User talk:Gunnex

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Gunnex!

TUSC token 4d635d0c75e8df244cca700eb0bad6a7[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Violando???

Caro companheiro aonde estou ferindo os direitos autorais das imagens que estou carregando sendo elas por lei propriedade pública conforme lei federal de meu país!!!???

TUSC token b952a2f1be790d2ba212657d0dbc0883[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Historic Center of Quito - World Heritage Site - thanks for categorizing[edit]

Historic Center of Quito, an area of 790 acres with 130 monumental buildings in addition to 5,000 properties that are registered with the the municipality of Quito as heritage properties.


Historic Center of Quito - World Heritage Site - thanks for categorizing

Autoria de Fotos e Fonte[edit]

Boa noite. Eu realmente sou o usuário Riopretense (http://www.panoramio.com/user/4072219) no Panoramio. As mesmas fotos estão no Flickr sob meu nome, Gustavo. As fotos são de minha autoria (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Parque_do_rio_Preto.jpg). Já coloquei a fonte para a colagem de fotos (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Colagem_de_S%C3%A3o_Jos%C3%A9_do_Rio_Preto_(3).jpg).

Obrigado— Preceding unsigned comment added by Creedence (talk • contribs)


Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Gunnex. You have new messages at Darwinius's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rodrigo Gracie[edit]

Oi, Peco desculpas.Erro meu Estarei uploading uma foto minha. Obrigado— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodrigo Gracie (talk • contribs)

Re:File:Blas de Otero.jpg[edit]

Re: eliminação para ficheiroBarreiras , BA, dia ensolarado na cidade Rio Grande[edit]

O arquivo supra citado é de minha autoria. Tirado no dia 8 de junho de 2017.

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Gunnex. You have new messages at Petillés's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Back?[edit]

Hello are you back? I am happy, I wish you a good day. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:04, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

@Christian Ferrer: Thx! More or less... merely surfing around ...unforeseen free time. A nice day for you too! Gunnex (talk) 19:40, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Re: Marcação da imagem File:Cid Carvalho EBC.jpg[edit]

Prezado,

Quando carreguei tal imagem, a mesma ilustrava a matéria utilizada como fonte. Houve alguma mudança no site e a imagem não consta mais, portanto, está correta a eliminação do arquivo.

Sem mais,

Viniciusmarvin (talk) 00:26, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Permission for the copyright Images[edit]

Dear Sir

Thank you for the message and i shall correct myself in future. To make it truth; i didn't intentionally upload the images however it was a relevant images for the content in the wiki page leaving the copyrights, am sorry for that. Now to get permission on Copyright images, can you advice how can i get permissions from the source for the relevant images I have uploaded / in future if required to upload any further images.

Also How do i know the images are under copy right protection.

Please advice. Thank You. Ashik. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 115.249.62.130 (talk) 11:39, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Flickr[edit]

Can I add my Flickr images here if I am the original uploader but published them on Flickr on a different license or should I delete them there first? --The Ivory Cowboy 🤠 (talk) 06:25, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

@The Ivory Cowboy: Hi! Did you read COM:FLICKR? If you are the copyright owner you may set & change the license of your Flickr files to a license compatibel to COM:L and upload them to Commons. Don't forget to tag your uploads from Flickr with {{flickrreview}}. See also: Change your photo's license in Flickr. Hope, that helps. Gunnex (talk) 06:37, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
@Gunnex: This is a globally locked sock account [1], so if you see any similar accounts, you can report it to me on my talk, if they're not locked already. Daphne Lantier 21:41, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Planta, e prospecto do Forte de N. S. do Monte do Carmo.jpg[edit]

Hallo Gunnex,

auch ich freue mich ebenso wie Christian über Deine Beiträge. Willkommen zurück!

Genügt bei dem Foto nicht eines der Old-Templates, ähnlich wie bei File:Planta do Forte São João (Vitória).jpg? LG --Hystrix (talk) 09:58, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi @Hystrix: Danke für die Grüße. Bei dem Kunden (siehe auch Special:Diff/253914960 vom gleichem Uploader) ist mir irgendwie die Maus entglitten. Den Unsinn habe ich rückgängig gemacht. Danke für das Auge! Hinweis: ich war in den letzten Tagen u.a. auch hinter uploads (größtenteils ab 2016) her, die mit einer brasilianischen Quelle bzw. URL .com.br als Quelle versehen waren. In vielen Fällen war eine CC/PD-oder-was-auch-immer-Lizensierung nicht gegeben --> in der Regel checke ich die jeweilige Quelle – sofern ein Link angegeben wurde – teilweise bis ins wayback. Es sein denn, die Quelle ist mir bekannt (brasilianische Presse-Seiten/Portale etc.), dann drücke ich gleich den Knopf. Die Tageskategorien von Category:Media missing permission ab dem 23.07. sind daher an manchen Tagen etwas "voller" als gewöhnlich... dürften so um die +300-400 uploads betreffen... Gunnex (talk) 17:10, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

João Doria Jr.[edit]

So you've been adding the category Agência Brasil related uploads affected by license change in some files, like File:João Doria Jr em reunião do PSDB.jpg, haven't you? What if I told you that the same file by the same source is available under flickr under a valid license? ([2])

I honestly wonder if you get paid to do this kind of job. Holy Goo (talk) 17:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Good, I see you removed the category from the João Doria file. Now I need to let you know that ALL images from Agência Brasil are also on flickr. You might want me to go look for the flickr url for every single image or, more wisely, you can just delete the category since you know that all images are also on flickr. It's your choice. Which one takes the least effort and is more rational? Holy Goo (talk) 18:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

@Holy Goo: Thx for the Flickr source. See Special:Diff/254055691. Me and other are aware of the problem that Agência Brasil are inconsistent in there license policy. See also advice at Category:Agência Brasil related uploads affected by license change (which is primary a maintance category, to reflect current status). You can help to clear some files if you are interested. Note that {{EBC}} is responsible also for {{TV Brasil}} which needs checks too. "since you know that all images are also on flickr --> no, I can't confirm this yet. Can you? Gunnex (talk) 18:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Well, I can't say I'mm 100% sure, but as far as I remember, no image has been uploaded on their website that hasn't been also uploaded on flickr. The licenses are inconsistent, but that's because very few agencies or companies take copyright laws in an extremely strict manner like people here at Commons do. They are files made by our government, it's as simple as that. Well, there is no way I can put the flickr source in every single image. It'd take forever. Even if I put the flickr source in the images that are important for me, it would already be a ton of work. Holy Goo (talk) 18:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
@Holy Goo: Are you somehow trolling me? I also read your recent comments on ptwiki like "Duvido que eles serão inteligentes o suficiente para chegar a essa segunda conclusão. E depois dizem que sou nervoso" (pt:Special:Diff/49487168). Is this the trigger which already lead to an indef block ("Intimidation/harassment") here on Commons (which was cancelled later on by some individual action)?
If you want to help, check e.g. this image on related Flickr stream = File:Aloysio Nunes recebe o Xeque Abdullah Bin Sultan Al Nahyan 01.jpg. A spontaneous search at Agência Brasil Flickr stream was not successful. Try to get it – and I would be grateful. For all cases: unless we have a definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming these files as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host them on Commons. That is not a "extremely strict manner like people here at Commons do" --> that is treating normal copyright issues, considering Wikimedia Commons as a host of material that is licensed under a free license that specifically and irrevocably allows anyone to use the material for any purpose. Unfortunately, uploads from Brazilian users are (on average) mostly critical (probadly due to education lacks regarding copyrights). See e.g. my ongoing analysis via User:Gunnex/Cross-wiki uploads from pt.wikipedia.org.
In other words, Wikimedia Commons is daily flooded by hundreds of copyright violations – and thousands of them are remaining still undetected. So, please respect the work of users (including me), which are trying to keep Wikimedia Commons as a (for everybody) useful, free licensed database of all kinds of works. Thank you very much. Gunnex (talk) 19:42, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
I thought you were german, but now I see you have a good knowledge of portuguese, so maybe you even live here in Brazil, I don't know. I don't like it when people stalk me on other projects, but nevermind.

Anyway, look. The problem with Commons is that people here are extremely strict. Not even american government agencies like NASA are so strict. These contradictions (files with different licenses in different sources, like in this situation) happen often here because nobody really cares about these specific details. EBC clearly doesn't mind that we use their files (they even want us to use them) because they are a government agency, and that is more than enough. Now we're having problems on the portuguese wikipedia because people here intend to delete images of our own presidents that were taken by our own government! How insane is that??

Since you admit that the majority of files uploaded here are copyvios, why be so strict on files that are NOT copyvios (like the Aloysio Nunes file)? Look, all Wikimedia projects have a very bad reputation due to unreliability, so why don't you worry about all the tons of actual copyvios and simply stop fighting over minor details? That's what gets on my nerves. Nobody really gives a damn about these details. Holy Goo (talk) 20:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

I have been here on Commons for months and honestly I don't think I'll ever manage to get into the spirit of this community. It's just too much for me. Have a nice wikibreak. I'm going to take a break as well. Holy Goo (talk) 01:54, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Wiki break[edit]

Sunset at Huntington Beach.jpg Gunnex is taking a short break and will be back at Commons .

Redirects without permission?[edit]

Hi Gunnex,

schon dreimal sind mir Redirects untergekommen, die von Dir mit No permission versehen waren. Die Weiterleitungen habe ich gelöscht und jeweils die Dateien mit dem entsprechenden Hinweis versehen (File:Pedro Pedrossian.jpg, File:Pedro Teruel.jpg und File:Luiza Erundina durante campanha eleitoral em 2016.jpg). LG und eine erholsame und erfolgreiche Wiki-Pause wünscht Dir Hystrix (talk) 16:19, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Re: File:DilmaCamisaPalmeiras.jpg[edit]

Hello, Gunnex! Please, see if you're right now. The photo is official of the Presidency of the Republic of Brazil and has been reproduced by several press agencies, since the use is free. I hope it's correct now. Sorry for my weak English. DanteCan (talk) 22:27, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Hey I just wanted to say thank for all the work trying to clean up the ABr files. That's good work! :) ~nmaia d 11:21, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Category:Agência Brasil related uploads affected by license change/checked[edit]

Die Hauptkategorie ist jetzt erstmal leer, d. h. die unfreien Bilder sind komplett aussortiert. Möchtest du die erstmal nur sammeln, oder sollen wir die jetzt schon komplett zur Löschung anmelden? De728631 (talk) 16:47, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi @De728631: danke für die Unterstützung in dieser Sache! Den einen oder anderen Kandidaten konnte ich noch retten, aber für die derzeit 202 Bilder in dieser Kategorie (die ich nahezu alle mal persönlich in die Hand genommen habe) würde ich sagen: Löschantrag = ✓OK – und zwar eher sofort. Willst Du den LA stellen? Als dringlich sehe ich noch die Entsperrung der Vorlage {{Agência Brasil}}, um dort einen Hinweis wie z.B. hier einzubauen. Gunnex (talk) 22:04, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Die Sprachversionen außer Englisch sollten eigentlich nicht geschützt sein (DE, PT und PT-BR sind auf jeden Fall frei verfügbar). Wenn du magst, kannst du also dort entsprechende Hinweise eintragen. Ich werde dann mal die Massenlöschung anschieben und Template:Agência Brasil/en anpassen. De728631 (talk) 21:17, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
LA: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Agência Brasil related uploads affected by license change/checked De728631 (talk) 21:49, 18 August 2017 (UTC)