Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gran Mezquita de Isfahán, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 34-36 HDR.jpg

File:Gran Mezquita de Isfahán, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 34-36 HDR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2016 at 07:06:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Gran Mezquita de Isfahán, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 34-36 HDR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gran Mezquita de Isfahán, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 34-36 HDR.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info created & uploaded by User:Poco a poco - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:06, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - An unusual mosque photo and particularly beautiful at full screen. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:06, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Though it is so very nearly 16:9 that I'd recommend a crop to that. -- Colin (talk) 07:27, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

  Will take care of that tonight, Colin Poco² 10:40, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

  It took me longer, but  Done now, Colin Poco² 21:19, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 08:00, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support lNeverCry 08:15, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --cart-Talk 09:09, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Cool pic :) Thank you Ikan for this nom!! Poco² 10:40, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

• You're welcome. Thanks for taking it! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:59, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --The Photographer 11:29, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:11, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Another lovely abstract Iranian ceiling (Not sure from the window above if it's tilted or it's the window, though ... seems to be the latter). Daniel Case (talk) 19:09, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 08:33, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Question The sky is gray or brightness was artificially lowered? --The Photographer 10:09, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

  Yes, The Photographer, that grey due was due to a too strong highlights reduction, I have moderated it. --Poco² 20:21, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your answer, I will keep my suppor vote --The Photographer 20:33, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose Got some questions on pic, see notes. Also think is very gray inside, and maybe right side could be enlightened a bit more if RAW is available. --Mile (talk) 14:34, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support A windows. I think is much better then before. --Mile (talk) 05:59, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

  Mile: What does RAW stand for? never heard of that. :) Those openings are not showing directly the sky, I think that there was a kind of cover. I have brightened the right dome and reduce the highlight compensation --Poco² 20:21, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

• This improved the picture, but did it really look like this, or did it look more like what you had before? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:53, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

• Ikan, I applied the change because I believe that it does look now more realistic than before, otherwise I wouldn't have applied it. In general this kind of changes should not be applied to make it look nicer but closer to reality. Poco² 07:39, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks for the reassurance. I totally agree with that, but I think you can understand why I asked. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:40, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:03, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 11:56, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:57, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --Claus 08:45, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 15:19, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings