Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cathedrale Notre-Dame de Paris nef nouvelles cloches.jpg

File:Cathedrale Notre-Dame de Paris nef nouvelles cloches.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Feb 2013 at 08:50:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Cathedrale Notre-Dame de Paris nef nouvelles cloches.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cathedrale Notre-Dame de Paris nef nouvelles cloches.jpg

•  Info created by Myrabella - uploaded by Myrabella - nominated by Myrabella -- Myrabella (talk) 08:50, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

 Info The new bells of Notre Dame de Paris are on public display in the nave in February 2013. Here seen without a crowd of people.

•  Support -- Myrabella (talk) 08:50, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Very rare event(s), even unique, and pretty good picture IMO. Never seen this, and never seen the nave empty of people ! (Notre-Dame de Paris is one of the most visited monument in the world). Very good conclusion of an excellent idea of Wikimedia France ! --Jebulon (talk) 12:41, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support agree with Jebulon. Tomer T (talk) 12:58, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:36, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sharpness problems... Really pity... --A.Savin 17:12, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Great shot! -Godot13 (talk) 18:38, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support I agree with Jebulon. Thanks to Wikimedia France. Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 20:55, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 09:39, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support-- Peter23 (talk) 14:45, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose sharpness and the bottom crop aren't excellent --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:30, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose By Carschten (composition) + level of detail in dark areas became a victim of massive noise reduction. In the case of such motives the use of HDR is recommendable. --Tuxyso (talk) 18:18, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Very nice composition but image quality is not good enough: general unsharpness and lack of detail (due to denoising?) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:53, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

• (or because of the haze made by incense smoke ?) Thank you for the review anyway. --Myrabella (talk) 17:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

•  Support -- although sharpness and crop aren't excellent. --Arcalino (talk) 08:13, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 10:13, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Wow --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:03, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support--Godot13 (talk) 07:35, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:14, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PierreSelim (talk) 12:44, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors