Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Durdle Door Dorset Sunset.jpg

File:Durdle Door Dorset Sunset.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Feb 2014 at 22:42:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Durdle Door Dorset Sunset.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Durdle Door Dorset Sunset.jpg

•  Info all by Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:42, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Thank you very much for sharing this, it is a relief to see a good picture. --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 23:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Composition is incredible. —Mono 02:29, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Sorry; I still prefer your old super FP. Although the subject is interesting; I failed to see the scope for two FPs. Jee 02:48, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment A relief to see a good picture?? super FP?? I haven't seen so much sucking up here before. You really are the Lord of the Flies. Correct me if I'm wrong but this picture was a alternative of previous nomination and now you have nominated it again? --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 09:18, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

• No; the nom. I mentioned above is at EN which has different review criteria. My comment above is also per my personal POV; not about its quality on aesthetic aspects. There is not a requirement that a reviewer need to be capable to take competitive pictures. But he had a lot of FPs earlier; and this make a Flickr Explore #1 recently. Jee 09:46, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

• Picture you are referring to is really excellent. --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 11:10, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose The sea is unnaturally dark and the same with half of the cliff. I haven't been there myself but a quick google search gives me pictures with much better lighting, for example here. Apart from this, a long exposure would certainly add some wow to the photo but now it's just a snapshot. I would expected something more from someone with so "high standards" and extremely critical towards others. --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 09:18, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

 Comment Please do not make personal attacks. You should refer to comment on the image. It is the best way to bring this section, the most balanced, technically and objectively as possible. I invite you to reflect and stop this negative attitude. On the other hand, from the technical point of view, the example you have shown me a picture much more digitally modified than the current nomination (look the sky and overexposition, for example). I lived on the coast for 30 years and have seen similar colors to this photo. --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 12:48, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment I wished a MUCH tighter crop at the top (see note) and a wider crop at the right. I am unsure if the light is fortunate for that motive. Most parts of the relief are in shadow. Contrary the warm light on the sand is nice. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:52, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good comments by Tuxyso. Hopefully addressed. Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. and Mono are asked if they still support. Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:35, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I will support the tighter crop at the top :) --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 22:52, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Support New crop is perfect IMO. --DXR (talk) 00:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Better with the new crop. Yann (talk) 04:24, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Much better. You also improved the light (probably a bit overdone, but that's a matter of taste). --Tuxyso (talk) 08:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 08:29, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Very good --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Nice colours and picture, but I find the people rather distracting. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 15:29, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

The people is to underestand the real size of the natural monument --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 16:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Oh... (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 16:43, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

 CommentI invite you to read this. About using people to measuring scales. --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 11:57, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

I've just read it. BTW, please take a look: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Arctic_Kangaroo&diff=117042047&oldid=116984406 (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 16:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 06:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 10:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 11:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Tamba52 (talk) 16:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Composition is very good, but I am shared, IMO it's a little bit oversatured (yellow, orange and red), I can particularly see it on the clothes of the characters but however the color give the mood. Anyway a nice image. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --MichaelMaggs (talk) 10:13, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Halavar (talk) 17:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Leitoxx 13:47, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support —Blurred Lines 17:26, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 12:15, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural