemarkt (illuminated with yellow light), Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:14, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Nasty patterns around the lights. Overexposure in these cases should just be accepted - tone-remapping it to grey never leaves a good effect. --Mattbuck 00:22, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oldenburg Central Station, Germany --Jacek79 16:58, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Good but there is red/purple CA and pixelation in the sky Poco a poco 15:07, 6 September 2014 (UTC) - Decline Bad pattern in the sky top right. --Mattbuck 00:22, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Oldenburg Central Station, Germany --Jacek79 16:58, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palatine Hill and Circus Maximus, Rome, Italy --XRay 13:17, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry no, this is NOT the Forum Romanum (wrong description, wrong categorization. Please correct (very easy, with a minimum of care)--Jebulon 13:58, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Fixed Sorry. It's really wrong. Description and categories are updated.--XRay 06:06, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Significant lack of detail at the left. Mattbuck 00:10, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sea bridge, Valencia, Spain --Poco a poco 09:25, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 00:10, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination La Merced convent, Elche, Spain --Poco a poco 16:21, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St John of the Cross church, Valencia, Spain --Poco a poco 16:21, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town Hall in Kazimierz --Daniel.zolopa 17:02, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Lovely composition but blurry on the left and too dark. --Mattbuck 23:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Photo of a billabong at Berrinba Wetlands, Berrinba, Logan City, Queensland, Australia. By User:Shiftchange --Gnangarra 08:40, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Lots of blur. --Mattbuck 23:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Audi A3 8V --Berthold Werner 06:56, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Comment. Rather dark and license plate is smeared. Is both correctable? -- Spurzem 09:46, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Now it's brighter. --Berthold Werner 11:29, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
OK to me. Mattbuck 23:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC) - Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Audi A3 8V --Berthold Werner 06:56, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The M5 at night. Mattbuck 06:53, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Sorry. It's very, very dark. --XRay 13:15, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Yes, it is very dark, it was a dark night, the point was the contrast. However, looking at it again I don't feel the distance is sharp enough. Mattbuck 23:51, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nave of the former Carthusian monastery church Aggsbach, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 07:17, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Vertical correction is needed for the altar is lop-sided. -- Spurzem 17:34, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Done Perspective corrected --Uoaei1 19:19, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
@Spurzem: Can you please check my correction? --Uoaei1 09:01, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
I'm afraid I think too much of this is too soft to be QI. Mattbuck 23:13, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dorfkirche, Quarten, Switzerland --XRay 00:07, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
Comment CA with lack of fine detail. I guess it's hard to get better photo with this camera. --Iifar 18:54, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Fixed I just tried improvments.--XRay 15:49, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Significant loss of detail in the grass. Mattbuck 23:08, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Michael Archangel church in Bystrzyca Kłodzka --Jacek Halicki 19:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
Comment The shadow on the left is a little bit disturbing, the church is leaning in.--XRay 12:33, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Not done Mattbuck 23:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Velkua school in Naantali, Finland. Makele-90 21:56, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
Comment Another crop is recommended, CAs at the tree on the right and the building is leaning in. An english description is necessary. IMO it's correctable.--XRay 17:19, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Not done Mattbuck 23:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination One of the entrances of the Velkua school in Naantali, Finland. Makele-90 21:56, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- Decline This has the potential to be a nice QI. But please crop away a considerable amount of the gravels and remove differnt flavours of CA. I left several annotations. --Cccefalon 11:31, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Not done Mattbuck 23:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hong Kong City in Big Budha Tian Tan --The Photographer 14:16, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
Comment The image is titled CCW (please look at the gate) and noisy. May be correctable? --XRay 17:25, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Not done Mattbuck 23:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Protests Venezuela in Altamira Square --The Photographer 14:16, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
Comment The image is tilted CCW and noisy. May be it's fixable ... --XRay 17:25, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Not done Mattbuck 23:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: View of Shkodra, Albania --Poco a poco 14:54, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- Review Strong distortion, look like compact camera shoot --The Photographer 13:28, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Not sure about your comment there is nothing I wouldn't expect of a wide angle lens for this type of shot. Poco a poco 13:36, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Christ the Redeemer (by Ribeiroju) --ArionEstar 12:55, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Some dust spots, rather red. Mattbuck 09:02, 7 September 2014 (UTC) - Decline
Not done --Mattbuck 22:44, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Christ the Redeemer (by Ribeiroju) --ArionEstar 12:55, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Market Square, Nottingham. Mattbuck 06:57, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- Decline 1/3 left a bit blurred --Christian Ferrer 10:41, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
I can't really do anything about that unfortunately. Mattbuck 17:30, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Blurred on the left . --Livioandronico2013 20:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Alhambra_evening_panorama_Mirador_San_Nicolas_large_pano_0EV_sRGB.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Evening view of the Alhambra as seen from Mirador de San Nicolas in Granada, Spain --Slaunger 19:30, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Oppose Sorry, very nice view, but important parts are very blurred --DXR 19:37, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review, DXR. Have you considered in your review that it is +60 Mpixel image? If you look at the same photo downsampled to 10 Mpixels it is crisp when viewed in 100%. I think it is unreasonable to pixelpeep at resolutions larger than the equivalent to 10 Mpixel in a QIC review, which is still much more than minimum resolution. Moving to CR to hear the opinion of other reviewers. --Slaunger 21:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, Slaunger, don't get me wrong, but I do not think that the 10Mpix version is crisp (I also think that 1500 pix on the short side is a bit problematic for a panorama) and the single shots are clearly blurred. I get the pixelpeeping argument about corner softness etc., but a panorama of many unsharp images will struggle to be an QI in my opinion. It really is a bit of a technique error, but something that happens to everyone of us from time to time. Just avoid shooting at ISO 100 and 1/40, (ISO 400 and 1/160 would certainly have given you better results) especially if you can downsample in post. --DXR 08:23, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, DXR, but I do not understand why ISO 400 and 1/160 s would have been a better choice? The photos were all taken with the camera mounted on a rugged tripod and are based on the middle of three raw exposures separated by 2 EV, and I had a 2 sec delay from pressing the shutter button. My mediocre sensor is pretty noisy at ISO 400. Why should going to a faster shutter time help? Downsampling is irreversible and will always lead to information loss. If you want to make a large scale print, it will always be better to use the full resolution version as compared to the a downsampled version albeit it may be soft on a pixel level. The downsampled version will suffer from pixelation when scaled up again to full scale. If I had nominated the 10 Mpixel version as a single shot with that quality it had surely been a QI. The technique used should not be determining for it to be QI-worthy or not. Just because you know it is a stitch of many individual single shots is irrelevant for the QI assessment of the image as such. It is a way for me to mitigate that I have entry level DSLR gear. This is QIC not FPC. --Slaunger 20:37, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- Slaunger, I find it hard to believe that your gear is to blame. A 600D is a good camera and certainly not the limiting factor and as you rightly say, DOF is neither. I do not believe that your lens will produce images that are so blurred either, since sites like photozone show decent sharpness figures in tests (and also your plane shots are nicely sharp!). To my eyes the images simply look blurred due to camera shake or some other movement of sorts. I know that my camera will sometimes produce blurry files even mounted on a good tripod since mirror slap is significant. Perhaps your camera was also exposed to wind or comparable factors, perhaps the IS malfunctioned. I am confident that your equipment is capable of producing much better results and it is probably more useful to enquire why that was not the case instead of arguing that any large image will get QI if downsampled or viewed at small sizes (which is of course true, unfortunately). When I consider a QI, I think I should also ask if some random user would be happy if they printed the file based on its resolution, which is pretty large here, and the result would probably be a no. Please do not take this as personal criticism, but wouldn't it be more helpful to try figure out the reasons for the flaws in quality of your panorama to improve upon it in the future? (Feel free to continue this disc on my talk page) --DXR (talk) 22:24, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, DXR, but I do not understand why ISO 400 and 1/160 s would have been a better choice? The photos were all taken with the camera mounted on a rugged tripod and are based on the middle of three raw exposures separated by 2 EV, and I had a 2 sec delay from pressing the shutter button. My mediocre sensor is pretty noisy at ISO 400. Why should going to a faster shutter time help? Downsampling is irreversible and will always lead to information loss. If you want to make a large scale print, it will always be better to use the full resolution version as compared to the a downsampled version albeit it may be soft on a pixel level. The downsampled version will suffer from pixelation when scaled up again to full scale. If I had nominated the 10 Mpixel version as a single shot with that quality it had surely been a QI. The technique used should not be determining for it to be QI-worthy or not. Just because you know it is a stitch of many individual single shots is irrelevant for the QI assessment of the image as such. It is a way for me to mitigate that I have entry level DSLR gear. This is QIC not FPC. --Slaunger 20:37, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, Slaunger, don't get me wrong, but I do not think that the 10Mpix version is crisp (I also think that 1500 pix on the short side is a bit problematic for a panorama) and the single shots are clearly blurred. I get the pixelpeeping argument about corner softness etc., but a panorama of many unsharp images will struggle to be an QI in my opinion. It really is a bit of a technique error, but something that happens to everyone of us from time to time. Just avoid shooting at ISO 100 and 1/40, (ISO 400 and 1/160 would certainly have given you better results) especially if you can downsample in post. --DXR 08:23, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Unsharp, probably focus problems. --Iifar 05:27, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- Iifar Highly unlikely to be a focus problem. At 55 mm focal length and f/7.1 and a shooting distance of approximately 1500 m, the DOF extends from 22 m in front of the camera to infinity according to the DOF calculator at dofmaster. Maybe my autofocus is not accurate, but it is not that inaccurate. I think the problem is that my kit lenses are pretty bad and give a washed out appearance in full resolution. --Slaunger 20:37, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Oppose sorry, but clearly unsharp in full view --Taxiarchos228 07:00, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Unsharp due to double contours in vertical direction mainly in the middle and the left side of the image. Maybe stitching error, maybe motion blur, maybe defective image stabilisation. -- Smial 23:31, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the reviews. I have come to the conclusion the quality issue is due to mirror slap in combination with insiffient tightening of the grip for azimuth angle control on the tripod. -- Slaunger 11:41, 14 September 2014 (UTC)