Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Reichtstag, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-21, DD 31-33 HDR.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2019 at 21:39:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
- Info Night view of the Reichstag, a historic edifice in Berlin, Germany, constructed to house the Imperial Diet of the German Empire. It was opened in 1894 and housed the Diet until 1933, when it was severely damaged after being set on fire. After World War II, the building fell into disuse; the parliament of the German Democratic Republic met in the Palast der Republik in East Berlin, while the parliament of the Federal Republic of Germany (the Bundestag) met in the Bundeshaus in Bonn. The ruined building was restaurated after German reunification on 3 October 1990, when it underwent a reconstruction led by architect Norman Foster. After its completion in 1999, it once again became the meeting place of the German parliament: the modern Bundestag. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 21:39, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:39, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support a bit windy. Charles (talk) 23:10, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Some ghosts above the hedges in the bottom-right — Rhododendrites talk | 23:27, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Rhododendrites: I removed those HDR artifacts, --Poco a poco (talk) 20:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 23:29, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:57, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Neutral Strong sky noise, f/5 could be more acurrate and faster to get a sharp image, a bit small if you see the camera used. Everything fixable --Wilfredor (talk) 02:33, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Wilfredor: I've reduced the noise. The f/11 is the optimal setting for the lens I used. Poco a poco (talk) 20:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Domob (talk) 09:39, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:39, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose -- while the quality is acceptable in most parts of the image, some parts appear to have too strong noise reduction, causing some elements to blend into the sky. For example, the two objects on either side of the dome. Also, I find the dynamic range insufficient for dark parts of the scene (despite HDR having been used). For comparison, File:Reichstag zur blauen Stunde, Berlin-Mitte, 1705312210, ako.jpg has much better details in the shadows as it was taken at blue hour, and it is also generally sharper thanks to the superior lens used. However, I do appreciate the longer focal length used in this photo, allowing the dome to be much more prominent. dllu (t,c) 07:52, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per dllu, this not finest on Commons. --Ivar (talk) 12:09, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per dllu. Other picture is far superior in sharpness, details, lighting and timing (blue hour prevents the foreground grass from disappearing into black, and creates better background for the building. -- Colin (talk) 12:42, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Colin; also, there's this sort of halo around the building that makes some of the more distant details of the rear roof look more drawn than photographed. Daniel Case (talk) 02:01, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Neutral per dllu. I would have supported if dllu hadn't linked to the other shot, but that one is unfortunately definitely superior, and so I don't think this is really the best on Commons. Cmao20 (talk) 17:04, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 08:23, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Poco a poco (talk) 09:33, 15 December 2019 (UTC)