User talk:Brooklands263
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 00:46, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block. See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.
|
Martin H. (talk) 10:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
This account is a Confirmed sockpuppet of User:CaliforniaImages, User:DimSum38, User:OompahLoompah and User: Photoflexing. Some of those sockpuppets including this account are Confirmed sockpuppets of an long term abusive editor whos action are summarized under the name Marquis de la Eirron. The relation of the sockpuppets named above and the sockmaster has been confirmed independently on English Wikipedia and on Commons. In sum all sockpuppets of that user have enough problematic edits to fill an own wiki with it. Some of the past sockpuppets had lost of blatant copyright violations. The sockpuppets named above also have problematic edits, there are various deletion request, there are files where the author - studio owner or employee of a studio - has been described as "unknown" while infact the names of possible authors are clearly known by lists of studios employees or at least by an authorship asumption to the studio operator as a work of joint authorship. I see no reason to unblock this sockpuppet and allow the sockmaster to continue their disruptive work. --Martin H. (talk) 12:50, 16 May 2014 (UTC)