Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Le Molkenrain.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Le Molkenrain.JPG, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2016 at 18:49:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
- Info created by Jörg Braukmann - uploaded by Milseburg - nominated by Milseburg -- Milseburg (talk) 18:49, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 18:49, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Pretty, and I like the composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:24, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support INeverCry 23:23, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support impressive, the distance to the Berner Alps is between 170 and 200 km. --Hubertl 00:08, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:43, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:04, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 13:47, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose An impressively done landscape above clouds. But it's just not working for me, perhaps because it's too dark. Daniel Case (talk) 17:19, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Too late in the day - not enough light. Charles (talk)
- Oppose Per others, and I find the crop at right a bit random.--Jebulon (talk) 00:10, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Dark and I don't find the composition convincing, sorry. — Julian H.✈ 10:04, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Insufficient image quality. If I would have seen this as QIC, I would have opposed. --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:54, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose The resolving power and signal to noise ratio of the camera used is poor, and the framing seems a bit arbitrary. dllu (t,c) 00:30, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Nice place, lighting time and composition, though a bit dark. However I don't think it's fixable as a brightening will add too much noise on the forest on the hills. I think the photo have been a bit underexposed. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Great potential, with the clouds, but composition isn't working and technically I agree it appears underexposed and lacking clarity. -- Colin (talk) 17:16, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:02, 1 January 2016 (UTC)