User talk:ArkadiuszZ

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, ArkadiuszZ!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:24, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warszawa Kościół Matki Boskiej Loretańskiej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good; but there is a fat dust spot and some bird spots in the sky (please clean). --A.Savin 19:01, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done New version uploaded --ArkadiuszZ 06:57, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Support OK. --A.Savin 09:35, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Ostróda location map

[edit]

Hej. Obie mapki są potrzebne? File:Ostróda location map(1).png, File:Ostróda location map.svg. pjahr @ 20:23, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Łomża - kaplica cmentarna cmentarz wojskowy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI.--Jebulon 16:33, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katedra św. Michała Archanioła w Łomży.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perspective correction necessary. --Cccefalon 04:49, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done--ArkadiuszZ 05:28, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:13, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Szablon zabytek

[edit]

Używa Pan starą (błędną) formę szablonu : tak jest źle ((zabytek|PD|A-956 z 30.06.2152)) a tak jest dobrze ((zabytek|PD/A-956 z 30.06.2152)). Zostało to już wyjaśnione w tym szablonie: "((Zdjęcia poniżej ożywają starej formy szablonu "Zabytek" i mogą nie być poprawnie skategoryzowane w podkategoriach "Category:Cultural heritage monuments in ... Voivodeship‎". Jeśli możesz to sprawdź kategorie i zmień format. Zdjęcia te docelowo powinny zostać skategoryzowane pod własnymi kategoriami, a wtedy szablon "Zabytek" powinien zostać przeniesiony do kategorii zabytku i usunięty z opisu pliku. Pozdr. Gdaniec (talk) 14:55, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mapa Marek z Open Street Map ma błędny przebieg granic miasta.

[edit]

Mapa miasta Marki, którą zrobiłeś na podstawie danych z OSM w 2014 roku, konkretnie File:Marki location map(1).png ma niewłaściwy kształt granic miasta (np. jezioro Czarne jest przecięte granicą, natomiast rzeczywiście znajduje się całkowicie w granicach Marek). Poprawiłem ostatnio przebieg granicy miasta na podstawie strony [1], stąd moje pytanie czy mógłbyś wykonać nową wersję? Chciałem zrobić to sam, ale wydało mi się to dość skomplikowanym zadaniem po chwili zabawy w jednym z programów do renderowania map z OSM. Nie wiem jak dokładnie to robiłeś, ale jeśli masz po prostu gotowy kod na wyrenderowanie tego w taki sposób, że granica jest niebieską linią, reszta jest taka i taka, to nie powinno zająć to zbyt długo. Crusier (talk) 13:29, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dębki – słup graniczny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Superb bokeh, very nice! And extraordinary sharp where it has to be. --Basotxerri 18:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pomnik Chrystusa Króla w Świebodzinie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Kroton 18:28, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pałac Zamoyskich w Kozłówce 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 17:06, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katedra św. Michała Archanioła w Łomży (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:46, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]