Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:79 - Québec - Juin 2009(Edit).jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2009 at 14:39:28

0EV version (non-HDR)

Info New version of the image made from comments on the first nomination. I manually stitched the water and I darken a little the halos in the sky surrounding some of the buildings. For the unnatural look claims mentionned in the first nomination, I've uploaded the non-HDR version of the panorama (which has both over and underexposition). IMO, the HDR version is truly superior, even if the dynamic range manipulations are obvious. --S23678 (talk) 14:39, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- S23678 (talk) 14:39, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better --ka ʁs tn 14:57, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Very good quality and composition, lots of wow. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:04, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superbe. Sémhur (talk) 18:58, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good quality. Greetings Zsoni 19:53, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. --Karel (talk) 21:30, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:17, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Simpledot (talk) 22:44, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ianaré (talk) 06:03, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support ----Kaosrimo (talk) 08:15, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Otherwise superb, but stitches on water are still visible, even on thumbnails. —kallerna™ 12:49, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But I DID told the water to stay still. Of course, there's always ways to make this panorama look better, but, given the liquid nature of water, I think I cannot blend those seems completely (especially since the fast changing light conditions does not allows for multiple takes). Still, I'm glad that you did not opposed. --S23678 (talk) 03:51, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you use a strong enough neutral density filter then you can get rid of the ripples. Probably wouldn't give you enough time to stitch a panorama at that time of day though. Noodle snacks (talk) 01:51, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Doucus (talk) 10:18, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Fantastic --Tom dl (talk) 13:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Like this one very much! Hannes (talk) 21:30, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Tired time (talk) 09:31, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! Very good, high resolution! Only the water is done sloppy -- Ukuthenga (talk) 22:11, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 18:47, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support ■ MMXX^talk 11:31, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 12:08, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The haloing around the city silhouette makes the wow go away for me (HDR version) -- Klaus with K (talk) 16:24, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support~~  Richard  [®]  23:50, 26 June 2009 (UTC) Vote added after end of voting period. Maedin\^talk 12:34, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ --Ocre (talk) 06:12, 27 June 2009 (UTC) Vote added after end of voting period. Maedin\^talk 12:34, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Maedin\^talk 12:34, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu