User talk:Krd

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning
If your question is why a specific file has been deleted or how it can be restored, please advise on initial contact that you have read COM:L and COM:VRT and why this doesn't answer your questions.

Questions from users who appear to have not read the mentioned two pages will be ignored.

Warning
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day. For the archive overview, see archive.

Gelöschte Fotos von Gonfaloni

[edit]

File:Livo-TN-Gonfalone.jpg, File:Breguzzo-Gonfalone.jpg etc.

bitte mal erklären,

  1. warum die einfach ohne Diskussion gelöscht werden
  2. auf welcher rechtlichen Grundlage wer genau ein Urheberrecht/Diritto d'autore/Copyright haben soll

Aus meiner Sicht eindeutig Schutzrechtsberühmung Sukaq (talk) 05:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ich warte immer noch auf eine Erklärung, warum ohne Diskussion über 60 meiner Fotos gelöscht werden. Keiner der Beteiligten in diesem Verfahren konnte mir bisher darlegen, warum die Gonfaloni einem urheberrechtlichem Schutz unterliegen sollen.--Sukaq (talk) 13:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Idea for abuse filter

[edit]

Hello Krd, I had an idea for an abuse filter to help stop self promotional content. Where would the best place be to discuss this? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 04:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. If the discussion should be kept confidental, I think you can contact an admin directly who is involved with abuse filters. Krd 04:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you recommend any admin in particular? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 04:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, sorry. Krd 05:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It was reported on my talk page User_talk:MGA73#Vandalism-related_help that some users vandalize and mass tag files with no permission. This user mass tagged and you deleted at least some of the files. I checked a few and they were from YouTube. Some are no longer available but some are still there. I think that for example File:DoMixi1989.jpg and File:20181013 Nguyễn Phương Hằng at Talkshow.png looks good. I have not checked the other files. And there may be files marked by other users. --MGA73 (talk) 15:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This File:Jun Vũ in Chọn Đâu Cho Đúng (2).png was even reviewed by a license reviewer. So it should at least have been changed to a DR. --MGA73 (talk) 16:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo, thank you for the heads up. I have restored two more files, but the rest doesn't look really good to me. If this oocurs again in any way, please let me know. Krd 19:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Krd, this is obviously a case of vandalism. They tagged the files as NPD today yet the date in the template is September 12th, see Special:Diff/926462275, so that the files could be deleted in a blink of an eye, before anyone could do anything. A lot of those files you deleted have valid licenses and don't need permission because they are own work, screenshots from YouTube video by legitimate copyright holders e.g. File:NGỌC TRINH VÀ SIÊU MẪU VÕ HOÀNG YẾN KHOE VẺ RẠNG RỠ TẠI HẬU TRƯỜNG VIFW SS18.webm, files already reviewed by a license reviewer e.g. File:Sơn Tùng M-TP hát Chín bậc tình yêu tại đêm nhạc An Thuyên 27s.jpg (if there's something wrong, it'd be better to bring it to DR instead of tagging it as NPD), photos taken by a photographer in Flickr and freely licensed e.g. File:20090626 Ngô Thanh Vân, Johny Trí Nguyễn.jpg. There are several that indeed violate copyright and these should be deleted but these are only several among hundreds of correctly licensed files. Please look more into this case because too many files were wrongly deleted, compared to only a few correctly deleted. Even if some files may need permission, the uploaders should be able to have 7 days to resolve the issue. While in this situation, they have barely have anytime. For example File:20090626 Ngô Thanh Vân, Johny Trí Nguyễn.jpg, the moment the file was tagges NPD was 04:15, and then it was deleted at 06:22, so that was... less than 3 hours.  Băng Tỏa  20:36, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't disagree. It appears all images are already restored. Thanks to MGA73 for their work. Krd 03:46, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revive time

[edit]

I think you need to revive the deleted Vietnamese artists photos with @MGA73. Even only me just cannot revive it. Thanks. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 17:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Which exact files do you think of? Krd 19:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think some photos that you have deleted it before. Photos of the artists like Tran Thanh, Suboi, Karik, Phung Khanh Linh, etc. So much. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 09:26, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Everything I'm aware of and is possible has already been done. If there is something more, please provide links. Krd 12:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Krd, I have links for you: File:MIN tại sự kiện 2020-03-21.png (screenshot from a CC YouTube video) and File:Tóc Tiên, Trấn Thành và Dương Anh Vũ tại Siêu trí tuệ Việt Nam.jpg (own work). Please restore these. Thanks in advance.  Băng Tỏa  17:33, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --Krd 17:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another list:

Extended content

Thanks a lot in advance.  Băng Tỏa  18:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

image deleted with reference to fop

[edit]

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Good_On_Ya_Alberta_(31488297137).jpg

Could you please email me or otherwise send me that image? Or tell me what was pictured in it? I have no clue what it contained and would like to see it to understand more properly why it was deleted. Gryllida (talk) 02:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image prominently contains advert poster. Krd 03:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Local upload of Astana file

[edit]

I asked for temporary restoration of File:Central Downtown Astana 2.jpg, for potential local upload, but it seems I wasn't fast enough. I just now noticed the message of 17th September on it having been restored. Could you please re-restore it? Sorry for the inconvenience. –LPfi (talk) 18:37, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Krd 05:31, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Now locally uploaded at en-voy. –LPfi (talk) 16:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Krd 05:31, 22 September 2024 (UTC)