User talk:Piraeus
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
--SieBot 14:49, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, images from Flickr user Amir Farshad Ebrahimi are considered unfree, he copies the images from AFP, REUTERS, GETTY and other webistes and mark them cc-by-sa, this is invalid because he is not the author. Please ciritically evaluate Flickr images, often the Flickr uploaders have no sense for copyrights. --Martin H. (talk) 17:41, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, in this case ([1]) im absolutely sure, it is a very easy case you can identify the image by typing the image caption to google and you will find the source. But you are right, in many cases it is hard to identify this, but there are some hints:
- A look on the other contributions of the uploader is always a good idea, variations in style, professional images but missing metadata, various styles, images with metadata but many different cameras are indications for wrong cc-licensing
- For famous persons or subjects the gettyimages website worth a visit
- Google imagesearch can find images with a similar description
- TinEye can find images by comparing images fingerprints
- Of course you cannot do all this stuff every time, taking a look on the other contributions of the Flickruser might be ok. Btw: I saw your question on the images talkpage, except the copyright problem which are not your fault everything was ok with your upload. --Martin H. (talk) 18:39, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
re:Káli templom képe nem a káli templomot ábrázolja
[edit]De, az a káli templom. De valaki már le is cserélte egy jobb képre a káli cikbben. --[[--Rakás (talk) 05:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)]] 05:48, 19 June 2014 (UTC) Ja, bocs, elfelejtkeztem a bejelentkezésről a válasz előtt. Mos megnéztem az újabb képet is. Úgy látszik, változtattak a kupoláján azóta. --Rakás (talk) 05:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)