Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hochofen 5 Landschaftspark Duisburg Nord Abend 2013.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Hochofen 5 Landschaftspark Duisburg Nord Abend 2013.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2014 at 23:03:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info This photo shows one furnance of Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord located in the Ruhr district. The "park" is a huge former steel industry complex which is now accessible by the public and reminds the visitors of the coal and steel history of the region. At night the former furnaces are illuminated. The photo nominated here shows furnace No5 which has a visitors's plattform at the top of the tower.
created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Tuxyso, some retouch work by User:Kallex - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 23:03, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 23:03, 2 February 2014 (UTC)- Support — C M B J 04:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support Yann (talk) 06:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support and: oh no, the Landschaftspark was on my to do list as well... ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:49, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- It is only about ~10 kilometers from my home town thus I have some geo advantage :) But I can still encourage you to go there - a lot of motives are still waiting. If you plan to go there feel free to contact me, probably I can provide some information and give some tips. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:27, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support --JLPC (talk) 10:46, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Kallex (talk) 21:11, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Oppose bad light balance: outshining flood light on the one side and a uninformative and lowly lightened bottom part with disturbing tree hangover. I admit: the colorful lights are appealing, but the image in in general is not featureable with the mentioned issues. --Wladyslaw (talk) 22:43, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- You have got some bright spots on the building, you cannot change it because the spots are directed away from the building - imho it makes the photo more interesting. The darker areas are a nice contrast to the light on the building (structures are still visible) and I would like to take the steel balustrade at the left and right on the photo. I see not really a problem with trees - I was happy that it was winter because in spring / summer a lot of leafs hide important parts of the building. BTW: The darker area at the front is not accessible (fence). I searched very carfully for the best shooting position and think my solution was quite good with a nice perspective on the building. Nonetheless thx for your explanatory statement. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:28, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Der Holländer (talk) 13:20, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Qwertz1894 (talk) 15:10, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:12, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:34, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Neutral Interesting subject and good quality but the lighting of it makes it difficult for me to support, there are too many dark areas (I added a not with a different crop proposal). Poco2 09:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- I will think about creating an alternative, but I am not really convinced of your proposal. I would like to preserve the lines from the front left and right. IMHO the compo is quite balanced as it is. --Tuxyso (talk) 12:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support I think the image is good, in my opinion, the crop Poco suggested would be to tight. --EveryPicture (talk) 13:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Industry
