Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:KässbohrerPB260DW 3.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:KässbohrerPB260DW 3.JPG, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2010 at 20:38:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created and uploaded by Böhringer - nominated by Sarcastic ShockwaveLover -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 20:38, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Being a resident of hot and dry Australia, I had never seen one of these odd machines before. Quite an interesting design.
- Support -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 20:38, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support Wolf (talk) 20:45, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support danke für die Nomination --Böhringer (talk) 20:49, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support Sehr gut! --George Chernilevsky talk 21:18, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Question Just out of curiousity George, what's the 3a mean? Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 22:24, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- in Russian за=support. It is not 1,2,3a. Transcription is za --George Chernilevsky talk 22:38, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Question Just out of curiousity George, what's the 3a mean? Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 22:24, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support Quality useful image (& always good to educate Australians...;)) --Herby talk thyme 11:59, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, to me this is one of those pictures, that could be QI or VI, but not FP. The centered composition is bit dull, the crop is bit tight and I can't see anything really special in it. —kallerna™ 15:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose technically fine, but for encyclopedic purposes (e.g. for Australians who have never seen such a machine ...) the part of it doing the actual work (i.e. the device at the back!) should be better visible. --Pjt56 (talk) 23:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose per kallerna. I'm Australian, and even I didn't get wowed :). --99of9 (talk) 10:53, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support Nice image. --High Contrast (talk) 10:22, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I agree with Kallerna. IMO not enough wow / outstanding enough for FP. Nikopol (talk) 15:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:43, 15 January 2010 (UTC)