Commons:Requests and votes/Miya

Miya

 Support = 23;  Oppose = 1;  Neutral = about 3 depending on your count :) - 95.8% - Some concerns were raised... it is good advice for EVERY admin to remember that adminship is a promise of service to the community, not a badge of authority and that we operate by consensus, not by assertion. Nevertheless the consensus to promote is clear. Promoted ++Lar: t/c 15:35, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Links for Miya: Miya (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

I am a native Japanese speaker and a sysop in Japanese Wikipedia (ja:User:Miya). These days the number of images that needs to be checked in Japanese is getting to increase. And quite a few ja-speaking users seem to have difficulty in answering questions in English. As there is so few admins who can speak Japanese, I would be happy if I can be an admin here. Thank you. --miya 01:00, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Votes

•  Support - En + Ja argument is enough for me. giggy _(:O) 04:49, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
•  Support yep, looks good Mutter Erde 07:59, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Miya was very helpful during the POTY competition in coordinating translations, publicising the event and helping users. Japanese is probably the language we are most in need of admins for, so definite support. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 09:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• Long time experienced user of commons and the .ja will be very useful. Thanks for helping --Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:41, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
•  Support per deleted contribs. abf /talk to me/ 09:57, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Helpful user with .ja skills. →Яocket°°° 16:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
•  Support A helpful user with skills that we need. -- Bryan (talk to me) 17:45, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
•  Support - should be good. --- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 21:15, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
•  Support as pfct. Jahiegel 05:17, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
•  Support The tools will make this helpful user better able to assist the Community. Great addition to admin team. FloNight♥♥♥ 10:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --MichaelMaggs 22:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
• ♥ Support absolutely. Good correspondent as well. Cary Bass ^demandez 03:33, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
•  Support the experience is needed here. 哦，是吗？(O-person) 04:04, 06 February 2008 (GMT)
•  Support --Herrick 12:15, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
•  Support No problems here. RedCoat 15:16, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
•  Support. WjBscribe 16:15, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
•  Support. Good contrib record and if he's an admin on another wiki, even better. — Rlevse • Talk • 03:48, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
•  Support — DarkFalls ^talk 06:34, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ra'ike T C 10:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Chatama 23:52, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Yassie 00:50, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
•  Support--hyolee2/H.L.LEE 01:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --ZCU 09:48, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
• Lightly  Oppose あまり仕事を増やさないほうが身のためだと個人的には思っています。--Goki 09:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Comments

•  Neutral--Snusmumrik000 22:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Basically, Miya was very helpful and active user in jawp. However, she made numerous fruitless controversy, or even "destructive activities" in the projects of WMF (esp. jawp, and meta-wiki) for more than 4 years (i.e. ja:Wikipedia:コメント依頼/0null0 (Request for Comments), Some links, ja:Wikipedia:コメント依頼/Miya_20070506, ja:Wikipedia‐ノート:コメント依頼/Suisui20070111#Miyaさんの甚だしい事実誤認に対する補足説明, Multiposts made by Miya, Template_Talk:新しい画像#条件つき賛成理由について, etc.). And as a sysop of jawp, she had abused her sysop status again and again, I think. (i.e. ja:Wikipedia:投稿ブロック依頼/とあるユーザー20050510 (Request for Blocking), ja:Wikipedia:コメント依頼/Miya_20070623, etc.). I think she is a person unfit for the sysop in any project of WMF.
  • However I am mere a new user here in Commons. And also I hope that she quits such destructive activities in jawp immediately if she becomes a sysop in Commons and works here vigorously. Therefore I dare saying "neutral".--Snusmumrik000 22:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
  • （日本語） Neutral--Snusmumrik000 22:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC)基本的には、Miya氏は、JAWPにおいて、とても親切でアクティブなユーザーでした。しかしながら、彼女は、4年以上の間、特に、JAWPやmetaにおいて、「破壊的な活動」とすらいえるような、おびただしい数の不毛な論争を引き起こしてきました（上記英文に示したリンク等を参照）。また、JAWPの管理者として、彼女は、何度も繰り返し、その権限を濫用したと、私は考えています（同）。私は、彼女が、ウィキメディア財団内のいかなるプロジェクトにおいても、管理者としては、不適任であると考えています。
    • しかしながら、私は、コモンズにおいては、「新規ユーザー」に過ぎません。また、Miya氏がコモンズにおいて管理者となった場合に、ここで活発に活動することで、JAWPでの「破壊的な活動」を、直ちに止めていただくことを、私は望んでいます。このため、あえて、「中立」といたします。--Snusmumrik000 22:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Comments are always welcome even if you're a new user. (They don't need to be accompanied by a vote if you don't want to.) I wish I could better understand the issues you and Yassie both raised here, but Google translator has a long way to go. "Fruitless controversy" doesn't sound good especially since we like things more mellow here than most wikis, but Miya's contributions here have been nothing but positive. And I also hopes she works here vigorously ;) →Rocket°°° 07:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Did you notice I admit Miya's contribution both in jawp and in commons, and support her adminship? I stated my concern because I do not want Miya to be like that A-word named meta sysop, who is already indefinitely blocked from jawp and soon to be desysoped in meta. Also, I am not a new user here anyway - I have 1,700+ edits in commons so far. [1] Yassie 13:21, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

• I welcome and hereby support Miya's adminship here in Commons, yet I have one concern. Please do not say things like "Do not say anything against me, just obey me and use Commons, for I am a sysop of Commons". Please remember a meta sysop has been indifinitely blocked from JAWP by kept doing that there for more than three years, and is about to be desysoped in meta. I admit Miya is a great conrtibutor both in JAWP and in Commons, as well as Miya.m, so I would not like Miya to follow that user's path. I personally thought that was a dangerous symptom. Yassie 01:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
•  Neutral--In operating ability side,Miya is a good admin,I think.but Miya sometimes sets too great store by private-human-relation on editing,I feel.GcG 07:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC)