Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Babyrousa babyrussa Crane.jpg

File:Babyrousa babyrussa Crane.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2010 at 18:21:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Babyrousa babyrussa Crane.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Babyrousa babyrussa Crane.jpg

2198

846

396

601

6143

4095

A tad overexposed IMO --Slaunger (talk) 22:38, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Info created and uploaded by Didier Descouens - nominated by -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:21, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:21, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Well done and beautiful! But what are those large and curved fangs for? They seem useless this way! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:54, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
  • In a way, they are useless. Only the males have them, to impress the females. They serve no practical purpose. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:01, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
    • Not useless at all! Is there anything more useful for males than impressing females? ;o) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:01, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

I realize only now that nommination. Thank you The High Fin Sperm Whale.

These are the most sexual ornaments idiots out there, because it is not uncommon for these canines pierce the skull and are the cause of death of the animal. They exist in that form only in males.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:03, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:39, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Well done! - LeavXC (talk) 21:12, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Rama (talk) 21:23, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Impresive animal, good photo --Mile (talk) 22:11, 29 November 2010 (UTC).
•  Neutral tending towards support. High quality and interesting subject. I think there is a small problem with areas being a tad overexposed, leading to loss of some details, see note. --Slaunger (talk) 22:40, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

 Done Well done ... as usual! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:20, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Looks like a picture made by Archaeodontosaurus !!--Jebulon (talk) 00:57, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Fascinating educational subject, great lighting and composition. Steven Walling 02:03, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:42, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --FieldMarine (talk) 22:20, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment Please add where this is located to the picture description. Any additional details would be appreciated. Thanks. FieldMarine (talk) 22:24, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

• This is a studio shot. If you want to know were Archaeodontosaurus' studio is, then you'll have to ask him. Or did you mean were it comes from originally? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 03:13, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

• I would think this piece has some history & knowing that would make the image more interesting, at leaset to me personally. Where was this found & how old is it, etc. Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 03:30, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

• Agree with FieldMarine. --Slaunger (talk) 07:23, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

I had not imagined that this skull might interest you much. It is a skull of a young adult purchased for studies of comparative anatomy with fossil forms. This is a private company specializing in the restoration of fossils in central France. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:49, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

•  Support --Llez (talk) 16:36, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Mbz1 (talk) 03:14, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects