Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dome of Cappella Paolina in Santa Maria Maggiore (Roma).jpg

File:Dome of Cappella Paolina in Santa Maria Maggiore (Roma).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2017 at 19:35:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dome of Cappella Paolina in Santa Maria Maggiore (Roma).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dome of Cappella Paolina in Santa Maria Maggiore (Roma).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
•  Info All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:35, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:35, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support lNeverCry 04:11, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:16, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:25, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:27, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose. We already had a similar candidate here which didn't pass. The main critizism there was that the WB was too cool. This picture here has the same issue. Besides that, I think this one lacks contrast and saturation. Additionally a geocode is missing and the description is far from being sufficient for FP. What do we see? Who painted the frescoes? When were they painted? I still don't get it why you never add an Italian description. You're a native speaker and a description in a second language could be very useful for a lot of users. Just placing one's camera on the floor and uploading the result to Commons is just not enough for FP in my opinion. --Code (talk) 19:12, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

• The WB,contrast and saturation are perfect. Geocode and the descripiption is the same of all my other FP however, I do not consider you an objective person as you know.Plus you are so offensive and naive that you think there isn't work behind? Only a camera on a tripod (on the floor probably put you) and that's it? But please be serious. So this discussion is useless as your comment,in my opinion. --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:09, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

• LivioAndronico, you've been on good behavior (from what I've seen) since your return. Don't backslide and remember what happened before. Is this photo geocoded? Is there an Italian-language description? I see you didn't address those things. And the question of who painted the frescoes is one I've given up asking you but previously wanted to know. I'm tending to find Code's sober expression of opinion more persuasive than your hot dismissal of him. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:50, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: say:"Just placing one's camera on the floor and uploading the result to Commons is just not enough for FP in my opinion." it is definitely a nice way of saying something, but treated as a child, especially after more than 100 FP. If for you it is a way of making nice, then I apologize, but I do not consider this, you can ask the saturation, artist, etc., but they are all things that one can "fix". --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:46, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
• @Livioandronico2013: I'm sorry if I was wrong regarding the efforts you have to make to create such photos. I'm honestly curious: What else do you do to make such photos of ceilings? I really want to know as I'm always willing to improve my own skills. Concerning WB and saturation I still believe that they are far from being perfect. I know this church very well and that's not what it looks like. But well, maybe you're trying an artistic approach, then it might just be a matter of taste. --Code (talk) 08:55, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

• @Code: What a question is that? .... Then what do you do more than point a camera on any object? The same is that these kind of photos and that is: perspective, cuts, contrast, saturation, etc. Then if you believe that the saturation etc are not to your taste is ok, but it is not respectful to others, or are more ignorant of you? Also write "Just placing one's camera on the floor and uploading the result to Commons is just not enough for FP in my opinion." is a compliment in germany i think --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:46, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

• Another of these discussions which are leading to nowhere. So sad! --Code (talk) 11:53, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

• if you had not insulted or making fun of other people it do not exist. And you would not be sad. --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 11:58, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Hovewer  Done Ikan Kekek --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:28, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 21:05, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment and remark: as I noticed that there are people of several cultures on these discussions and sometimes is not possible to recognize the border between formal and sarcastic language, can we please stay on referential language only and avoid (no exception) anything that might sound either as sarcasm, mockery, criticism of the person, demeaning of one's skills, accusations of lack of objectivity and whatever else, please? Thanks. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 13:22, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:51, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 09:53, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors