User talk:Mike Peel/Archive 18

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

Archive 18

Archive 19

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:At Tenerife 2022 085 - Gallotia galloti (cropped).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:At Tenerife 2022 085 - Gallotia galloti (cropped).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mexico City 2015 067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:17, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catalyst building 2015 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. I'd crop the building a bit more (cut parts of the top and bottom off), but that is a matter of taste. --Plozessor 05:17, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 103 - Monumento a Marechal Deodoro da Fonseca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (but the title could be more precise). --C messier 20:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jameos del Agua 2022 083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems tilted --Plozessor 19:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC) @Plozessor: Thanks for looking, rotated, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 15:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:43, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted horizon and at least one dust spot --C messier 19:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC) @C messier: Thanks for looking. Rotated and dust spot removed, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 16:08, 20 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dust spots in the sky. --C messier 19:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC) Dust spots removed. Thanks. Mike Peel 16:08, 20 January 2024 (UTC) Sorry, I just spotted one more. --C messier 20:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC) @C messier: Did the latest edit catch it? Thanks. Mike Peel 21:21, 20 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:41, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2019 619 - El Puntero.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For this static subject, the DoF is insufficient -- the rim of the hat and the top edge are blurry. The file name and description should be more descriptive. --Tagooty 02:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC) @Tagooty: Thanks for looking, sharpened, renamed, and more description added, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 11:07, 7 January 2024 (UTC) The original image is 11.3 MB, after CA it has come down to 6.8 MB. I wonder if you have saved with <100% quality? This could cause the lower detail. --Tagooty 08:37, 8 January 2024 (UTC) @Tagooty: It was saved with 90% quality, the same as all of my images. I denoise at the same time as I sharpen, which should explain this. Thanks. Mike Peel 22:41, 9 January 2024 (UTC) The blurry edges of the hat are a deal breaker for me. Could try adjusting denoising so it does not affect edges? And save at 100%. --Tagooty 03:23, 11 January 2024 (UTC) I've tweaked it some more as requested, have a look and see what you think? Thanks. --Mike Peel 20:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality, thanks to your persistence! --Tagooty 16:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Peter Lerangis 01.jpg

On COM:QIC I'm not sure what you mean by "denoise" for File:Peter Lerangis 01.jpg. Are you asking me to further blur the background, or are you asking for something else? - Jmabel ! talk 18:25, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

@Jmabel: In Lightroom, I use 'Manual Noise Reduction' - e.g., see [1]. It's basically removing small scale structure in the photo, which is similar but different for blurring. The green hotspots should definitely be removed, too. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:33, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

I don't use Lightroom, but I can see if I can do something like what you are talking about with GIMP. Are you saying you'd want this even in the face, not just in the background? - Jmabel ! talk 20:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

It's normally applied across the image, but it's only really necessary for the background here. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

I've taken a shot at it, tell me what you think. (There may be an issue with purging. I had to look at it in a different browser, even after action=purge. If the green dots are still there, then you are definitely not seeing the new version.) - Jmabel ! talk 21:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

@Jmabel: It's odd, I can see the 2nd version you uploaded, but the 1st and the 3rd look identical (with green dots), even checking in a different browser and purging. Can you double-check please? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Totally weird. I'm out the door right now, but will try again. - Jmabel ! talk 16:56, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

I think there is some sort of caching issue. I just now completely redid the retouch (starting from the original image) absolutely certainly got rid of those green dots, uploaded, and still see them. They are absolutely not there in the image I just uploaded (I could arrange to get it to you by dropbox or something similar, if you like, or upload under a different filename to get around the caching issue). And, yes, I did purge.

I've been noticing a few issues like this lately: in particular, thumbnails on pages where an image is used showing an older version of the image. - Jmabel ! talk 18:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

E.g. at Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list# January 23, 2024, the image I have of one of the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence still shows (at least for me) some white at lower left, which I retouched out in an upload yesterday. - Jmabel ! talk 18:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

@Jmabel: It is weird, I've also come across it a few other times. But I can see the new version now, and have supported it now. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! - Jmabel ! talk 19:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Paulo 2023 078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 11:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Catavento, São Paulo 2019 115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Svetlov Artem 11:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Catavento, São Paulo 2019 263.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Svetlov Artem 11:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Catavento, São Paulo 2019 102 - Jiboia Locomotive builder plate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, filename should be better --Plozessor 08:22, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK quality. --Charlesjsharp 10:37, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Hyde Park 2023 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 08:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fire Fighter ship, Long Island 2018 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsa do Café, Santos 2017 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsa do Café, Santos 2017 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2017 082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Big Duck 2018 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Big Duck 2018 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsa do Café, Santos 2017 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pennisetum Villosum.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pennisetum Villosum.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At USP 2018 039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At USP 2018 046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 00:38, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At USP 2018 049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 00:38, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 18:03, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Catavento, São Paulo 2019 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:41, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:47, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 063 - Felino de Pé.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good picture! As usual, I'd appreciate a more specific filename ;) --Plozessor 05:41, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Would it make sense to crop this tighter around the in-focus area? --Plozessor 19:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC) @Plozessor: Cropped, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Yes, thx! Good now! --Plozessor 18:45, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Catavento, São Paulo 2019 112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jewel Changi, Singapore 2023 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Memorial Aeroespacial Brasileiro 2023 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At USP 2018 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Check tilt/perspective, also I would crop a bit to the left for a more balanced composition. --C messier 20:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC) @C messier: Thanks for looking, perspective redone, and cropped, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:41, 23 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 08:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 090.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMHO, a bit underexposed. --C messier 20:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC) Brightened, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:41, 23 January 2024 (UTC)  Support OK. --C messier 08:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Catavento, São Paulo 2019 117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 17:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 17:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 17:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Memorial Aeroespacial Brasileiro 2023 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 17:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you fix the dust spot in the left? --Draceane 11:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC) @Draceane: Done, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 08:38, 25 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Draceane 08:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catalyst - Journal of Society of Chemical Industry volumes 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMHO you should get the shelfs horizontal. --C messier 18:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC) @C messier: Thanks for looking, perspective redone, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 08:43, 25 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Thi 18:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catalyst - ICI General Chemicals Widnes Research Laboratory blue plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Thi 18:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catalyst - caustic pot 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:05, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Nominations

I'll be holding back on nominations for the next few weeks. I hope I've been able to help you work through your stock of pictures a little. --XRay 💬 06:39, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

@XRay: Many thanks for the nominations! I'll slow down updates to User:Mike Peel/QI then, ping me if you'd like to nominate any more in the future and I can make sure it's updated. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 08:20, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Catavento, São Paulo 2019 116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jewel Changi, Singapore 2023 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 188.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:53, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Memorial Aeroespacial Brasileiro 2023 049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Memorial Aeroespacial Brasileiro 2023 051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Mariposario del Drago 2022 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, maybe you can still rotate it slightly and give it a better filename. --Plozessor 18:00, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Barcelona 2019 116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 08:50, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 189.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 198.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:39, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Mariposario del Drago 2022 049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK quality. --Charlesjsharp 13:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 10:04, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Memorial Aeroespacial Brasileiro 2023 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Orotava 2023 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:57, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:25, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Singapore Botanic Gardens 2023 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 19:46, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 00:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The flower could be lantana. --Tagooty 00:52, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 00:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Memorial Aeroespacial Brasileiro 2023 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 10:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Memorial Aeroespacial Brasileiro 2023 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 10:34, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:11, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 00:24, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 014 - Snowdrops.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 00:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Thi 11:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 080 - Primavera (Praça Paris).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are three dust spots above the head. --C messier 21:14, 30 January 2024 (UTC) @C messier: Thanks for looking, dust spots zapped, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 00:09, 31 January 2024 (UTC)  Support OK (but a more descriptive title is highly advisable). --C messier 20:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Thi 11:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 22:34, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2020 130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Catavento, São Paulo 2019 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:31, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 259.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:57, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 260.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:38, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flight Montevideo to São Paulo 2023 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmill in El Cotillo 2022 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 10:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Look at the bottom right corner an also the bottom crop is poor --Poco a poco 13:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Oops, corner fixed, and bottom crop improved, thanks for pointing them out. How does it look now? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:42, 3 February 2024 (UTC)  Support looks like qi to me now --Poco a poco 06:00, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 253.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:12, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:12, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:04, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 214.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:04, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jewel Changi, Singapore 2023 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 18:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 18:15, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 187.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 18:15, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Tram stop

Hello Usually I am just accepting your reverts thinking that you, as author of photos, are right. But in case of File:Tram in Frankfurt 2014-1.jpg I really think that "photo of tram on tram stop" the tram stop should be relevant. But I left decision to you. PMG (talk) 10:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

@PMG: Ooh, that's an odd one. I thought you were tagging the photo as a zoo! Have self-reverted. I wonder if there's a way to clarify the Wikidata label, or perhaps SDC should be showing the descriptions along with the labels... Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 10:26, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:52, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:04, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jewel Changi, Singapore 2023 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:04, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Bust of Bertie Reed 1.jpg

And also:

• File:Bust of Bertie Reed 2.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 16:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 00:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:31, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2023 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:31, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Memorial Aeroespacial Brasileiro 2023 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:24, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Carlos 2018 117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:04, 5 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --OmegaFallon 03:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At USP 2018 048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --OmegaFallon 14:32, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Fundación César Manrique 2022 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:07, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 00:10, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:56, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:At Dunham Massey 2024 014 - Snowdrops.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:At Dunham Massey 2024 014 - Snowdrops.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi, please, excuse me because I didn't participate to the procedure after your reply. I was in a trip, and I didn't connect before the voting period was over. Even if it's late, I want to express my support to the nomination. I am pleased at least that, even in my absence, your work received the appropriate recognition. Bye. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:33, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 17:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, but both sides are leaning in --Poco a poco 15:59, 9 February 2024 (UTC) New version uploaded with perspective tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 11:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:47, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 177.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 08:42, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 09:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:50, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 178.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 09:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good picture, filename could be more specific ... --Plozessor 05:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 233.jpg

File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 233.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 10:44, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Hyde Park 2023 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:46, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Hyde Park 2023 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:46, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Paulo 2023 067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:38, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 093.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:41, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:52, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jodrell Bank Observatory 2024 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 13:52, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa Fuerte de Adeje 2020 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:15, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jodrell Bank Observatory 2024 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:15, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catalyst building 2015 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 19:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 192.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 19:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bay Shore, New York 2018 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 19:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obelisco de São Paulo 2019 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:14, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Paulo 2023 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:22, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 184.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 19:23, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 185.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 19:23, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Stourhead 2022 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 16:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 095.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The Summary should indicate that it is a view from the rear. Would help to raise the exposure level of the statues to bring out details. --Tagooty 01:00, 14 February 2024 (UTC) Thanks for looking, description added, exposure level tweaked, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:56, 15 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:38, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA at the trees --Nikride 20:03, 15 February 2024 (UTC) CA tweaked, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:08, 15 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nikride 15:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please think about the verticals, right part is not straight --Michielverbeek 05:38, 14 February 2024 (UTC) Perspective redone, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:04, 15 February 2024 (UTC) Yes, a QI for me --Michielverbeek 23:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 181.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:54, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 090.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA at the trees --Nikride 19:48, 16 February 2024 (UTC) CA fixed, does that look better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nikride 20:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 228.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:37, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 232.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 11:03, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 11:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 179.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Paulo 2023 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:24, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too soft --Poco a poco 15:24, 19 February 2024 (UTC) Sharpened, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Borderline, to be honest, but ok --Poco a poco 21:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:24, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Victoria and Albert Museum 2024 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 13:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Victoria and Albert Museum 2024 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:26, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 164.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Thi 10:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 140.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 18:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 232.jpg

File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 232.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 234.jpg

File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 234.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 235.jpg

File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 235.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 229.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 22:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Biddulph Moor 2023 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 18:47, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Paraty 2023 441.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 14:11, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:46, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Victoria and Albert Museum 2024 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:46, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 18:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:16, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA --Nikride 08:10, 23 February 2024 (UTC) CA tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:16, 23 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nikride 17:58, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 12:58, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Biddulph Moor 2023 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:10, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obelisco de São Paulo 2019 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It looks minimally tilted CW. Otherwise good --MB-one 10:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC) Thanks for looking, rotated a bit, is that better or is more needed? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:23, 23 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Better. Thanks --MB-one 19:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

NY 27 Overlooks

I see that you created a Wiki-Infobox for the Category:Hither Hills West Overlook. Ever consider one for the Category:Montauk Point East Overlook? --DanTD (talk) 23:08, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

UPDATE; I just found out that what you call the Category:Oyster Pond Overlook is in fact the Category:Montauk Point East Overlook. If the name was changed, I don't see any evidence of it. ----DanTD (talk) 03:55, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Yes, those two do seem to be the same. I was going off the name in the map on display at the site, see [2]. Have merged. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 09:01, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

QICbot

Hello. Today, QICbot did not issue quality image status to all photos that needed it. Nikride (talk) 11:19, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

@Nikride: Thanks for the heads-up, bug fixed, bot should be caught up now. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 12:18, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colonia del Sacramento 2016 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:40, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beamish Museum 2016 205.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Whitby Railway Station 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 11:49, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Mariposario del Drago 2022 043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:12, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Mariposario del Drago 2022 044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 12:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Scientific name is always shown in italics --Charlesjsharp 13:37, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the port of Las Palmas 2022 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:12, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Thi 16:41, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:12, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 12:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colonia del Sacramento 2016 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 12:18, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 170.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA --Nikride 09:19, 26 February 2024 (UTC) CA tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 11:36, 26 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nikride 14:47, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 09:59, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 09:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heaton Park Tramway 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:01, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heaton Park Tramway 2016 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 19:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morgan Library & Museum, New York 2017 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 17:26, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 238.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 246.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 260.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dunham Massey 2016 058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beamish Museum 2016 206.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heaton Park Tramway 2016 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Francisco Fire Engine E35 2016 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Paraty 2023 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 12:46, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Paraty 2023 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 15:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Paraty 2023 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:54, 29 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 18:54, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 09:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bramall Hall 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:05, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colonia del Sacramento 2016 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:28, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace of Culture and Science, Warsaw 2016 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 01:28, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Whitby Railway Station 2016 008 - 76079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 01:28, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York 2017 28 - Hatschepsut as Maned Sphinx.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:43, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2018 178.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:05, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Arucas 2022 046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 13:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodega El Grifo 2022 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:05, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:29, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Whitby Railway Station 2016 006 - 76079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:37, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lyme Park 2016 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bramall Hall 2016 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 02:29, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:43, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Whitby Railway Station 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Francis Fireboat, San Francisco 2016 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morgan Library & Museum, New York 2017 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:58, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Table Mountain, Cape Town (MP) 2018 187.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:22, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:21, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the Cradle of Aviation Museum 2023 164.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:02, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the Cradle of Aviation Museum 2023 143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:04, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wasiul Bahar 19:09, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the Cradle of Aviation Museum 2023 144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:25, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:25, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 20:34, 7 March 2024 (UTC) Thanks for looking, perspective corrected, how is that? Thanks. Mike Peel 00:53, 8 March 2024 (UTC)  Support QI now --Poco a poco 08:31, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 20:34, 7 March 2024 (UTC) It would have helped if I'd uploaded the new version ... now done, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 00:53, 8 March 2024 (UTC)  Support QI now --Poco a poco 08:31, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2023 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Wikimedia Hackathon Athens (MP) 2023 061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 12:44, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wooden clothes pegs on a table.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs better CAT and description - material, location --Tagooty 01:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC) Picture quality is borderline. But how is the picture related to its name "At Tenerife"? --Plozessor 05:38, 10 March 2024 (UTC) Thanks for the feedback, file renamed and metadata improved, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 21:40, 10 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:56, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Paraty 2023 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Architecture and Urbanism College of University of São Paulo 2016 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:54, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! GEM telescope, Cachoeira Paulista 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Palmetum de Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodega El Grifo 2022 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:40, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 19:56, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 19:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 171.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodega El Grifo 2022 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodega El Grifo 2022 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 09:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The middle of the "Hard Rock" sign in the back, is that blown out on the picture? (In that you should try to fix in raw conversion.) Or is the sign itself bleached out? --Plozessor 05:36, 10 March 2024 (UTC) Thanks for looking and catching that. I've uploaded a new version that recovers as much as I can, but part of it is indeed blown - the result of a very reflective surface in an otherwise dark-ish room unfortunately. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:25, 11 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Thx, ok now! --Plozessor 09:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Table Mountain, Cape Town (MP) 2018 188.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Riad Salih 17:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Arucas 2022 044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Stourhead 2022 081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 191.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Company's Garden, Cape Town 2018 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:23, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Victoria and Albert Museum 2024 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:23, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bramall Hall 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 09:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bramall Hall 2016 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 17:56, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bramall Hall 2016 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good definition and composition --Sailko 15:09, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Stourhead 2022 082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:50, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Arucas 2022 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Трифонов Андрей 12:21, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Arucas 2022 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:23, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 233.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 245.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:34, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 247.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 261.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (afer adding relevant cats) --Poco a poco 19:13, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Arucas 2022 048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Трифонов Андрей 19:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wooden coat hangers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 20:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted, see posts in the back in the middle of the imag --Poco a poco 19:07, 18 March 2024 (UTC) Good spot, new version uploaded, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 231.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 267.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:43, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 095.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:26, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Air dehumidifier with a European plug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted a bit --Poco a poco 19:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC) Rotated, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:30, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Thi 12:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Thi 12:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bramall Hall 2016 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 01:18, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bramall Hall 2016 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:00, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heaton Park Tramway 2016 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heaton Park Tramway 2016 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Thi 09:57, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paróquia São Sebastião, Cachoeira Paulista 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tuxyso 12:13, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estádio do Pacaembu, Sao Paulo 2017 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2019 243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Трифонов Андрей 08:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bramall Hall 2016 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit noisy in the darker areas but still good quality. --MB-one 11:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 291.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 09:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 294.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments cw tilt --Poco a poco 09:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC) Thanks for looking, rotated, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 386.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments slight ccw tilt --Poco a poco 09:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC) Thanks for looking, rotated, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)  Support A bit more correction would have been just perfect, but ok, close enough --Poco a poco 21:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2024 492.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bramall Hall 2016 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 March 2024 (UTC)