Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Memorial to the victims of Communism, Prague 3.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Memorial to the victims of Communism, Prague 3.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2022 at 13:14:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
- Info created by - uploaded by - nominated by Satdeep Gill -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 13:14, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 13:14, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support good contrast -- Wolf im Wald 03:01, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:59, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Gallery link improved. Your friendly gallery link service ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 08:32, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose This is a decent photo but the shadow, mainly on the shoulder at right, and the burnt areas are disturbing. --Cayambe (talk) 16:19, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sadly I have to agree with Cayambe. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:29, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support Works like an environmental portrait: the photo emphasizes the frontmost statue, but still hints to the complete monument in the background. With this subject high contrast is OK for me, the shadows add some drama to the statue’s face and I can still see many details in the shadows. --Aristeas (talk) 14:30, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree, light is not so good. --Mile (talk) 16:21, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. Good idea but light is just too harsh. Could be much better with an overcast sky, or backlight. --Kreuzschnabel 16:56, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. Love the spider. Daniel Case (talk) 20:12, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 15:02, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support Very in-your-face and somewhat disturbing, and that helps it work. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:41, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I wouldn't go so far as to call for an overcast day, but I think a bit less contrast on the subject would help. --El Grafo (talk) 10:21, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support per other supporters. Again and again during reviewing I am caught by this picture. The destroyed figures in the background make the whole scene. Great concept of the monument. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:52, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I support this photo for what it is, but the photo you linked seems to me to present a clearer depiction of the overall feel of the monument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you for your comment, Ikan. This photo made me curious about the monument because of the strong facial expression and the figures visible in the background. By linking to any example image, I wanted to point out the overall impression and expand/underline my reason for support. Equally as well I could have linked to the category. Best wishes, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:21, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Alternative[edit]
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
- Support --Satdeep Gill (talk) 12:03, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment @El Grafo, Kreuzschnabel, PetarM, SHB2000, and Cayambe: Any thoughts on the alternative image here? --Satdeep Gill (talk) 12:03, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose For the same reason I gave above. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:49, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The other version with more contrast affects me more. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:48, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:13, 2 October 2022 (UTC)