Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CraneDistorted190831.jpg

File:CraneDistorted190831.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2021 at 10:15:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:CraneDistorted190831.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CraneDistorted190831.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
•  Info created & uploaded by Bjwhite66212 - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:15, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:15, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Lmbuga (talk) 11:24, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Nice. It may be worth correcting the slight tilt (note how the top row slopes upward). — Rhododendrites ^talk |  13:56, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Commonists 18:49, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

• Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 17:15, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Support --IamMM (talk) 19:42, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Rhododendrites. The tilt ruins it, because the whole structure is so geometrical, and these straight lines are even the main feature of this photograph -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:49, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
• @Tomer T and Basile Morin: The uploader doesn't appear very active, so FYI I uploaded a new version. The only thing I did was address the lines, and it's possible another crop would be desirable (the perspective correction leaves just a sliver at the top). — Rhododendrites ^talk |  01:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

• Thanks for the effort but sorry: too tight now -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:04, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

• If you look at the top-right of the original, it's clear it would be impossible to straighten it with any more room than that. Only options would be to leave it crooked or crop it more off the top. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  18:15, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

• Agree. Hence my oppose. It might have been possible to get a pleasant thickness from the original (unfortunately unavailable). Or DIY something with Photoshop, but that's tricky. Currently too weird, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:30, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
•  Weak support Great, but still not straight. --Aristeas (talk) 14:29, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  • There does seem to be a slight amount of distortion more visible along the bottom. I don't have time to give it another go. Anyone is free to do so, assuming the uploader doesn't object, or to revert to the original, I suppose. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  18:15, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 17:38, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
•  Support OvalThunder9^💬 20:46, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
•  Support. Meiræ 18:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:20, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:46, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulphere 09:43, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:33, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Machines