User talk:JuTa

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Speedy delete[edit]

Per [1], I thought pages like that could be deleted according to Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion#Commons and Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion#General reasons (#1)? DrKiernan (talk) 09:07, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Yep, it could be deleted. But I find it easier to decline the DR and let it be archived by bots. Otherwise it has to be delincted manualy on the daily deletion log page. regards. --JuTa 19:38, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Regarding File:Logo Impact Campus.png[edit]

It is the student newpaper logo. I curently work there and to have permission to post it on wikimedia/pedia. What would be the correct copyright status to place the file into ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.212.252.121 (talk • contribs) 2014-09-06T23:28:45‎ (UTC)

Hi, I now had a deeper look into it. That's IMHO simple enough for {{PD-textlogo}}. I'll correct the file description page. But be aware: everybody in the world has to be allowed to use any image on commons for any purpose incluing commercial ones. regards --JuTa 09:04, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Eigenes Archiv[edit]

Hello JuTa,

I have seen that you marked the license for File:Dagonsilo.jpg as obvious or is not required. I cant read German and google translate is not much helpful. I ave seen the archiv mention her but could not understand. Can you please tell me why files from Eigenes Archiv are o.k. Sorry for my ignorance. Geagea (talk) 22:36, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi, as there is the original uploader statet as the author and google can only find wikipedia an clones, I assume thats own work. But if you realy think thats nor sufficiant enough you may start a regular deletion request. regards. --JuTa 07:19, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
I understand now "Eigenes Archiv"="own archiv" from German. Thanks for clarifying it. Geagea (talk) 07:41, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Donnerbergkaserne Eschweiler Sportplatz.jpg[edit]

Hallo JuTa,

die Markierung der genannten Datei erfolgte aufgrund der Tatsache, dass dieser Sportplatz sich auf dem Gelände der Kaserne befindet, was sich durch http://dejure.org/gesetze/StGB/109g.html in einem "gewissen" Graubereich befindet - zumindestens ohne jegliche Genehmigung.

Gruß --Grunpfnul (talk) 02:58, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Dann hättest Du das azu schreiben, oder besser gleich einen regulären Löschantrag stellen sollen. Gruß --JuTa 07:23, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Wenn keine Genehmigung vorhanden ist, reicht doch ein entsprechender Vermerk? Vielleicht hat der Nutzer eine Genehmigung? --Grunpfnul (talk) 15:32, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Am Rande bemerkt: Permission for this file is obvious or is not required. <- Du hast die Feststellung getroffen, die aber nicht im Sinne des Gesetzes ist. --Grunpfnul (talk) 15:35, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Re: File:LocomotivaFS737.jpg[edit]

Dear JuTa, thank you for communication.

The file is licensed PD-Italy: [2].

Unfortunately I was unable to enter the correct license: would you help me?

Thanks. Yours sincerely, --Alessandro Crisafulli (talk) 07:12, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

.Hi, another user fixed that inbetween. regards --JuTa 07:25, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

WoW Corrupted Blood Plague image[edit]

Hi JuTa,

I just uploaded File:WoW Corrupted Blood Plague.jpg for inclusion in the spanish wikipedia article on the subject (https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incidente_de_la_Sangre_Corrupta), much like it is in the english wikipedia article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corrupted_Blood_incident). I didn't realize such a fair-use image was inappropriate por Wikimedia Commons, which now makes it clear to me why it was hosted locally at the english wikipedia site, instead of here.

Now realizing this, I will remove this image from Wikimedia Commons immediately, and would like to sincerely apologize for the mistake.

DJulivert (talk) 09:02, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry to say I haven't been able to find how/where to delete it. The copyright statement for fair-use generated an automatic speedy deletion template. Is this enough for the image to be removed, or should I do something else? Sorry for bothering you, and thanks for your patience. DJulivert (talk) 09:05, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi, the template you or somebory else added {{Non-free use rationale}} leeds to a speedy deletion request. Another admin allready deleted it inbetween. regards. --JuTa 18:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Removal of locomotives of Britain[edit]

(JuTa moved page Category:Industrial steam locomotives of Britain to Category:Industrial steam locomotives of the United Kingdom: per Commons:Categories for discussion/2011/03/Category:Industrial locomotives of Britain)

...and many other categories. See Category talk:Industrial electric locomotives of the United Kingdom too.

That was a crap move. It used a three year old CfD as justification, a CfD that showed no sign of consensus whatsoever. It now manages to overlap Ireland and the UK (a political minefield) and it combines the NI broad gauge stock with British mainland standard gauge stock (a technical error). In no way did this make categorization better.

How about a couple of English editors come and re-name the principalities of Germany from a sense of sheer ignorance? Maybe mix up Brandenburg and Magdeburg a bit, because they sound much the same? It should be a key principle at WP that if you aren't familiar with a subject, then don't mess with it. This doesn't seem to stop either you or Sju (author of the "train driving cockpit" rubbish a while back). Andy Dingley (talk) 09:53, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I'm just trying work work on the very long on old backlog of Category:Categories for discussion by month, where no other admin was working on for over 3 years now. And in Commons:Categories for discussion/2011/03/Category:Industrial locomotives of Britain i saw you as the only one opposing the move. I could follow the argunements pro move. You ight like to recreate the ... of Britain categories as subcatgies of the ... of the United Kingdom ones an sort suitibale images a cats across. regards --JuTa 14:19, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
So if a CfD has been opposed, ground to a halt and is now sitting there moribund, you think that it's a good idea to come along and action it anyway, without further discussion, just to "clear a backlog"? That is a ridiculous prioritisation of admin process over quality, sadly a frequent occurrence in your editing 8-( Andy Dingley (talk) 12:34, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Yes, I think so. --JuTa 12:36, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
That much has been obvious for a long time. Have you even read WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY ? Andy Dingley (talk) 13:37, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Photo ownership for Pin of Officer of Palmes académiques[edit]

Hi! Very sorry I hastily put on the web without asking permission of the snapshots' author. I requested today the grant of the author and will post again soon. BR, PhL

Hi, the copyright holder has to send an email to the commons support team releasing the images under a free license like documented in Commons:OTRS. The license {{cc-by-sa-4.0}} is recommanded. regards. --JuTa 12:02, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello!

I received in reply to my request today the following (my mail quoted underneath):

eBay eBay a envoyé ce message à Philippe LEBOURG (ph.cl.l).
Le nom associé à votre compte est inclus pour indiquer que ce message provient bien d'eBay. En savoir plus
Le vendeur a répondu à votre question concernant cet objet
Bonjour ph.cl.l,
Bonjour,
Oui pas de soucis, j'accepte !
Cordialement.
- ledamoiseau
--------------------------------------------------------------------
De : ph.cl.l
A : ledamoiseau
Objet : Autre : ph.cl.l a envoyé un message concernant l'objet Rosette pin's médaille :d'officier des palmes académiques, diamètre: 6 mm n° 371098515579
Date de l'envoi : 14-sept.-14 09:28:35 Paris
Bonjour ledamoiseau,
Bonjour!
Dans un souci de partage et d'exhaustivité des informations sur wikipedia, j'ai souhaité ajouter une photo d'épinglette pour la rosette violette des palmes académiques à l'article Palmes académiques du site. J'aurais besoin de votre autorisation pour pouvoir fournir cet ajout de photos au site Commons Media qui gère ces documents car, un peu ignorant et expéditif, j'ai hâtivement transmis le fichier sans vous informer (désolé). Commons media (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS/fr) demande une action pour rectifier. :Aussi vous demandé-je humblement: êtes-vous prêt à accorder les droits sur image des photos de cet article pour une telle utilisation en vue du bien public sur un site d'information général?
Merci d'avance.
- ph.cl.l

I am not sure that the owner is wanting to spend time in filling a form and sending new messages, but I'm asking this very night... BR, PhL

Hi, he has to name or agree to a specific license. Otherwise the OTRS stuff will not accept it. And the mail should be send to permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org. regards. --JuTa 21:24, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Deleted Files[edit]

Hello! Why was this file deleted? The author agreed an, has sent the permission and got a confirmation. I just wanted to repeat the procedure, but the uploader refused to get the same picture. There are even three further pictures with art of Margarete Wiggen, that were also deleted. -PeterBraun74 (talk) 11:47, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi PeterBraun74, for images with template {{OTRS pending}} there is normaly a period of 30 days to be handeled through OTRS. If nothing happens during this period the template automaticly adds a {{no permission since}}, and about a week later the images get deleted. I don't know what the problem was in this case, but no OTRS volounteer picked up that case. There have might been ambiguities or the OTRS stuff might have been to busy with other cases (I'm not an OTRS member). You should ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for this image/ticket. If the release is valid the image will be undeleted withouts problems. regards. --JuTa 20:50, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

私があげた市町村と旗のファイルの削除の件[edit]

  • mtiです。おはようございます。さて、私があげた市町村と旗のファイルの削除の件ですが、著作権の違反がありましたので、削除してください。--Mti (talk) 22:27, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi, the deletion request(s) will normaly run for a week. I just cleaned up "your mess". All your requests were incomplete because the were not listed on the todays request log page. I decided to merge them together to one request to keep discussion together. For the future: Please try to realy create complete deletion requests. thanks. --JuTa 22:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

file PalestinaPuerto.jpg[edit]

Hi! Im looking into what happened with the file:PalestinaPuerto.jpg.If you do not know, this photo and the article on Palestina, Peru, were created as part of a project that became a documentary called "The Web" (teaser here [3]) I am in Mexico City and, inspired by the film, we are starting a project to do something similar with primary schools in the city. However, its hard to use the article as an example as there is no photo for it and the documentary clearly showed photos being taken and uploaded. I can contact the director of the film, but we need to know what needs to be done to restore the image. Thank you! Thelmadatter (talk) 14:16, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi Thelmadatter, the image was deleted last year because of the lack of any license given on the file description page. It was uploaded by an declared as own work of User:Michael.Kleiman, who is not active anymore since 2010 when he uploaded that image. If you contact the director of that film to ask for (another?) free image: He should send an email to the commons support team which clealy states that he is the author and/or copyright of the image(s) and clearly chooses a free license. {{cc-by-sa-4.0}} is recommanded. The procedure is documented on Commons:OTRS. There you find example texts for such an email as well. regards. --JuTa 20:58, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick response. I have emailed Mr. Kleiman and hopefully we can get some images back up on the page. Ive been using it and the clip from the documentary to help develop a similar project here in Mexico City.Thelmadatter (talk) 22:13, 17 September 2014 (UTC)