User talk:Mike Peel/Archive 15
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | → | Archive 19 |
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chetham's Library 2015 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chetham's Library 2015 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - Isaac Newton’s Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica manuscript 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Regarding QIC Bot
Hello Mr. Mike Peel, I'm Fabian, a photographer by passion. I normally upload my captures in the commons and nominate them for QI. Recently, while going through my uploads to check which ones should I nominate, I found a couple of pictures which were voted for promotion but QIC bot didn't add the QI tag. File:Mallard Ducks in High Park 03.jpg, File:Sunset from Ontario Place 32.jpg, File:Sunset from Ontario Place 25.jpg and File:Sunset from Ontario Place 24.jpg. Would you mind taking a look at this matter? Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 04:08, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- This happens sometimes unfortunately, see the discussion at Commons_talk:Quality_images_candidates#Unexpected_stop_of_QICbot. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:37, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Almería 2022 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 329.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 331.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Santo Hermano Pedro statue, La Laguna 2022 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - Isaac Newton’s Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica manuscript 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - Isaac Newton’s Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica manuscript 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - Isaac Newton’s Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica manuscript 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2018 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2018 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2018 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2018 069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
|
Uses of Wikidata Infobox with no image has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 12:13, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- @JopkeB: The place to ask this would be Template talk:Wikidata Infobox. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 14:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 226.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 230.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 233.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - Charles Blagden collection.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - Journal Books of the Royal Society 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - Journal Books of the Royal Society 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chetham's Library 2015 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At New York City 2023 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Arucas 2022 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2018 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
QICBot omits some pictures?
Hi, I have a picture reviewed more than a week ago. It is still kept in the section June_10,_2023 of QIC page. Could you please check what stops QICBot from moving the picture to promoted? Best regards -- Jakubhal 21:19, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Jakubhal: There was a stray space in an unexpected location, this edit fixed it. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:34, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chetham's Library 2015 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At New York City 2023 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 142.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chetham's Library 2015 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2017 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2017 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2017 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2017 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ponte Pênsil de São Vicente 2017 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Manchester Victoria station, 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - Journal Books of the Royal Society 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - Charles Blagden collection 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lyme Park 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Odin Mine 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Frankfurt Airport Skyline 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Frankfurt Airport Skyline 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Frankfurt Airport Skyline 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Buckler's Hard 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chetham's Library 2015 64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2017 140.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 222.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Frankfurt Airport Skyline 2017 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Memorial to the Heroes of the Engine Room 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Frankfurt Airport Skyline 2017 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - Journal Books of the Royal Society 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - Journal Books of the Royal Society 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chetham's Library 2015 65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chetham's Library 2015 68.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chetham's Library 2015 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Thanks for creating and maintaining the wikidata infobox <3
So9q (talk) 20:32, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- @So9q: Thanks, I hope you enjoy using it, and Template talk:Wikidata Infobox is always open for suggestions. :-) Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:29, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stoney Littleton Long Barrow 2015 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - Council Minutes of the Royal Society 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At San Francisco 2015 058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At New York City 2023 065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At New York City 2023 076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tenerife 2021 0271.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oliver Cromwell statue, Wythenshawe Park, March 2016 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 236.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Hyde Park 2023 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Hyde Park 2023 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Hyde Park 2023 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stoney Littleton Long Barrow 2015 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stanton Drew stone circles 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 223.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Hyde Park 2023 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Need your input on a policy impacting gadgets and UserJS
Dear interface administrator,
This is Samuel from the Security team and I hope my message finds you well.
There is an ongoing discussion on a proposed policy governing the use of external resources in gadgets and UserJS. The proposed Third-party resources policy aims at making the UserJS and Gadgets landscape a bit safer by encouraging best practices around external resources. After an initial non-public conversation with a small number of interface admins and staff, we've launched a much larger, public consultation to get a wider pool of feedback for improving the policy proposal. Based on the ideas received so far, the proposed policy now includes some of the risks related to user scripts and gadgets loading third-party resources, best practices for gadgets and UserJS developers, and exemptions requirements such as code transparency and inspectability.
As an interface administrator, your feedback and suggestions are warmly welcome until July 17, 2023 on the policy talk page.
Have a great day!Samuel (WMF), on behalf of the Foundation's Security team 23:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Hyde Park 2023 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Museo de Artesania Iberoamerica 2023 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! R381, Loxton to Beaufort West, South Africa 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! R381, Loxton to Beaufort West, South Africa 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! R381, Loxton to Beaufort West, South Africa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Hyde Park 2023 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Hyde Park 2023 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! R381, Loxton to Beaufort West, South Africa 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Arcade, London 2023 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Hyde Park 2023 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Hyde Park 2023 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
"we're not there yet"
Hi,
To follow the discussion started on the DR, I agree with you that "technically/tool-wise" we're almost there (and I also agree we should do a diagnostic to know precisely what still needs to be done, sadly I don't have much time right now), but "editorialy/community-wise" I fear there is still a long way (it's laways the longuest part...).
Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 08:42, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- @VIGNERON: Thanks for the re to Commons:Deletion requests/Creator:D. Benjamin Miller. I agree that community-wise is always the longest part with these sort of tech changes. :-) I also don't have much time right now, but it might be good to find someone who could do that diagnostic/start a community discussion about this (maybe @Jarekt and Multichill: might have thoughts? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- Some years ago, I was working on migrating most of the data from Creator templates to Wikidata with help of Category:Creator template maintenance categories and I managed to move most of it. Most of the Creator templates now have 100% of data coming from Wikidata with the only purpose of the template itself being easy to remember and humanly readable wikicode. However there are still templates that have data on Commons which is missing on Wikidata, or have conflicting information between the two, and those need to be clean up or reconciled. Ideal state is when all the data is on Wikidata and the template renders properly on Commons. Unfortunately, some templates do not render properly and need local "overwrites", like for example nationality of various creators. Many people are described by sources or in the first sentence of their article as "Polish writer", "Italian painter", etc. but the nationality is currently not stored in Wikidata and sometimes can not be algorithmically determined based on country of citizenship (P27) or ethnic group (P172). Sometimes, person have 50 occupations or aliases on Wikidata while Commons can only display 4 or 5. That is why in small percentage of cases we do need local templates in Creator namespace. --Jarekt (talk) 02:47, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At New York City 2023 074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At New York City 2023 075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Arcade, London 2023 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Congleton railway station 2023 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Congleton railway station 2023 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Congleton railway station 2023 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Congleton railway station 2023 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Congleton railway station 2023 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Karoo National Park 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! R381, Loxton to Beaufort West, South Africa 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Memorial to the Heroes of the Engine Room.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At San Francisco 2015 040 - Pier 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oliver Cromwell statue, Wythenshawe Park, March 2016 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oliver Cromwell statue, Wythenshawe Park, March 2016 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Wollaton Hall 2023 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Wollaton Hall 2023 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Wollaton Hall 2023 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Wollaton Hall 2023 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Wollaton Hall 2023 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Issue regarding QI bot
Hello Mike, Recently,while noticing me about my QI promotions, the bot is writing only " Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted --QICbot (int:Talkpagelinktext) 05:27, 19 July 2023 (UTC) " rather than showing me the pictures that were promoted. I thought it was just a temporary issue, but it has happened 5 times already. Would you mind taking a look at my talkpage? Regards, Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 06:52, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Fabian Roudra Baroi: Your talk page is huge! MediaWiki's running out of resources to display it, which is why it's not expanding the templates. You should look into talk page archiving, see User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo, and/or the archive code at the top of this page as an example. Once older content is archived, the newer content should display right. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 09:40, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Ecclesbourne Valley Railway 2023 067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
…back
Hey 2600:387:6:80D:0:0:0:2D 01:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Monumento ai Caduti, Lecco, Wikimania 2016, MP 003.jpg
- File:Monumento ai Caduti, Lecco, Wikimania 2016, MP 005.jpg
- File:Monumento ai Caduti, Lecco, Wikimania 2016, MP 006.jpg
- File:Monumento ai Caduti, Lecco, Wikimania 2016, MP 007.jpg
- File:Monumento ai Caduti, Lecco, Wikimania 2016, MP 008.jpg
- File:Monumento ai Caduti, Lecco, Wikimania 2016, MP 009.jpg
- File:Monumento ai Caduti, Lecco, Wikimania 2016, MP 010.jpg
- File:Monumento ai Caduti, Lecco, Wikimania 2016, MP 011.jpg
- File:Monumento ai Caduti, Lecco, Wikimania 2016, MP 012.jpg
- File:Monumento ai Caduti, Lecco, Wikimania 2016, MP 013.jpg
- File:Monumento ai Caduti, Lecco, Wikimania 2016, MP 017.jpg
- File:Monumento ai Caduti, Lecco, Wikimania 2016, MP 019.jpg
- File:Monumento ai Caduti, Lecco, Wikimania 2016, MP 022.jpg
- File:Monumento ai Caduti, Lecco, Wikimania 2016, MP 023.jpg
- File:Monumento ai Caduti, Lecco, Wikimania 2016, MP 024.jpg
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Copy of a page
Oi, Mike, tudo bem? I’m writing you this message in order to ask you if it’s possible you send me a copy (through email, for example) of a deleted page of mine on English Wikipedia. Getting straight to the point, it’s a copy of this page right before it was deleted by Bbb23. It was deleted as supposedly being a “negative unsourced BLP”. The fact is that everything I wrote can be checked on reliable sources [1] [2] [3] [4] (see also Wikidata:Q118985836), but I usually prefer to write my articles first and just then add references to them. If it helps, one of the sources I have just mentioned is an academic paper by DarwIn. Melhores cumprimentos, RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:23, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oi @RodRabelo7: , tudo bem e você? I've read through the deleted draft (em português), and I have to agree with @Bbb23: . As you wrote it, it is clearly an attack article that is not based on reliable sources. I can't see how you could turn it into an article that could be included on enwiki. So I have to decline your request. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Palmetum de Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2023 072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 240.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 244.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - Council Minutes of the Royal Society 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - Council Minutes of the Royal Society 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - Council Minutes of the Royal Society 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - Council Minutes of the Royal Society 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - Council Minutes of the Royal Society 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
_2023_143.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Wikimedia Hackathon Athens (MP) 2023 143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Biddulph Grange 2023 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 140.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - John Evelyn’s Sylva 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At New York City 2023 072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Ecclesbourne Valley Railway 2023 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Ecclesbourne Valley Railway 2023 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Ecclesbourne Valley Railway 2023 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - John Evelyn’s Sylva 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - John Evelyn’s Sylva 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Ecclesbourne Valley Railway 2023 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Ecclesbourne Valley Railway 2023 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Ecclesbourne Valley Railway 2023 098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Ecclesbourne Valley Railway 2023 066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Museo de Artesania Iberoamerica 2023 048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Manchester 2023 2023 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Biddulph Moor 2023 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Biddulph Moor 2023 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 237.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Congleton railway station 2023 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Museo de Artesania Iberoamerica 2023 050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_2023_146.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Wikimedia Hackathon Athens (MP) 2023 146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 81.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Mike Peel, here are some of the results with the SB-910 and a DIY lightbox.
If you have any improvements please tell me. 多多123 21:17, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- @多多123: White balance is definitely better, but you're still not getting much depth of field. Which lens are you using? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:19, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- I used f/16, I'm pretty sure... It's the Micro Nikkor 55mm f/3.5. The focus is falling off to the right in the first image and in the middle one it's to the left. 多多123 21:21, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- @多多123: That looks like a good lens. Try backing off to f/9 and see how that looks? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:26, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel: I'll do that now, thanks for the suggestion. I've got to get the flash right or it overexposes. 多多123 21:28, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel: Slight problem with that... I forgot that this is a manual lens and I can only choose from 32 22 16 11 8 5.6 and 3.5 多多123 21:31, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- @多多123: Try 8. If you have access to another lens, it would also be good to try that with similar settings in case this one has optics issues. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:37, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel: I tried 32 and 8... Similar results, the focus falls off at the ends. I don't have any other lens except for a kit lens and a telephoto zoom lens, but these zoom and focus differently so I will get an entirely different result. I personally dislike the kit lens and the zoom lens has fungus so it just tints everything to grey. 多多123 21:46, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Here's another image I took today, the f/stop doesn't seem to change the DoF a lot, I tried it in some shots comparing it to this one.
- Here's another image I took today, the f/stop doesn't seem to change the DoF a lot, I tried it in some shots comparing it to this one.
- @Mike Peel: I tried 32 and 8... Similar results, the focus falls off at the ends. I don't have any other lens except for a kit lens and a telephoto zoom lens, but these zoom and focus differently so I will get an entirely different result. I personally dislike the kit lens and the zoom lens has fungus so it just tints everything to grey. 多多123 21:46, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- @多多123: Try 8. If you have access to another lens, it would also be good to try that with similar settings in case this one has optics issues. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:37, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- @多多123: That looks like a good lens. Try backing off to f/9 and see how that looks? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:26, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- I used f/16, I'm pretty sure... It's the Micro Nikkor 55mm f/3.5. The focus is falling off to the right in the first image and in the middle one it's to the left. 多多123 21:21, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
多多123 21:49, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- @多多123: Yup, that doesn't sound right, maybe it's not actually changing the f/stop somehow and it's stuck at the widest setting? Does the exposure time change with f/stop? Definitely try with the kit lens and similar settings, and see what happens. It might also be worth starting a discussion at Commons:Photography critiques, since others here know way more than I about photography! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:36, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel: The aperture is definitely changing when off the camera. I don't think the exposure time should change, as it doesn't show any changes on the Info. 多多123 17:44, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- The kit lens gets more DoF but it has different framing. 多多123 17:45, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- @多多123: Exposure time should increase when you have a higher f/stop - if it's not doing that, there's a problem. I'd use the stock lens if that's giving you a higher DoF. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:02, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel: Oh, so I confused exposure time with shutter speed. I'll get a different lens for next year, but for now it should be fine as I have gotten some sharp photos. 多多123 21:44, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- @多多123: Exposure time should increase when you have a higher f/stop - if it's not doing that, there's a problem. I'd use the stock lens if that's giving you a higher DoF. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:02, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- The kit lens gets more DoF but it has different framing. 多多123 17:45, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel: The aperture is definitely changing when off the camera. I don't think the exposure time should change, as it doesn't show any changes on the Info. 多多123 17:44, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At São Paulo 2018 294.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At São Paulo 2018 297.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At São Paulo 2018 295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 87.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Ecclesbourne Valley Railway 2023 065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 76.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Congleton railway station 2023 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Why
…this? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:41, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- That’s the category matching the Wikidata item used in Template:MonumentID, see talk page for why the edits in general are being made. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 01:53, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Biddulph Moor 2023 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - John Evelyn’s Sylva 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Biddulph Grange 2023 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At London 2023 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At London 2023 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At São Paulo 2018 296.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 86.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Museo de Artesania Iberoamerica 2023 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 241.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Wollaton Hall 2023 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_2023_142.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Wikimedia Hackathon Athens (MP) 2023 142.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
"Warning:Default sort key..." at Category:Wendy Sherman
Category:Wendy Sherman- This category currently has a wrong middle name (Perra) for her, instead of the correct "Ruth." Can you fix this?
There is this warning in red color: "Warning: Default sort key "Sherman, Perra" overrides earlier default sort key "Sherman, Wendy"."
Also, an earlier Pi Bot edit had the same message here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category%3AWendy_Sherman&diff=301603321&oldid=259035631
Thank you, -- Ooligan (talk) 16:49, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Ooligan: There was vandalism on Wikidata, now fixed. Pi bot removes auto sort keys where they conflict with local ones, so you can normally ignore the red warning message (unless it's there for several days). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 00:01, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel. I did not know about Pi bot's duties and I know little of the wikidata universe. I just wanted to get it fixed and not ignore this issue. This is how I learn. BTW, you have always been kind and attentive to my occasional interactions. Thanks for your many contributions. -- Ooligan (talk) 03:04, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Museo de Artesania Iberoamerica 2023 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tenerife 2021 0274.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tenerife 2021 0275.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - John Evelyn’s Sylva 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - John Evelyn’s Sylva 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Ecclesbourne Valley Railway 2023 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 75.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 79.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Ecclesbourne Valley Railway 2023 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2020 118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Singapore Botanic Gardens 2023 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Ecclesbourne Valley Railway 2023 090.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tyntesfield 2015 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tyntesfield 2015 115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tyntesfield 2015 124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Singapore Botanic Gardens 2023 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Singapore Botanic Gardens 2023 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Singapore Botanic Gardens 2023 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 93.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Palmetum de Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2022 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Palmetum de Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2022 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Chester Zoo 2023 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Biddulph Grange 2023 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Biddulph Grange 2023 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Biddulph Grange 2023 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RHS Garden Bridgewater 2022 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At La Orotava 2023 118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At La Orotava 2023 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Biddulph Grange 2023 052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Biddulph Grange 2023 056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Biddulph Grange 2023 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Biddulph Grange 2023 039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 353.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:The Greenland Telescope in 2017 November.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Solomon203 (talk) 06:49, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At El Cotillo 2022 057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
On file names
Re the discussion on QIC. Images in a CAT are displayed in alphabetical order. A name such as "At <town> nnn" for a bunch of photos of say statues and paths in a park results in all these images bunched together in the CAT for the park. I prefer "Statue Park Town nnn", "Statue Closeup Park Town nnn", "Entrance Park Town nnn", etc. So, for someone scanning the CAT, my images will be scattered around hopefully in a somewhat logical fashion. I suffix the complete camera file name so I can easily locate the original file on my hard disk.
For QI, COM:QIC states "Quality images shall have a meaningful file name". I don't usually decline a nom based on file name, but I do often suggest renaming. Tagooty (talk) 03:11, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Tagooty: That makes sense, but would also take up a lot of time. I'm currently trying to work through my photo backlog, so that 1) files are uploaded (I'm trying to get most of the photos I take on Commons, where possible/useful), 2) files are in the appropriate category (I have way too many currently sat in, for example, Category:Tenerife...), 3) QI where possible (since I've finding that a useful place to get feedback on whether images have worked or not and improve my photography). Renaming files seems to be something done individually rather than in bulk, and would take up quite a bit of time away from (1) and (2) - but would be the ideal situation I guess. Will think about it. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 06:40, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for explaining your priorities. Indeed, there is a difficult balance between very well classified images and sharing more images. I spend time classifying and labelling my images with the optimistic hope that there are millions of people on the Internet dying to use my images and writings. I've actually come across very few such people, but one keeps hoping!
- A useful tool to track usage of images is glamorous.php. If you enter a user name, and click "Doit it!" it shows you all uses of that user's images in all Wiki projects. Scroll down to the bottom of the table, to see the percentage of uploaded images that have been used. Tagooty (talk) 01:58, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Tagooty: I typically get a request every few weeks to use one of my photos outside of the projects - not as much as I was expecting, but then most people use them without asking. I have found that using a template like User:Mike Peel/Credit on the file pages helps with this, since people often quote the text from that when contacting me. (I should update [5] properly at some point...) Glamorous is great! I also like Baglama for tracking page views (currently 11 million views/month for my photos!). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:22, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Baglama is new to me, very useful. 11m views/month is amazing. I think this is views of pages containing the photos from the Category. Baglama does not appear to report views of a photo. I may be missing something. Tagooty (talk) 03:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- That's right. There is probably a tool that does report views of a photo, but I don't know where. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:33, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- This page has some useful analysis tools:
- Try this to list all files in a CAT
I found these in the "Page information" tab in the left side menu. Tagooty (talk) 03:24, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- That's right. There is probably a tool that does report views of a photo, but I don't know where. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:33, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Baglama is new to me, very useful. 11m views/month is amazing. I think this is views of pages containing the photos from the Category. Baglama does not appear to report views of a photo. I may be missing something. Tagooty (talk) 03:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Tagooty: I typically get a request every few weeks to use one of my photos outside of the projects - not as much as I was expecting, but then most people use them without asking. I have found that using a template like User:Mike Peel/Credit on the file pages helps with this, since people often quote the text from that when contacting me. (I should update [5] properly at some point...) Glamorous is great! I also like Baglama for tracking page views (currently 11 million views/month for my photos!). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:22, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for explaining your priorities. Indeed, there is a difficult balance between very well classified images and sharing more images. I spend time classifying and labelling my images with the optimistic hope that there are millions of people on the Internet dying to use my images and writings. I've actually come across very few such people, but one keeps hoping!