Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorpa communis 04 (MK).jpg

File:Panorpa communis 04 (MK).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 May 2010 at 09:58:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Panorpa communis 04 (MK).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorpa communis 04 (MK).jpg

•  Info a common male scorpionfly Panorpa communis
• c/u/n by -- mathias K 09:58, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- mathias K 09:58, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Trace (talk) 10:52, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 13:35, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:40, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:46, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - MPF (talk) 00:33, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice. Steven Walling 01:59, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 06:52, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --AngMoKio (talk) 20:41, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
• weak  Support. Why did you not chose the first other version, which shows a greater part of this insect ? But this one is good too, even I prefer the other.--Jebulon (talk) 22:11, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Cause of the background. I don`t like the composition as much as at the other 3 versions. But you are right, the most encyclopic view over the whole insect gives the first one. Greetings mathias K 08:45, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

•  Support --ianaré (talk) 03:41, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Amada44 (talk) 20:39, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Not bad, but the focus seems to be placed more on the far side of the head and the "stinger" than the near side. Perhaps this is harsh, but with such a narrow DOF, I think the placement of the focus should be more precise. Thanks for nominating it though; I'd never heard of these before. --Avenue (talk) 00:12, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Agree with Avenue on the focus issue and don't like the angle and composition either. Please check this FP of the same subject. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:53, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

• composition is a little nicer on the one you linked, but this one is by no means bad. Also has more detail on the head. I think both can coexist happily. --ianaré (talk) 05:01, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

•  Support, good composition - this is better than the picture Alvesgaspar linked, in my opinion. --Aqwis (talk) 10:21, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:41, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

•  Support -- Binoy (talk) 14:47, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Brackenheim (talk) 16:52, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:56, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods