Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sava Bohinjka.jpg

File:Sava Bohinjka.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2010 at 17:21:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Sava Bohinjka.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sava Bohinjka.jpg

•  Info created by Szasza - uploaded by Szasza - nominated by Szasza -- Szasza (talk) 17:21, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Info Upper Sava Bohinjka in Slovenia.
•  Support -- Szasza (talk) 17:21, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support, already a featured image on Hungarian Wikipedia, I hope it'll get featured here too :) – Alensha ^msg 17:33, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support, Doncsecz (talk) 17:47, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support why not? :)   ■ MMXX  ^talk  19:48, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - CA --MattiPaavola (talk) 20:37, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:57, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral Beautiful composition, but the water on the left is neither sharp nor intentionally blurred --Pjt56 (talk) 22:24, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Question What is that artificial thing in center right? —kallerna™ 10:19, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment i think this is a drinking water exception dot. Szasza (talk) 11:47, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I would have voted neutral without that drinking water exception dot. The photo itself in stunning, but there's too many problems with quality. It's too soft and blurry, CA and partly overburnt. Sorry. —kallerna™ 14:04, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - Szajci ^reci 18:09, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose as Kallerna --Böhringer (talk) 22:23, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose The wow is not there for me and there are valid issues raised above. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Einstein2 (talk) 16:34, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose as Kallerna --Leafnode✉ 13:04, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose per issues above. --99of9 (talk) 11:04, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Madura Máté ^talkstreet 14:13, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --OrsolyaVirág (talk) 17:24, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good image but not good enough for FP IMO. --Cayambe (talk) 18:46, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --•Teroses^{je t'écoute} 13:59, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:44, 13 January 2010 (UTC)