Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sankt. Moritz Kirche Sauders Villanders 04.jpg

File:Sankt. Moritz Kirche Sauders Villanders 04.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2013 at 07:49:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Sankt. Moritz Kirche Sauders Villanders 04.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sankt. Moritz Kirche Sauders Villanders 04.jpg

•  Info created by Moroder - uploaded by Moroder - nominated by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Very detailed and nice. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:33, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Ausgezeichnet, Wolfgang. Eine wirklich gelungene Aufnahme! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:27, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --P e z i (talk) 16:23, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support JKadavoor Jee 17:01, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:46, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Halavar (talk) 22:39, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Very good.   • Richard • [®] • 23:40, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 10:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support ArionEstar (talk) 14:49, 9 December 2013 (UTC) Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits. JKadavoor Jee 16:14, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Already noticed in the QIC page, and I'm stil "wow"ed.--Jebulon (talk) 09:32, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
• weak  Oppose Has no one noticed the massive unsharpness at the bottom (starting at the left foot)? I guess it is due to 62mm/f10 and not due to border unsharpness. For a repro-like photo imho not OK. The bottom front parts of the statue are out of focus (you can see it very well if you take a look on the gradient of sharpness at the bottom side of the statue, the wall at this position is also relatively sharp). Every macro-shot of a flower had been denied with such a DoF problem. Sharpness and quality at the other parts are very good as already pointed out by the other reviewers. --Tuxyso (talk) 11:03, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

I guess the focal plane isn't parallel because of a raised position of the statue.   • Richard • [®] • 13:14, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 19:37, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Jee 16:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects