Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SMS Arcona NH 65764 - Restoration.jpg

File:SMS Arcona NH 65764 - Restoration.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2019 at 02:59:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:SMS Arcona NH 65764 - Restoration.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SMS Arcona NH 65764 - Restoration.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport
•  Info Unknown photographer, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:59, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:59, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

• Very nice, but you should increase the contrast. The ship is supposed to be white, isn't? Regards, Yann (talk) 03:54, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

• Category:Hugo Graf says... maybe yes, maybe no. Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:04, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

@Yann: But, presuming the uniforms have white in them - which, given that such uniforms were pretty much universally navy blue or white, is a safe bet - we can assume something's white in the image, and adjust accordingly. There we are! I don't like to over-stretch the levels; it's not literally radiating light, but that should be pretty good. Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:30, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

•  moderate oppose highly interesting, skillfully restored - no doubt! It's just that I find the composition a bit unbalanced. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:33, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Believable to me, and a very good historical photo, in my opinion. Martin, are you objecting to the amount of water in the foreground? If so, I won't oppose an 1897 photo with this much content for that reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:42, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

• Well, I do ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:41, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

• Fair enough. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:13, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Support with the lastest contrast correction, but personally I would go a bit further: File:SMS Arcona NH 65764 - Restoration, edit.jpg. Please add categories. Yann (talk) 06:02, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

I'm fine with that. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:30, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Support.--Vulphere 07:22, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry but it doesn't really excite me...--Peulle (talk) 07:49, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent historical photo. Cmao20 (talk) 17:31, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:30, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 16:57, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Similar image with superb quality, but taken last week would not get a single supporting vote. —kallerna (talk) 04:37, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
  • And... how do you plan to do that? Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:50, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Podzemnik (talk) 20:18, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Boothsift 03:48, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Eatcha (talk) 20:27, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Boothsift 04:45, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport