Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mravaldzali st.George catheral.JPG

File:Mravaldzali st.George catheral.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2010 at 15:08:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mravaldzali st.George catheral.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mravaldzali st.George catheral.JPG

•  Info created by Rati Skhirtladze - uploaded by George - nominated by George -- Gaeser (talk) 15:08, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Gaeser (talk) 15:08, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --ჯაბა ლაბაძე (talk) 15:15, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support--თეკა (talk) 15:38, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Beautiful in small size, but fairly unsharp. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 16:16, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unsharp, some CA is present, noisy sky--Mbz1 (talk) 16:32, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose The approved file name format is with lower case jpg. The file is not in line with basic guidelines, so I think it should fail because of this. Snowmanradio (talk) 19:00, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support it's not perfect technicaly but it got my heart. Basik07 (talk) 23:01, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Exactly. Never mind technology failed here a bit... I can breathe Georgian air for a while. Blago Tebi (talk) 00:53, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Mbz1 & because of contrast problem. Takabeg (talk) 02:18, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support To partially counteract the JPG-oppose. I don't think that is a good reason to fail. The file name can be changed easily if it's inconsistent with the regulations - just post a rename request. We shouldn't need to go through a whole new FP evaluation just because of a small technicality like that. --99of9 (talk) 08:30, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Brute (Talk) 10:02, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Very good shot. Unfortunately, the camera's skills are far far behind the photographer's. --MattiPaavola (talk) 15:55, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose noisy and not too sharp. --ianaré (talk) 15:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support--Tokoko (talk) 09:08, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - I agree with Basik07. Cousin Kevin (talk) 20:50, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unsharp. Basar (talk) 00:12, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Gota (talk) 09:34, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sharpness I'm afraid --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:15, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:58, 14 January 2010 (UTC)