User talk:Ramiy

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

תהיתי אם תוכל להכין גרסה של תבנית המיזמים עם האייקונים הקטנים וכו' באנגלית על-מנת שאוכל להציע שהיא תחליף את זו שכרגע נמצאת בשימוש באנגלית. אחרת כנראה יחזירו לשימוש את הישנה לשם אחידות בין השפות. Yonatanh 11:26, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

את התבנית עיצבתי על פי התבנית האנגלית, ראה קישור זה. מטרתי הייתה ליישר קו עם המיזם באנגלית. Ramiy 11:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Superseding[edit]

Please, why do you put a {{SupersededSVG}} [1] tag in a SVG file? I think that this version is better than the yellow one (I am the author of both). Look here: http://www.egov.go.kr/symbol/AA130_mark.jsp I removed the tag. Chabacano 19:35, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

in the Category:Coats of arms of South Korea looks like the yellow coa is more common. but i'm not the export, so if you say the other one is better... Ramiy 13:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
File:Playbuzz logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

162.221.19.194 20:05, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Playbuzz logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Knox387 (talk) 20:09, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]