Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Carcassonne Cite.jpg

File:Carcassonne Cite.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2010 at 05:24:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Carcassonne Cite.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Carcassonne Cite.jpg

•  Info created by Benh - uploaded by Benh - nominated by -- Brackenheim (talk) 05:24, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Brackenheim (talk) 05:24, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - High quality, geo-tagged, excellent lighting for the time of night, and has the "wow" factor. Tiptoety ^talk 06:22, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect! - Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 07:25, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:59, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Excellent! MartinD (talk) 14:39, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 15:20, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Υπέρ --патриот8790^{Say whatever you want} 15:26, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - sorry, but I'd much rather see it in full daylight - MPF (talk) 17:16, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
  • I thought we were reviewing a photo by night? :) Diti the penguin — 00:16, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent night shot. Very nice composition and lighting. Great job! -- MJJR (talk) 18:55, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I disagree with MPF. I find it much more interesting at night. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:07, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noticeable stitched sky at thumbnail size… the most used size when using this photo on the web. Diti the penguin — 00:16, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

• You're right. Saw it too when this pic was nominated. This is because of decreasing light while taking the successive photos (dusk panorama photos are hard to get right). There are workaround/photoshopping possible, so same, will try a restitch if have time.... - Benh (talk) 08:01, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

• Well, I hope this will work… because this photo deserves to be a FP. ^^ Diti the penguin — 08:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Diti. --99of9 (talk) 13:55, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose per MPF and Diti. Lycaon (talk) 05:58, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose for now, per Diti. could you please upload individual photos, so we could try and restitch it.   ■ MMXX  ^talk  09:47, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

• I don't provide raw source of my panoramas, as they are the only mean for me to prove I'm author. If I realise I won't find time to reprocess it, I'll be happy to do so to a user I trust. - Benh (talk) 06:43, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

•  Support --Karel (talk) 19:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:33, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 20:38, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Stitching errors, too much contrast for my taste. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:00, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose The colour/exposure shifts in the sky are much to apparent.There is an unbalanced contrast/saturation ratio between the castle and the development in the foreground. Surely it's to be due to the unfortunate lighting but it appears very strange. Sorry   • Richard • [®] • 00:45, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

• I understand. Strange that I never saw that before (I once nominated the picture myself). Most of the reviews were very usefull, and will help when I reprocess it from scratch. Thanks. - Benh (talk) 06:43, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

•  Support --MZaplotnik ^{(my contribs)} 18:07, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Υπέρ -- Takabeg (talk) 09:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose if this can be withdrawn, I'd prefer. Time for me to fix. Wouldn't like a pic with this many issues being promoted. - Benh (talk) 07:27, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:57, 12 July 2010 (UTC)