Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Southern sea lion, L'Oceanogràfic (1).jpg/2

File:Southern sea lion, L'Oceanogràfic (1).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2018 at 20:58:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Southern sea lion, L'Oceanogràfic (1).jpg/2 Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Southern sea lion, L'Oceanogràfic (1).jpg/2

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora
•  Info Southern sea lion (Otaria flavescens) at L'Oceanogràfic. All by KTC -- KTC (talk) 20:58, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Info Another renomination thanks to Livioandronico2013/Σπάρτακος/Architas. Previous nomination here.
•  Support -- KTC (talk) 20:58, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't think the sharpness and level of detail are high enough on this one. Also, can I just say: I'm not sure I agree that all of these should be renominated, at least not if the vote was very close. As this one made it through only thanks to one illegitimate vote, is it really worth bringing it up again? It's not like it won in a landslide. Or is that the point, to only nominate the close ones? --Peulle (talk) 21:54, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

  They are all close, since only the ones where striking one of the double vote made a difference from promotion to not are being demoted. If striking the double vote didn't make a difference to the result, the image stays a featured image. (Ignoring the current proposal here to demote all of L/Σ/A images where there's double voting.) There's also some that would had featured if not for double opposes. Those aren't being promoted though. At least one of the renomination below is such an image. -- KTC (talk) 22:21, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

• The files who had a failed nom because of the double vote are not automatically promoted. However, the users have been notified and a message has been placed on the noms that they can be renominated. If you open the list and click on some of the 'fixed' noms, you will see this. --Cart (talk) 22:26, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

• (Edit conflict) Peulle, only nominations where the outcome was changed by removing one sock vote are eligible for re-nomination at this point. They are all listed in the "Where extra vote changed the result" on the FPC talk page. I'm fixing the affected noms and informing the nominators, but it will take some time since it's a lot of work. --Cart (talk) 22:23, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
• OK, I understand. Let's all just vote on images as if we're seeing the image for the first time. :) --Peulle (talk) 22:48, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose Good, but not extraordinary, considering it's a zoo shot. --El Grafo (talk) 07:48, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Quite good for me. --Yann (talk) 08:03, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose A zoo shot for this type of mammal would have to be better than this. Charles (talk) 09:20, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per above. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:59, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Peulle and El Grafo. Daniel Case (talk) 14:17, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC)