User talk:Mike Peel/Archive 13

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

→

Archive 20

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westgate Water Tower, Lincoln.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 06:09, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zebu (ship, 1938) bow and starboard side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment "Category" shouldn't be visible in the scope. Have a look at other nominations in edit mode to see how they avoid that, and thanks for the nomination! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:19, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
  • @Ikan Kekek: Fixed, thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 06:31, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support After looking at all the pictures in the category, I agree that this one is best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:46, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment I fully support that this can become a valued image if the scope will be modified accordingly. There are better pictures of the Zebu's deckhouse, the bowsprit, stern... So I would like to suggest a less generic scope and go for something like Zebu (Ship,1938) bow and starboard side (please take a look at the other vessel and car VI nominations for reference and translate this into nautical terms --Virtual-Pano (talk) 18:03, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
  • @Virtual-Pano: Feel free to change the scope as you'd like? Another option might be 'overview'/'full ship' or similar, since the other photos focus on smaller areas. I also took most of them, I think, but wasn't planning on nominating them. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:11, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Zebu (ship, 1938) to Zebu (ship, 1938) bow and starboard side --Mike Peel (talk) 18:29, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support with a less generic scope --Virtual-Pano (talk) 18:17, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment OK with me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:35, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pasadena City Hall 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:10, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin holocaust memorial 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:11, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seal Beach pier huts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:11, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City of Seal Beach Marine Safety Department.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:20, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ships in Portsmouth 29 - D34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 17:26, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ships in Portsmouth 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toad at HartRAO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:13, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DSS 51 in 2014-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 20:29, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruby's, Huntington Beach pier, California.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 18:59, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

You bot

…keeps reverting human curation. Please make it stop, we know better: This Commons cat is about a Russian slang word that means "dick", and the repeatedly pushed link to Wikidata is about a more generic concept: "dick jokes". Now, I understand that the problem is in Wikidata, but I’ve tried to fix it and apparently it didn’t stick. I don’t wish to waste my time with Wikidata more than the strictly necessary, but this is annoying and detrimental for Commons. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:19, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

@Tuvalkin: this was the edit you were missing, Pi bot was copying over from that. Let me know if it happens again in this case. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 15:13, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Oil rig "Ester"

Fyi Mike, I identified this and the distant rig from a map on Commons back on 17 October 2021. At that time, I added this Caption: Oil platform "Ester" (state lease) and distant "Edith" platform (federal lease- "Beta Field". This was related to the 2021 Orange County oil spill. I found this map [1] on Commons, cropped it[2] and added to the spill's page. This spill's Wikipedia page was more complete than most commercial media reporting at that time. -- Ooligan (talk) 16:15, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

@Ooligan: Nice work! And sorry for missing your 2021 edit, I don't often look at captions. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:44, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. I will change and add new information in the description as well in the future. -- Ooligan (talk) 21:15, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zebra at Pilanesberg National Park 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MeerKAT prototype dish in 2014-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 11:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A.J. Summers Memorial Tower, Seal Beach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:25, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Rose Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good but verticals of the left buildings should be vertical. --Sebring12Hrs 20:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC) @Sebring12Hrs: Thanks for the review, I've tweaked it, does that look better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 09:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Sebring12Hrs 06:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zebra at Pilanesberg National Park 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support May be a bit grainy, but good enough. --Sebring12Hrs 11:59, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holliston Church 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment May be a bit tilted to the left. But may be I am too much strict. --Sebring12Hrs 07:50, 18 October 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:56, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ships in Portsmouth 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ships in Portsmouth 18 - Commodore Clipper.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 04:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernsehturm Berlin 2014-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giraffe at Pilanesberg National Park 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks tilted --Poco a poco 08:21, 17 October 2022 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Rotated, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)  Support I'd have gone further, but ok I guess --Poco a poco 08:44, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2019 536.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and nice composition --FlocciNivis 21:01, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2018 052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 18:07, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iron age settlement at Pilanesberg National Park 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:40, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirador astronómico de Sicasumbre 2022 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not an easy object and... Good quality. --Terragio67 17:35, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirador astronómico de Sicasumbre 2022 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:22, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa Museo del Campesino 2022 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 17:42, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ships in Portsmouth 19 - D23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 07:38, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin holocaust memorial 2014-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:18, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirador astronómico de Sicasumbre 2022 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 16:23, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the port of Las Palmas 2022 038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 16:23, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Lanzarote 2022 096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirador astronómico de Sicasumbre 2022 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 20:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 05:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodega El Grifo 2022 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 05:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pneumatic driven capstan, Portsmouth Historic Dockyard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ships in Portsmouth 18 - D23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ships in Portsmouth 31 - F78.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:24, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cumbrian Fisher Nassau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 17:33, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Fundación César Manrique 2022 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 07:09, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Fundación César Manrique 2022 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 14:37, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa Museo del Campesino 2022 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 14:37, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Lanzarote 2022 097.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:29, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodega El Grifo 2022 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 14:37, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lanzarote Aeronautical Museum 2022 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 07:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lanzarote Aeronautical Museum 2022 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 04:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Society - Robert Boyle notebook 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:05, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WightLink St Clare 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 06:57, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Canyon Railway 29 2015 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 06:57, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WightLink Wight Ryder I 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 20:27, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HMS Warrior in 2013 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:59, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pasadena City Hall 2013 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:12, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus heermanni on Seal Beach pier 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 08:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DSS 51 in 2014-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 08:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pasadena City Hall 2013 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 06:15, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WightLink St Clare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:51, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirador astronómico de Sicasumbre 2022 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giraffe at Pilanesberg National Park 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:23, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giraffe at Pilanesberg National Park 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:14, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zebra at Pilanesberg National Park 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:23, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SANSA Hartebeesthoek station 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:21, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. What's about reviewing the same number of photographs as nominated? --XRay 14:49, 2 November 2022 (UTC) @XRay: Thanks for the review! I try to review when I can, will try to do more. Thanks. Mike Peel 16:55, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Argenberg 19:33, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 13:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Lanzarote 2022 104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Lanzarote 2022 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 08:30, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Lanzarote 2022 131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Lanzarote 2022 132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 13:57, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Lanzarote 2022 118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 12:06, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 17:47, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Palmetum de Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2022 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zebra at Pilanesberg National Park 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 08:38, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Little Moreton Hall 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 09:20, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Classic Cars in Tenerife 2022 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 09:19, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lanzarote Aeronautical Museum 2022 090.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 15:29, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nelson's Ship in a Bottle 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 12:38, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morro Bay 2015 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:28, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morro Bay 2015 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 15:07, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birdoswald 2014 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:52, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Classic Cars in Tenerife 2022 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments reflections are distracting --Charlesjsharp 11:51, 7 November 2022 (UTC) @Charlesjsharp: Not much I can do about them, sorry. Thanks. Mike Peel 19:47, 8 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Disturbing reflections are no QI criteria. --Uoaei1 06:32, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Classic Cars in Tenerife 2022 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments reflections are distracting --Charlesjsharp 11:51, 7 November 2022 (UTC) @Charlesjsharp: Not much I can do about them, sorry. Thanks. Mike Peel 19:47, 8 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Disturbing reflections are no QI criterion --Uoaei1 06:33, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Lanzarote 2022 142.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:38, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Lanzarote 2022 143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments do we need both candidates? --Charlesjsharp 19:33, 6 November 2022 (UTC) @Charlesjsharp: Up to you / other reviewers? They are both similar quality. Maybe support one, oppose the other? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:48, 8 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:38, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:48, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zebra at Pilanesberg National Park 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --J. Lunau 18:54, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de San José 2022 73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:24, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:40, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antoni van Leeuwenhoek letters to the Royal Society 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:22, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de San José 2022 71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 07:33, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Little Moreton Hall 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 07:47, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DSS 51 in 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:09, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Traction engine (BS 8432).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:17, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lyme Park 2014 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:08, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ordsall Hall 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:18, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:37, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:37, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:55, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:37, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buckler's Hard Maritime Museum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:39, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Housesteads Roman Fort 2014 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 17:21, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Classic Cars in Tenerife 2022 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --J. Lunau 18:12, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Classic Cars in Tenerife 2022 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, IMHO meets all QI criteria --J. Lunau 18:12, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:At Manchester 2018 052.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:34, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 11:45, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jornadas WMES (MP) 2022 101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 03:21, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antoni van Leeuwenhoek letters to the Royal Society 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 16:17, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jornadas WMES (MP) 2022 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:25, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Society - Robert Boyle notebook 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:14, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Classic Cars in Tenerife 2022 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 16:25, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de San José 2022 74.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unfavorable cropping (disturbing palm frond at left edge of image) and sloping horizon (tilt to the left), fixable? --F. Riedelio 16:50, 18 November 2022 (UTC) @F. Riedelio: Thanks for the review. I've rotated it by 0.5° and cropped the palm frond, does that look better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 16:11, 19 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 16:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lyme Park 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please crop to image borders (white triangles top and bottom left). A geotag would be also welcomed. --C messier 17:40, 16 November 2022 (UTC) @C messier: Thanks for the review. Image cropped (oops), and coordinates added. Thanks. Mike Peel 19:26, 18 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 16:14, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirador astronómico de Sicasumbre 2022 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jornadas WMES (MP) 2022 048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit blurred. Some noise in the central part. Sharpening and denoising may help. --Tagooty 03:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC) @Tagooty: Thanks for the review. I've uploaded a new version with sharpening and denoising turned up. Thanks. Mike Peel 16:05, 19 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thanks. --Tagooty 14:51, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaulieu River views 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 10:25, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DSS 51 in 2014-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 12:34, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jornadas WMES (MP) 2022 110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 11:17, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DSS 51 in 2014-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 13:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

File:John Lennon en el museo de la Casa del Cine de Almería WMES2022.jpg

Hello: the photograph "John Lennon en el museo de la Casa del Cine de Almería WMES2022.jpg" was taken in a museum. The criterion that I follow in museums is to ask if photographs can be taken. When the museum authorizes taking photos, it is understood that it has managed the rights of the exhibited works, in the appropriate way. María Sacristán (talk) 11:16, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi @María Sacristán: I just replied by email, but will also give the response here. It's normally complicated. Museums often have permission to display images like that, but they can't give reproduction rights to visitors. It is different if the photo only includes them in a small way. It's also normally different when photographing 3D objects in a museum. However, photographs with the main subject of a recent photograph in a museum is normally not OK. The simplest option might be to check with the museum and, if it is OK, then consider sending confirmation to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team . Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 11:20, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, very interesting, I'll read it carefully. María Sacristán (talk) 11:33, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:26, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:26, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DSS 51 in 2014-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:30, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bressay Bank, Hout Bay 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:31, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jornadas WMES (MP) 2022 085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but recommend the {{Wikipedia-screenshot}} template for the Wikipedia content :) --PantheraLeo1359531 19:04, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirador astronómico de Sicasumbre 2022 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:31, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CARMA 2012 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 20:02, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DSS 51 in 2014-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some CA on the antenna.--Peulle 08:22, 22 November 2022 (UTC) @Peulle: Thanks for the review. Could you point out where the residual CA is please? I can't spot it. Thanks. Mike Peel 20:18, 23 November 2022 (UTC) Spot of CA around the secondary mirror structure (though you have to zoom past 100% to make it out). Looks good otherwise. --Hemmers 11:17, 28 November 2022 (UTC)@Hemmers and Peulle: Thanks, I see what you mean. I've had another go at removing it now, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Hemmers 20:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MeerKAT prototype dish in 2014-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:47, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sony Centre, Berlin 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:47, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bressay Bank, Hout Bay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:28, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Villa-Lobos 2018 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:09, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johann Wolfgang von Goethe monument in the Tiergarten, Berlin 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:15, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johann Wolfgang von Goethe monument in the Tiergarten, Berlin 2014-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:13, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johann Wolfgang von Goethe monument in the Tiergarten, Berlin 2014-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:15, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johann Wolfgang von Goethe monument in the Tiergarten, Berlin 2014-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 16:10, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johann Wolfgang von Goethe monument in the Tiergarten, Berlin 2014-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 16:10, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Paulo 2018 287.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:13, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2018 237.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:35, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2020 718.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:13, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Lanzarote 2022 069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Will be useful to include the name of the work and creator, and a description. I thought it was her gravestone! --Tagooty 00:09, 3 December 2022 (UTC) Comment: Please, remove the white outline from the bottom and right of the image, then it will be good quality. --Terragio67 05:53, 3 December 2022 (UTC) @Tagooty and Terragio67: Thanks for the review. White outline removed (oops!). The creator is "Evelina Martín Rodríguez", the name of the work is "Jareas", I don't know much more than that! Thanks. Mike Peel 08:44, 3 December 2022 (UTC)  Comment May be it will help: [3] --XRay 08:49, 3 December 2022 (UTC) (UTC)  Support Thanks, Good quality now. --Terragio67 12:10, 3 December 2022 (UTC) Thanks. @XRay: I've added info from that ref to Jareas (Q115486510) and Evelina Martín Rodríguez (Q115486527), which are used in the photo description. Thanks. Mike Peel 12:56, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trentham Gardens 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:37, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trentham Gardens 2015 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:37, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trentham Gardens 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:56, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2022 052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:10, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2022 053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2022 057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:24, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2022 055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:57, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Fundación César Manrique 2022 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:35, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:35, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trentham Gardens 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 09:02, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trentham Gardens 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 09:02, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2022 058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:40, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2022 059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:47, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2022 071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:47, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2022 072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Not a rooster? -- Ikan Kekek 22:36, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Teide Observatory 2022 053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 17:04, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 19:29, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2022 054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:36, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hospital Universitario de Canarias 2022 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:54, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:54, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 142.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 17:09, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:54, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays

Happy New Year!

Happy Holidays and Happy New Year, Mike!

The other day, I was having a conversation with someone about holiday cards and social media. It occurred to me that, in the years since I left Facebook, the site I use most to communicate with people I like isn't actually a social media site at all. If you're receiving this, it's pretty likely I've talked with you more recently than I have my distant relatives and college friends on FB, at very least, and we may have even collaborated on something useful. So here's a holiday "card", Wikimedia friend. :) Hope the next couple weeks bring some fun and/or rest. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  19:54, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C-BASS South at Klerefontein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:14, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2021 0358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Argenberg 22:49, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA should be removed. --Ermell 20:25, 21 December 2022 (UTC) @Ermell: Thanks for the review. I checked and CA has been removed, where can you spot residual CA? Thanks. Mike Peel 21:11, 21 December 2022 (UTC) No changes visible. Sorry. --Ermell 21:23, 21 December 2022 (UTC) Tweaked version now uploaded. Thanks. Mike Peel 08:45, 25 December 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:01, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Mass use of depictor

Hello When I am using Depictor or Wikicrowd its always manual job. Every time you get image and you press yes/no to tell if its this person/object sam as on Wikidata (Depictor) or just "is this a bridge" (Wikicrowd). There is no way to automate it (its something like "human OCR"). Only "higher amount of edits that are not manual" is when I am using AC/DC ("mark all photos in this category as >present XYZ on images<"). It can be visible from outside that "it looks like PMG is bot" because I am quite good in editing (I am person with highest number of edits on pl.wiki). And its not first time that someone thinks that I am bot. With flood flag issue is that it should be turned on on my account on commons non stop - I am making this edits since September 2021. And as far as I know flood flag is assigned for limited time. I will try to request it now. On pl.wiki I am admin, so I am turning this flag on by myself (and its accepted by community that I can gave it for longer period of time). PMG (talk) 11:51, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Requested. PMG (talk) 12:10, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

@PMG: Just to say thank you for requesting the flag and having that discussion. I'm surprised by the outcome, but as long as the community is happy with how things stand, that's good with me. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:17, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Mike Peel/Archive 13,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:39, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Username query

Gooday Mike and a belated Happy New Year to you. What's the correct commons protocol for dealing with a suspected block evader? (New registration cloning an existing file). This is carrying over from En editing, and I'm more familiar over there. Thanks.--82.13.47.210 14:26, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

I'd report it over at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems (I think that's the relevant subpage of Commons:Administrators' noticeboard...) Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 14:28, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

OK, thanks, I'll stick with it further as there's more yet to trawl through on the En side.--82.13.47.210 18:35, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:41, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:55, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Palmetum de Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2022 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:41, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Palmetum de Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2022 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:41, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2022 061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 21:38, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Arucas 2022 052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:28, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:46, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:54, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 19:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Strong perspective distortion that should be fixed. Also there is a huge oblong dust spot on the sky in the middle of the picture. --Jakubhal 13:58, 15 January 2023 (UTC) @Jakubhal: Thanks for the review. Perspective tweaked. Oblong unidentified object removed (no idea what caused that - not in previous or next photo!). Thanks. Mike Peel 14:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Ok, Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:29, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:29, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted in ccw direction (look at the sea level) and a lift of the shadows would help --Poco a poco 16:46, 14 January 2023 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Thanks for the review, both now done. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:39, 14 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted in ccw direction --Poco a poco 16:46, 14 January 2023 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Thanks for the review, rotated, is that better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:51, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Castillo de San Gabriel 2022 76.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:04, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Lanzarote 2022 055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:04, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2020 1104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 20:24, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2018 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Overcategorization should be removed. --Ermell 10:28, 21 January 2023 (UTC) @Ermell: Thanks for the review, overcategorisation removed. Thanks. Mike Peel 20:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:54, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Playa de las Américas 2020 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:50, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Playa de las Américas 2020 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is some CA --Poco a poco 12:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Thanks for the review. I forgot to upload the corrected version, please could you have another look? Thanks. Mike Peel 13:54, 22 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:48, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palm-Mar 2020 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:37, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Lanzarote 2022 057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:50, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Málaga 2022 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you apply a perspective correction? --Poco a poco 20:40, 23 January 2023 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Perspective tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 09:14, 26 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:15, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Málaga 2022 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Statue too dark. Perspective could be improved. --Tagooty 08:37, 23 January 2023 (UTC) @Tagooty: Statue lightened, perspective tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 09:24, 26 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality, thank you --Tagooty 10:05, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lanzarote Aeronautical Museum 2022 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:45, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Traction engine (NU 3041).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:00, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Traction engine (BS 8432) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:00, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Manchester 2018 096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 21:31, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Manchester 2018 099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:50, 29 January 2023 (UTC)  Comment This composition, in better light, could be an FP if you use a better camera and get it really sharp and unnoisy. -- Ikan Kekek 18:53, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frankfurt Airport Skyline 2017 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Surprisingly good quality for an iPhone photo.. --Cayambe 13:52, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

File:At Museo de la Naturaleza y el Hombre 2023 003.jpg

Hi Mike, any information about the sculptur or installation-year? Assuming this statue is located indoors, it might not be covered by Spain's FoP-exception. --Túrelio (talk) 07:42, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

@Túrelio: Thanks for the tags for the other photos! For this one, there wasn't a sign next to it, so there's just what is written below the bust (which is readable if you zoom in). I'm not sure if it counts as indoor or outdoor TBH, see File:Museo de la Naturaleza y el Hombre 2019 002.jpg for the setting (you can just see the bust on the right-hand side). It is a recent bust, though, so if FoP doesn't apply then it'll have to be deleted. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:51, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Sorry for replying late. Problem is that Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Spain#Freedom of panorama is rather scarce; we don't have jurisprudence/explainations as detailed as those for Germany. So, if you prefer to be on the safe side, tag it with G7. I will not pursue the "case". --Túrelio (talk) 16:40, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

@Túrelio: Thanks, I've now deleted it, since there is doubt. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:22, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

A request

Hello Michael! Could you please delete the first image version of File:The constitutional names as well as the native names (in Eastern Nagari and Latin transliterations) of the 3 official languages of the Indian Republic that use the Eastern Nagari writing system as their official scripts.jpg? I uploaded an image and later reuploaded another image in the same file. I don't want the existence of the previous image even in the revision history because it is appearing in the Wikipedia article pages where this file is used. For example, in the desktop version of the Wikipedia page w:Eastern Nagari script, the previous version is appearing but in the mobile phone version of the same Wikipedia page, the current version (latest version) is appearing. --Haoreima (talk) 04:16, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

@Haoreima: I think it is OK to leave it as it is. It should only be appearing due to cache - try purging the page (add ?action=purge to the URL) and it should update there. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 09:21, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Unfortunately, it still is showing the former one in desktop version. I tried it as per your instructions. It is almost five days ago I reuploaded the new image but still not working. How does it appear to your screen in desktop version? And, is there any formal way to delete it exactly like wikipedia's local images were deleted after reuploading a newer version (though the motives aren't similar)? --Haoreima (talk) 09:46, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

@Haoreima: I've had a look through the uses and I always see the current version. Perhaps it's your browser cache? Try the relevant one of these? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tall Ships Challenger 1 - Oona.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tall Ships Challenger 2 - William PG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 08:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C-BASS South at Klerefontein 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 08:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C-BASS South at Klerefontein 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 08:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C-BASS South at Klerefontein 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Playa de las Américas 2020 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:13, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Playa de las Américas 2020 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:12, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Barbara 2012 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2022 064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2022 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2020 1094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:39, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2022 060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:42, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Template:MonumentID

The problem is with the autocategorization of this template that makes some main categories to have hundreds of files already subcategorized to remain unnecesseraly in the main category. The problem is with the template, not with the users that should have to resort to wotkarounds. Tm (talk) 12:46, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

@Tm: Just set the autocat parameter on those images. The problem with setting autocat off by default is that there are many files currently using it (and future files will use it too due to the upload process). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 12:48, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

No, i will not use an autocat parameter that causes more problems, as there is several categories that have hundreds of files that remain in the main category (or several dozens in the wrong categories). But it is easy, i will remove this template from the files that have this problem, so problem solved for good if you do not want to solve them. Tm (talk) 12:51, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

@Tm: That would break the WLM Brazil process quite badly, please don't do that. You have a simple work-around already, please just use that. Also pinging @Ederporto: for awareness. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 12:52, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

I´am not talking of WLM Brazil, as i´am not a brazilian.

File:Palácio de Monserrate por Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (28).jpg wrong category, impossible to remove.

File:Palácio Nacional da Pena por Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (41).jpg, already in subvategory, impossible to remove.

And no, i will not waste my time adding parameters to stop this bad autocat. If you do not want to add a proper way to remove this files that are already categorized, then do not complain when others do it by other means. Tm (talk) 12:57, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

And the two images are just an example of hundreds, if not thousands or tens of thousands, of similar images. Tm (talk) 12:57, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

What's so difficult about just making this edit? Mike Peel (talk) 12:59, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

What's so difficult about to just remove the autocat from already categorized files? Tm (talk) 13:13, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

It's not difficult, I just showed you how to do it? Mike Peel (talk) 13:16, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

How much difficult it is for you to add code to remove the overcategorization provoked by this template that always adds the main category, irrespective of if it is already categorized or not? Do you suposse that is the responsability of other users to clean what bad code implementation provokes? Tm (talk) 13:39, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

I don't know how to do that in the template code, since I don't think the code can see the other categories. A bot task would work, but would take time to write. Mike Peel (talk) 13:46, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Traction engine (TB 2710).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:37, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Traction engine (E 9624) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:37, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Albion Chieftain (RBK 634J) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:20, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ford Thames 4D (807 UXU).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:20, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antoni van Leeuwenhoek letters to the Royal Society 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 13:54, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palm-Mar 2020 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 05:54, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Málaga 2022 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:46, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Málaga 2022 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The lower part is ok for QI, but the statue of the man lacks detail. Fixable? --Tagooty 06:06, 30 January 2023 (UTC) @Tagooty: Thanks for the review! I've tweaked the image, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:02, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:12, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:12, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Traction engine (E 9624).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:24, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Categories and P180

Thank you for pinging me, I provided some info and I am happy to provide more if there will be more questions. PMG (talk) 17:21, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mexico City 2015 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:04, 4 February 2023 (UTC) Beautiful, without shadows --Michielverbeek 19:05, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mexico City 2015 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:41, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mexico City 2015 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:41, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Francisco Church, Mexico City 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:18, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mexico City 2015 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:18, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:29, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcazaba de Almería 2022 079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:37, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Wikidata Infobox in templates

Hey Mike Peel. I'm curious about the reasons behind why a wikidata infobox shouldn't be in a template? Wouldn't it be better to define it in a single place rather than on dozens of category pages using the template? Cryptic-waveform (talk) 22:32, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

@Cryptic-waveform: It's mostly for efficiency. The code that Pi bot runs to add the infoboxes to the categories doesn't know about uses via another template, which leads to multiple infoboxes being displayed. I can add the uses individually through exceptions, but that takes up a lot of my time - more than just letting the bot auto-add them. Computationally, I think the inclusion of them in the templates makes little difference compared to the overheads (both with my time, or if I coded up the bot to do the check on the daily runs). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:37, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. You also answered my follow-up question which was whether you'd be adding the infobox on the category pages :) Cryptic-waveform (talk) 22:44, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

@Cryptic-waveform: If you spot any affected categories that are linked to Wikidata items and don't get the infobox added by Pi Bot tomorrow, please let me know! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:45, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:22, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Teide Observatory 2022 065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:22, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Foden Gardner (PTB 641).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:18, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:58, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:58, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Málaga 2022 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Sudbury Hall 2023 085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:14, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:29, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Pyramids of Güímar 2023 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:29, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 15:18, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Málaga 2022 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs PC --Poco a poco 11:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Thanks for the review, perspective corrected. Thanks. Mike Peel 19:38, 5 February 2023 (UTC)  Support Better if you tilt it a bit in cw direction, but ok --Poco a poco 20:38, 6 February 2023 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Tilted accordingly. Thanks. Mike Peel 20:47, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2022 063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 14:20, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 February 2023 (UTC)