User talk:MJJR/archive 2013 (part 2)

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search



MJJR - User talk: ARCHIVE 2013 (part 2)


Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Varsenare Nieuwege R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok for me --Christian Ferrer 07:41, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 1876 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK  Support --Rjcastillo 15:38, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU268 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK  Support --Rjcastillo 22:11, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 1924 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:17, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Dear MJJR,

the chair 'Entwerfen und Baugestaltung' at the Technical University in Darmstadt (Germany) of Prof. Johann Eisele would like to use for a publication with a publisher (2.000 copies and optional another 2.000 copies) your image of the scheepsdalebrug (File:Brugge Scheepsdalebrug R01.jpg). The imagesize is approximatley around 10 x 10 centimetres. In the image index we would publish you by the following indication: MJJR, Wikimedia Commons, lizenziert unter Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported, URL: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brugge_Scheepsdalebrug_R01.jpg

Therefor I would like to get your permission. Please contact me via email: btrautmann@eub.tu-darmstadt.de

Thank you

Best regards

Benjamin Trautmann

File:Brugge Scheepsdalebrug R01.jpg

Dear MJJR,

the chair 'Entwerfen und Baugestaltung' at the Technical University in Darmstadt (Germany) of Prof. Johann Eisele would like to use for a publication with a publisher (2.000 copies and optional another 2.000 copies) your image of the scheepsdalebrug (File:Brugge Scheepsdalebrug R01.jpg). The imagesize is approximatley around 10 x 10 centimetres. In the image index we would publish you by the following indication: MJJR, Wikimedia Commons, lizenziert unter Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported, URL: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brugge_Scheepsdalebrug_R01.jpg

Therefor I would like to get your permission. Please contact me via email: btrautmann@eub.tu-darmstadt.de

Thank you

Best regards

Benjamin Trautmann

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU210 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 22:26, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU597 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 10:15, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU632 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:37, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vivenkapelle R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Nice shot. --High Contrast 10:05, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blauwe Toren Junction R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 23:26, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 2833 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 00:45, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 2806 R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 00:45, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Averbode Abdijkerk R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 09:53, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Carmersstraat R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support best if sharpened, but QI for me anyway --A.Savin 22:02, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Speelmansstraat R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 21:59, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU632 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:25, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Averbode Abdijkerk R06.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Averbode Abdijkerk R06.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 2842 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Knesselarebrug R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 21:14, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Knesselarebrug R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 21:12, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 1857 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 22:03, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Retranchement Molen R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:43, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Leeuwstraat R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 00:02, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Bevrijdingslaan R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 11:59, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Smedenstraat R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--ArildV 10:40, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoge Dijken R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 10:03, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Kameiros R11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:55, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Groenerei R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 16:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen Waalbrug R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 20:38, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Kameiros R10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:10, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station Brugge-Sint-Pieters R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Retranchement NHKerk R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A50 bij Woeste Hoeve R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:59, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen Waalbrug R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 21:27, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen Kerkboog R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 18:53, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU604 R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 22:42, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen Stevenskerk R10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good --A.Savin 17:53, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen Markt 22-25 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:29, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deelerwoud R12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --Laitche 05:45, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tillegem Kasteel R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:19, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostkamp Nieuwburghoeve R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:17, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loppem World War I Memorial R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 21:14, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klemskerke Geersensmolen R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 19:38, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wenduine Hubertmolen R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:05, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pier Blankenberge R07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 19:38, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nationaal Park Veluwezoom R08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:44, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tillegem Kasteel R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:19, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostkamp Nieuwburghoeve R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:17, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loppem World War I Memorial R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 21:14, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klemskerke Geersensmolen R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 19:38, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wenduine Hubertmolen R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:05, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pier Blankenberge R07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 19:38, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nationaal Park Veluwezoom R08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:44, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Detmold

Hallo Marc, dein Detmold-Bild ist sehr populär . Gestern war es sogar auf der Hauptseite der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia. Dieser Architekt nutzt es allerdings nicht nur lizenzwidrig, er hat gestern in einer Mail an das Support-Team behauptet, er habe es aufgenommen. Vielleicht möchtest du ihn ja wegen der fehlenden Lizenz abmahnen.

Gruß, Seewolf (talk)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostkamp Rivierbeek R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 14:54, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostkamp Warande R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good --A.Savin 18:12, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anseremme Prieuré R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Halicki 23:29, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anseremme Prieuré R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:23, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anseremme Cimetière R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:50, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anseremme Spoorbrug R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:45, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Givet Rue Oger R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:34, 19 November 2013 (UTC)


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear MJJR,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Givet Saint-Hilaire R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It is tilted Poco a poco 21:25, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
I don't see any tilt, even at 100% size… -- MJJR 22:19, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
I added a note, anyhow, let me reformulate my comment: tilt + perspective issues Poco a poco 19:36, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
The altar is very slightly tilted indeed, while the other verticals are fairly OK. Two possible explanations: or the altar is really somewhat leaning, or my lens - which is not an expensive professional one - has some small distortions which I cannot correct with the software (Photoshop Elements 6) I have. Please feel free to try an improvement… -- MJJR 10:02, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
I have uploaded a new version, and just applied a tilt of 0,7 degrees. IMHO it is ok now but would like a second opinion after I edited it. Poco a poco 08:47, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Good quality. --JLPC 17:57, 24 November 2013 (UTC)



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear MJJR,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Palma Los Cancajos R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Stepro 01:36, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Palma San Antonio R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 01:29, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Palma San Antonio R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:25, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Palma Los Cancajos R07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support a bit soft, but OK --A.Savin 16:12, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

2014 !

* * * 2014! * * *
Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:25, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia in the European Parliament

Since 2009 Wikipedians are visiting German and Austrian State Parliaments to take pictures of their members. They have been made available under a free license on Wikimedia Commons. They can be used in Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects but also outside of Wikipedia - in compliance with the license conditions - for example by the Members of Parliament themselves. Besides the creation of free pictures of politicians, the project offers the deputies the opportunity to ask questions about Wikipedia and to discuss „their“ Wikipedia article (eg. to indicate possible problems with personal rights). For Wikipedians this offers the chance to explain their idea of „Free Knowledge“ and the work of the Wikimedia projects. In addition these contacts give Wikipedia photographers access to places that are not accessible to the public in order to produce free images. We now have the opportunity to visit the European Parliament in Strasbourg in February and perform a photography and editing project for the 764 MEPs there. In particular as the next elections for the European Parliament are upcoming in May, these new articles and photos are under a strong focus of the public. Volunteers should sign up on our Google form - note the section on the Commons project page about selection. I would be happy to have a supporting voice from you for the Grant request on Meta: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants_talk:PEG/Olaf_Kosinsky/Wikipedians_in_European_Parliament --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 19:51, 27 December 2013 (UTC)