Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pāhoehoe and Aa flows at Hawaii.jpg

File:Pāhoehoe and Aa flows at Hawaii.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 22 Jan 2009 at 15:16:33

•  Info It is a rare shot of two different types of red lava flows photographed side by side Pāhoehoe Lava and ʻaʻā flows at The Big Island of Hawaii. The picture was taken from a helicopter.

•  Info created , uploaded and nominated by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 15:16, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 15:16, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Stricktly from the graphic point of view it is a nice image, it has good tonal graduation and texture, and the red of the flowing lava gives it an extra touch. I suppose that it would be a good image for a geologist. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:03, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Awesome picture. —kallerna™ 16:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Super, très belle photo! --Acarpentier 17:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support touché. --Kanonkas_(talk) 18:06, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Aqwis (talk) 18:34, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support /Daniel78 (talk) 18:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:20, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Richard Bartz (talk) 23:40, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Quite a bit of chroma noise and rather smallish, but wow compensates in this case. Lycaon (talk) 23:44, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support nice -- Gorgo (talk) 16:51, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Its nice Madhurantakam
•  Support Correct colors and details. --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:07, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Karel (talk) 21:47, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --nice catch! --AlexanderKlink (talk) 22:35, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Surprisingly clear for photo from helicopter (I would have expected some movement from the machine), so well done. Very informative study of this geological feature. -- Robert of Ramsor (talk) 01:27, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 11:02, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support !!!Nice!!!! --Luc Viatour (talk) 14:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose It doesn't have depth of field.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 11:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Ö 10:50, 23 January 2009 (UTC)