Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cambodia. Water buffaloes.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Cambodia. Water buffaloes.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2020 at 23:37:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info created by, uploaded by and nominated by Dmitry Makeev(talk) 23:37, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Knopik-som (talk) 23:37, 18 January 2020 (UTC)- Support -- Fischer.H (talk) 16:16, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:03, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
- Support I like the earth tones and the detail. Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- Support Daniel is right about the detail, and the composition of the portrait is pleasing and restful. I'm sorry for the water buffalo, though, because he is being attacked by flies, poor thing. :( -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:56, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:56, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Support And seven --Llez (talk) 14:09, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:04, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Great photo. But I must have none of the rope through the nose!--Famberhorst (talk) 16:24, 23 January 2020 (UTC)- Oppose Per Famberhorst. It is a terrible sight. Also the grass in the foreground disturbs me in this picture. --Hockei (talk) 18:43, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Comment - It is a terrible sight, but I won't oppose on that basis. The most I do in cases in which I can't emotionally stomach supporting a photo is not vote on it. Examples of when I did include a photo of a heroic equestrian statue of noted Jew-mass-murderer Khmelnitsky, and I also couldn't bring myself to vote on the picture of the sphynx kitten that doesn't merit being opposed on the basis of picture quality. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:34, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I just express my aversion to animal suffering. Changes usually start small.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:09, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
- Comment If animal cruelty were the subject of the picture, I might have a different perspective then. But that's not the issue, I see how cruelty to animals is taken for granted by simply taking a "nice" picture of an animal and not seeing the suffering or not caring. Not to forget the grass. Otherwise good quality, no question. --Hockei (talk) 07:57, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Hockei Poco a poco (talk) 17:47, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per hockei. It's not that I would oppose something like this purely on ethical grounds, but the ethics of it does raise the "wow" bar for me. In this case, I probably would've just abstained if the rope weren't there. — Rhododendrites talk | 18:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals
