Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mont de Chemun sun Mot de Sëuc y Sasplat.jpg

File:Mont de Chemun sun Mot de Sëuc y Sasplat.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 May 2024 at 14:22:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mont de Chemun sun Mot de Sëuc y Sasplat.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mont de Chemun sun Mot de Sëuc y Sasplat.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
•  Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Support  Neutral Impressive range of detail, great composition in good light. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

• Temporarily changed my vote to Neutral until the issue mentioned below is fixed. It would be a pity if the nomination fails because of this small detail. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
• I have to agree with Basile, that the addition of the sky has resulted in a strange cross pattern in the new section, as well as blurring the top of the peak. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment It needs to breath at the top, could you add more crop? Poco a poco (talk) 16:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
  • you’re right but I’d have to construct it, thanks ----Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

    It´s only sky, where is the problem. Ermell (talk) 22:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

•  Support ★ 22:44, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Weak support Nice Hasselblad X2D-100C! However, Poco is right that the composition could use more room above, hence the weak support. dllu (t,c) 00:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment  Oppose Poco pointed out exactly what I was going to write. The picture needs more space at the top to breathe -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Crop is too tight. -- Karelj (talk) 12:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice picture, but bad crop. Yann (talk) 20:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

• Crossed out my vote. Yann (talk) 10:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Karelj. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 07:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)  Support now, very cool. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 09:19, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment @Poco a poco, Radomianin, Ermell, Basile Morin, Karelj, Yann, and Красный: Thanks for your comment. I uploaded a new version with extension of the sky (thanks to "AI") --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:12, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

• Thanks for the notification, but the top of the mountain now shows weird artifacts and the generated clouds are of much lower quality than those really photographed. There are also colorful outlines around. Thus my negative vote remains. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
• Thanks for the note but I have to agree with Basile. PP should done better.--Ermell (talk) 21:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment I'll just take note that adding a strip of computer-generated sky and clouds here, sparked no debate, only a comment that the fix was was badly executed. --Cart (talk) 16:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment: would support if the sky is fixed. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)