Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mercedes-Benz Concept CLA Class, IAA, Múnich, Alemania, 2023-09-10, DD 07.jpg

File:Mercedes-Benz Concept CLA Class, IAA, Múnich, Alemania, 2023-09-10, DD 07.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2023 at 10:07:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mercedes-Benz Concept CLA Class, IAA, Múnich, Alemania, 2023-09-10, DD 07.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mercedes-Benz Concept CLA Class, IAA, Múnich, Alemania, 2023-09-10, DD 07.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Automobiles
•  Info Mercedes-Benz Concept CLA Class, IAA in 2023, Munich, Germany. The vehicle is a concept car of the current Mercedes-Benz CLA-Class. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 10:07, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 10:07, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose All is ideal (car, lights, background), just you did not position well. Should be lower, to capture botom, and to cut some above background. Its not so sharp, despite low res. --Mile (talk) 12:33, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

• Bold statements, you talk about low res of a 25 MPx picture (which I cropped to square format) and you have a current FP of 4,4 MPx. Regarding POV and exposure I've to say that I have different versions with different POV and exposure but sorry, I like this one most. --Poco a poco (talk) 15:17, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

• Why do you say low res Mile? That would rule out any image from my camera. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:26, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment @Poco: good photographer should also position good, to cover with most area. My shot bellow is those "minimal" 4.4 Mpx (made od 5 MPx cam) but i covered 88%, while you put down 50%. You said have to cut to sqaure, good, but you take horizontal crop by 14%, i did 10%. I made 0.2 s shot on 2003 camera, without I.S. People today will have problem with that time on I.S. cameras, with same focal. Despite that (resolution) i think your hands were not so calm and i think pic could be much better. And crop is still problem, you should take more bottom and no croping above would be nesessary. Also yellow reflextion on mirror is killing colors around, we have "cold" colors of subject and back with warm yellow reflex. --Mile (talk) 16:44, 5 December 2023 (UTC) p.S. Also, why didnt put biger zoom, no crop would be needed at all.

• Something like [1], it much more for 3:2. --Mile (talk) 17:29, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

• I like this crop. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:04, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose interesting setting, but could have been better caught as pointed out above. Underexposed as well. - Benh (talk) 13:41, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

• Of course, I missed you. Poco a poco (talk) 15:17, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Very nice play with the light patterns.--Ermell (talk) 17:00, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

* Neutral That car has a face that only a mother could love, but I like your choice of composition. The denoising was pretty aggressive though, and wiped out a lot of detail. If I'm reading the EXIF well, you used Lightroom's standard noise reduction and not the new AI one. If that's the case, why not give it a go? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 19:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

• Ok, let me try that and Topaz, let's see which one performs better. Poco a poco (talk) 20:52, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Julesvernex2: I uploaded the Topaz version, btw and for the record, definitely not my favourite car, not even brand, but still I nice shot, I believe. Poco a poco (talk) 21:32, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

• Thanks Diego. I hoped for a bigger improvement but, looking at the shutter speed, mirror slap may have robbed you of a shaper image to begin with. I don't find cars to be a particularly interesting subject but I share Ikan Kekek's point below that this can be viewed as an abstract play of light and shadow, and your bold choice of composition reinforces that:  Support --Julesvernex2 (talk) 08:39, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Nice photo to me, almost abstract-feeling, the way the lights echo the background and the reflections blur the line between the car and background. Sure, a little more room below the car could have been nice, but this composition is completely valid to me, and I'd encourage you all to view this composition abstractly and not on the basis of what would most clearly represent and contrast the car from its surroundings. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:47, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unbalanced composition, sorry. This image needs more space at the bottom, in my view. A car is supposed to have wheels, even though not visible in this case, the current crop gives the impression that the picture is cut too tight. And the over-generous space granted to the top increases this feeling of imbalance -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support I like the image as a creative work in itself, the car is just one part of the whole. The booth designer did a great job here, which I think the photographer captured beautifully. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:00, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support per Randomianin. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:06, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support The crop is an esthetic choice, it works here. --Selbymay (talk) 07:24, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support ★ 08:02, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:54, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose The idea is very cool. Unfortunately, it's noisy. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 18:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

• ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺}: what area is noisy in your opinion (the image is denoise, see discussion above)? and would be the first version acceptable for you? thank you Poco a poco (talk) 18:43, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

  Sorry for my poor vocabulary. I don't know what it's called, but it's the space under the logos on the car. ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:01, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

• To be honest, I haven't seen anything that I feel needs to be fixed, ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} Poco a poco (talk) 18:38, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Support It's an ad, but it's also a good photo. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  02:37, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support There is a certain dark Marvel vibe to this. ;-) --Cart (talk) 10:09, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too busy overall. --Laitche (talk) 15:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Basile. -- Ivar (talk) 20:13, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:02, 14 December 2023 (UTC)