Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flea Scanning Electron Micrograph False Color.jpg

File:Flea Scanning Electron Micrograph False Color.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2010 at 01:28:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Flea Scanning Electron Micrograph False Color.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flea Scanning Electron Micrograph False Color.jpg

•  Info created by CDC - uploaded by Raeky - nominated by Econt (talk) -- Econt (talk) 01:28, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Econt (talk) 01:28, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Wow. --Captain Bradley (talk) 07:22, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Very interesting and nice scientific image. Jacopo Werther (talk) 08:45, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:42, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Amazing!   ■ MMXX  ^talk  20:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Makes me want to scratch... ;) Durova (talk) 21:25, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:27, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose b/w is more encyclopedic - what motivates pink? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:45, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Why on earth is b/w more encyclopaedic - if that were the case there would be few colour images available here? --Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

It is like coloring the animal in this photo pink. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 09:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

However in a repository of freely licensed images a coloured one with good EV can be desaturated if anyone wishes to do so. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

•  Support --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:35, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods