Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Colmano, Schwangau, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 15.JPG

File:Iglesia de San Colmano, Schwangau, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 15.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2015 at 19:45:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Colmano, Schwangau, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 15.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Colmano, Schwangau, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 15.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info Winter landscape of St Coloman church (de), located in Schwangau, Bavaria, southern Germany. St Coloman church is of baroque style and was constructed, the way it is today, in the 17th century in honor to Saint Coloman, replacing a chapel of the 15th century. The irish pilgrim is said to have taken a break at this spot in his pilgrimage to the Holy Land in 1012. Poco² 19:45, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 19:45, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment and  Oppose. Sorry, but there is not enough contrast between the white roofs and the white sky. Perhaps you can correct it. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:21, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Spurzem. When your subject and ground are both this white, a cloudy day just doesn't work for me. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:54, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

  Is that a problem of the processing?. I think that it can be like this for real. I am not sure what you expect me to do. Poco² 21:15, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

  I have a problem with the lighting, which unfortunately can't be fixed in post. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:47, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Support A nicely executed image in light tones. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:27, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
• regretful  Oppose as much as I want to support a picture of this marvellous church, I'm afraid I can't do so in this case. The lighting simply doesn't work for me here, sorry. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:14, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Because I like the composition and the snowy winter atmosphere. --Cayambe (talk) 17:09, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral White! and nearly wow but not true wow for me... --Laitche (talk) 19:09, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support White! --Ralf Roleček 19:15, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support. The winter will begin here in Brazil, say by the way. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:56, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:03, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I tend not to like taking winter pics on days like this either, but they inevitably occur. And when you don't have a lot of really bright colors to work with, something like this may actually work better when the sky is "a hazy shade of winter" Kudos to Paco for taking the risk here and avoiding the pitfalls. Daniel Case (talk) 19:18, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment I think there's an error of brush tool? I may be wrong? See note. --Laitche (talk) 19:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

  Thanks for the note, Laitche. It was a pretty big dust "snake" that I had accompanied me during a whole photo session :). I have uploaded a  new version. Poco² 20:04, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

  I think the "snake" was removed, Umm that exactly the same footprints (where the "snake" was) also should be removed... --Laitche (talk) 20:22, 16 June 2015 (UTC) I think that nobody notice unless you say it. --Laitche (talk) 20:57, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Composition works for me. -- Pofka (talk) 11:39, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:47, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings