Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Šopsko kolo, XVIII Duna.jpg

File:Šopsko kolo, XVIII Duna.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2016 at 20:39:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Šopsko kolo, XVIII Duna.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Šopsko kolo, XVIII Duna.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- The Photographer (talk) 20:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- The Photographer (talk) 20:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Kruusamägi (talk) 22:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I like the subject matter, but I'm opposing this because it's not sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Yes, however, look the weather conditions it's 7 pm (Budapest time and 1:30pm Venezuela time) and dancing!, it's not a building and you can't apply the same rule --The Photographer (talk) 00:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

I understand the challenge, but we're talking about a Featured Picture here. I think it should be more outstanding to be featured. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

• Weak  Support per last time. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

   Question - This was nominated before? When? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Budapest culture.jpg -- Colin (talk) 21:50, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose September 18, 2013. No significant changes. Per Ikan Kekek.--Jebulon (talk) 10:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Owain Knight (talk) 18:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Drzewianin (talk) 19:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Vodnokon4e (talk) 20:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Ikan and Jebulon. Daniel Case (talk) 04:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others, sorry. --Code (talk) 06:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Ikan & others. INeverCry 03:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Don't see any reason for renomination. Not special enough to rise above good tourist photo. -- Colin (talk) 21:50, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Think the improvement is visible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caballero1967 (talk • contribs)
•  Support --Stanqo (talk) 12:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:13, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:52, 18 February 2016 (UTC)