Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bredevoort (NL), Parkbank -- 2016 -- 1398.jpg

File:Bredevoort (NL), Parkbank -- 2016 -- 1398.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2016 at 09:36:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bredevoort (NL), Parkbank -- 2016 -- 1398.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bredevoort (NL), Parkbank -- 2016 -- 1398.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info created by XRay - uploaded by XRay - nominated by W.carter -- w.carter-Talk 09:36, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- w.carter-Talk 09:36, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Not bad, but not one of XRay's best. XRay, do you consider this photo featurable? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:44, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Support I'm happy to see others nominating my pictures I'd never expected they could be FP(C). Thanks to W.carter (and all others nominating my pictures). I love this bench seen in Bredevoort. May be another image (like File:Bredevoort (NL), Parkbank -- 2016 -- 1397.jpg) is better (from my point of view). And Ikan Kekek is right, I would not have nominated this one. But it's (only) my point of view. Thanks to W.carter and his point of view. --XRay ^talk 15:04, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

• You're welcome, I really like this pic, a lot more than the other you mentioned. In this pic the bench is reclining peacefully in the foliage, a strand of leaves leaning over it, in the other it looks as if the bench is tipping over and being swallowed by the greenery. The perspective also add to this pic over the other's Audrey-style. w.carter-Talk 15:18, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Support I underline every word of w.carter. A very great image. So romantic, so genuine, so inviting. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:41, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support cool :-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Seat not to sit:) -- Zcebeci (talk) 19:12, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 20:09, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Not the sort of thing you'd think would be featurable, but it is, for certain je ne sais quoi reasons, as we say in English . Thanks again for showing how there is nothing, at least not that can be photographed freely, that cannot be a featured image in the right photographer's hands. Daniel Case (talk) 03:58, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, my point exacly. Since I come here to Commons from the writing side at Wikipedia, I'd really like an FP for every article/weird subject on the WP not just landscapes or churches. ;) I think it'll be ready about the year 2158 or so. w.carter-Talk 13:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Support I'm convinced. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:28, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:48, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose  Comment Sorry XRay, this foto is not ringing to me. This one may be the one. --Laitche (talk) 21:13, 9 August 2016 (UTC) Deja vu? --Laitche (talk) 14:12, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support − Meiræ 23:17, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Spurzem (talk) 22:12, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /INeverCry 17:23, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects