Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Géiseres Sol de Mañana, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 56.JPG

File:Géiseres Sol de Mañana, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 56.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2016 at 20:34:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Géiseres Sol de Mañana, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 56.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Géiseres Sol de Mañana, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 56.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
•  Info created by Diego Delso (User:Poco a poco) - uploaded by Diego Delso (User:Poco a poco) - nominated by Lmbuga -- Lmbuga (talk) 20:34, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Info Sol de Mañana ("Morning Sun" in Spanish) is a geothermal field in Sur Lípez Province, Potosi Department, south-western Bolivia. The field extends over 10 square kilometres (2,500 acres) and is between 4,800 metres (15,700 ft) and 5,000 metres (16,000 ft) high. There area, characterized by intense volcanic activity, with sulphur spring fields and mud lakes, has indeed no geysers but rather holes that emit pressurized steam up to 50 metres (160 ft) high.
•  Support -- Lmbuga (talk) 20:34, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - I looked through your geyser photos on Quality Images. I really couldn't decide which one had the best composition. I won't nitpick this one, though. It's stark and striking. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:49, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Truly a different place, thank you Miguel for this nomination! Poco² 21:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 21:47, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:59, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:22, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 11:50, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --The Photographer (talk) 12:32, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Halavar (talk) 13:46, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:00, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Hockei (talk) 12:50, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:41, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Sorry but overexposed: washed out colors. Sting (talk) 18:15, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Sting. FPs shouldn't have technical defects like this. -- Thennicke (talk) 04:56, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support I think the subdued colors actually make it work better. Daniel Case (talk) 19:10, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:17, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena