Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Atelier Nadar - Jacques Isnardon, Vaudeville.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2022 at 15:30:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Atelier Nadar - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:30, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:30, 4 April 2022 (UTC)- Support --Yann (talk) 17:45, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Comment I guess that was good sharpness in those days, right? What about the lighting? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:42, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Given it has good dark-light contrast, I'd say pretty good. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, is this about how it's darker around him? Pretty sure that's just artistic dodging to fade out the edge of the photo in an interesting way, kind of the photographic equivalent of a painting like this. Photo editing hardly began in our generation, but aesthetic tastes change. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:35, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Photo editing pretty much started with the inception of photography itself. Photomontage, for instance, is nothing that needed Photoshop to become popular. Early superstars like Le Gray were master manipulators - out of sheer necessity. Otherwise "HDR" (hehe) images would have been impossible. To all romanticists who still believe that it was digital photography that killed off the holy concept of authenticity: Go to your room - that discussion started in the 1850s (seriously)!
--Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Photo editing pretty much started with the inception of photography itself. Photomontage, for instance, is nothing that needed Photoshop to become popular. Early superstars like Le Gray were master manipulators - out of sheer necessity. Otherwise "HDR" (hehe) images would have been impossible. To all romanticists who still believe that it was digital photography that killed off the holy concept of authenticity: Go to your room - that discussion started in the 1850s (seriously)!
- Oh, is this about how it's darker around him? Pretty sure that's just artistic dodging to fade out the edge of the photo in an interesting way, kind of the photographic equivalent of a painting like this. Photo editing hardly began in our generation, but aesthetic tastes change. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:35, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Given it has good dark-light contrast, I'd say pretty good. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Interesting discussion, guys. I feel like the subject is himself in shadow. There's more light on the outer parts of the photo. I find that very strange. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:25, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- I don't know what might have caused that effect. I wouldn't say the subject is really in shadow. Isnardon does cast a shadow though and the outer parts of the background are remarkably bright, sure. I do like it actually. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:21, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:07, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:39, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Hulged (talk) 10:10, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support --IamMM (talk) 10:21, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:56, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:14, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 15:43, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452440 01:07, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 04:08, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:57, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men
