Commons talk:Wiki Loves Monuments
Hello, I and others recognized that there are some countries that made a facebook page. But there seems to be a problem, the legal terms of facebook and the free licenses from the images from Wikimedia Commons (exept public domain images) seem incompatible. Please clear this and remove images from facebook if necessary. Best regards --Pustekuchen2014 (talk) 10:18, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- @Pustekuchen2014: Should we probably avoid advocating "please share this on Facebook" for works under a ShareAlike license? I think that the incompatibility happens when trying to share a CC-BY-SA work on Facebook. If I'm reading m:Legal and Community Advocacy/CC-BY-SA on Facebook correctly, importing CC-BY-SA content from somewhere else (for example, from Wikimedia Commons) to Facebook is a violation of the license because it would not really be "sharing alike" due to the additional terms imposed by Facebook. Though, it should be ok for someone to publish a photo on Facebook mentioning they are licensing it under CC-BY-SA and then importing it to Wikimedia Commons, or to re-publish their own photos anywhere. whym (talk) 11:41, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- @Whym: CC-BY-SA licensed pictures from Commons to facebook: no. CC-BY-SA licensed pictures from facebook to Commons: generally yes. Because when you upload a picture to facebook you grant a non-exclusive license to facebook so they can use it. Because it is a non-exclusive license they can also be published under CC-BY or CC-BY-SA or CC0. But uploading CC-BY or CC-BY-SA pictures to facebook and you are not the photographer violates the license and is not okay. But I am not an advocate, I just noticed this problem and wanted to communicate this. Regards --Pustekuchen2014 (talk) 12:13, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Discussion about importing Wiki Loves Monuments lists into Wikidata
I'd like to bring your attention to a conversation on the Wikidata project chat about migrating the information in the Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) database to Wikidata as part of the Connected Open Heritage project.
Hello, I just saw by chance a picture uploaded at this competition categorized in a way I thought it was wrong so I looked and saw that every WLM-picture seems to be categorized that way (so maybe it’s right I thought …):
For example has a German, Bavarian image from the 2016' competition the categories Category:Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Category:Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Germany and Category:Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, DE-BY of wich is one the subcategory of another.
Now I thought this is a clear cause of Over-categorization because it seems not to be the given exception. So I want to ask: Why is this made this way? Best regards, KPFC 💬 21:37, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- First thing to be aware of is that it are no content/topic categories you refer to (categories about subjects), but contest categories. With contests we want to have an overview of images per country, but also an overview of all the images in one single category. Romaine (talk) 00:55, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Feedback needed at: Wiki loves X
Translatathon for WLM templates
just as I was editing the cultural monuments template for Saxony I thought that maybe a translatathon sometime in spring next year would be great to get as many translations of templates for WLM 2019 as possible. Translating one sentence per template isn't that much work either. Braveheart (talk) 11:21, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Lack of central discussion forum
The Wikimedia Foundation just sent out a mass email to donors which I think links to the December blog post ‘Monumental’ winners from the world’s largest photo contest showcase history and heritage. I am seeing various emails come in through Commons:OTRS with comments about this.
There are lots of Wiki Love Monuments project pages. There seems to be no central discussion forum where people can gather to discuss the competition.
I propose to have many talk pages redirect to one central place, perhaps this talk page, for any page which low traffic and which could reasonably redirect to a central general forum. I do not expect to take quick action on this, but I do think this is urgent. We get lots of comments about Wiki Loves Monuments but seem to not have any on-wiki forum for people to discuss it generally. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:44, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Structured Data on Commons and Wiki Loves... campaigns: wishes for UploadWizard?
Benefits include multilinguality of Commons files (users can find and describe files on Commons in many languages), and machine-readable data with better APIs, that offer more advanced possibilities to build applications like Monumental.
In the not so far future, you will also be able to organize Wiki Loves... (Monuments, Earth, Africa, Art, Love, ...) campaigns on Wikimedia Commons with structured data. (This is entirely optional, but maybe some of you are already keen to do this, especially if you already have monument or other data in Wikidata!)
In the course of 2019, the SDC development team wants to improve Wikimedia Commons' UploadWizard to support the campaigns that want to be powered by Structured Data 'new style'.
Do you have ideas and wishes for this? The team wants to hear which structured data features you want to see in UploadWizard, and we are now organizing a consultation about this over the next two weeks. This page gives more context, and links to where you can leave feedback. We're collecting this first round of input until April 17. Many thanks in advance for all your ideas! SandraF (WMF) (talk) 12:07, 4 April 2019 (UTC)